Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-12-2009, 06:39 AM
 
30,063 posts, read 18,663,011 times
Reputation: 20880

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Indurain View Post
The entire world - not just the USA - has imploded economically.

The fact of the matter is that Obama's policies are correct.

The 1930's recession shows us that investment by the govt is essential in a recession like this.

The private sector won't/can't step in to the breech.


Suggest you familiarise yourself with John Maynard Keynes, David Blanchflower etc

There is no evidence that Obama is correct. For that matter, the fact that the situation has not imporved under his tuteledge would suggest exactly the opposite. The spending and intervention during the depression prolonged the depression. WW2 solved the depression. How many factory jobs has Obama created or "saved"? Maybe he should start WW3; perhaps that is what he is currently working on with his foriegn policy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-12-2009, 08:01 AM
 
19,198 posts, read 31,473,857 times
Reputation: 4013
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
There is no evidence that Obama is correct.
Yes, there is. But right-wingers decide that any evidence showing that Obama is correct (like maybe 3.5% growth in GDP) doesn't count as evidence anymore. Sort of like they decide that all the things he has accomplished don't count as accomplishments, meaning that he hasn't really accomplished anything.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
The spending and intervention during the depression prolonged the depression.
Well, at least that's what revisionist whackos at the Mises Institute seem to think. Anywhere else, Amity Shlaes = laughing stock.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
WW2 solved the depression.
Ah, so a large government stimulus program did the trick. I see...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2009, 08:07 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,101,577 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by saganista View Post
Yes, there is. But right-wingers decide that any evidence showing that Obama is correct (like maybe 3.5% growth in GDP) doesn't count as evidence anymore.
You mean that GDP growth which was mostly directly due to the government spending? Since when was massive government spending and manipulating of the markets, such as the stock market, the car sales market, home sales market etc all been a good thing to you? I bet January 20th 09 is the date lying became positive ha?
Quote:
Originally Posted by saganista View Post
Yes, there is. But right-wingers decide that any evidence showing that Obama Sort of like they decide that all the things he has accomplished don't count as accomplishments, meaning that he hasn't really accomplished anything.
Now you got it. Many of us "right wingers" actually want him to stop doing things more harmful than the "helpful" things he is accomplishing. You cant name one single positive thing Obama has done that has not had negative effects elsewhere which were greater than the positive things listed.

That growth in GDP, mostly due to increased cars out the door, completely ignores the fact that car sales dropped like a rock, and taxpayers are picking up that huge tab thereby resulting in less spending in the next quarter for GDP. It created a bubble, just like many said it would, but you guys in Washington all ignored it. You thought that an increase in the GDP would simply cause everythng to believe the economy was better and go out and spend. NEWSFLASH, those without jobs, or knowing indiivduals without jobs, wont be out spending, and that pretty describes many americans. If you have a job, you probably know people who dont, which reminds you daily of the problems we have. No imaginary increase in the GDP will make americans forget reality.
Quote:
Originally Posted by saganista View Post
Ah, so a large government stimulus program did the trick. I see...
Actually it was JOBS that did the trick.. Not pretend ones, but real ones..

Last edited by pghquest; 11-12-2009 at 08:17 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2009, 09:11 AM
 
19,198 posts, read 31,473,857 times
Reputation: 4013
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
You mean that GDP growth which was mostly directly due to the government spending? Since when was massive government spending and manipulating of the markets, such as the stock market, the car sales market, home sales market etc all been a good thing to you? I bet January 20th 09 is the date lying became positive ha?
Do you ever actually look at any of the data from "the USBEA"? Personal Consumption Expenditures UP by 3.4% in the third quarter. Gross Private Domestic Investment UP by 11.5% in the third quarter (first increase in two years). Exports UP by 14.7% in the third quarter. Imports UP by 16.4% in the third quarter. Government Expenditures and Investment UP by 2.3% in the third quarter.

This disconnected rant is just another demonstration of the right-wing's free-floating, hatred-driven irrationality.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2009, 09:20 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,101,577 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by saganista View Post
Do you ever actually look at any of the data from "the USBEA"? Personal Consumption Expenditures UP by 3.4% in the third quarter. Gross Private Domestic Investment UP by 11.5% in the third quarter (first increase in two years). Exports UP by 14.7% in the third quarter. Imports UP by 16.4% in the third quarter. Government Expenditures and Investment UP by 2.3% in the third quarter.

This disconnected rant is just another demonstration of the right-wing's free-floating, hatred-driven irrationality.
yes, I've seen all of the data, (but do find it interesting that you list government expenditures up as a reply to my argument that government expenditures were up)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2009, 09:26 AM
 
19,198 posts, read 31,473,857 times
Reputation: 4013
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
yes, I've seen all of the data, (but do find it interesting that you list government expenditures up as a reply to my argument that government expenditures were up)
If THAT was your argument, your choice of words in...

You mean that GDP growth which was mostly directly due to the government spending?

...was really, really, really, really poor. The increase in Government Expenditure and Investment was the SMALLEST of any GDP component.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2009, 09:37 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,101,577 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by saganista View Post
If THAT was your argument, your choice of words in...

You mean that GDP growth which was mostly directly due to the government spending?

...was really, really, really, really poor. The increase in Government Expenditure and Investment was the SMALLEST of any GDP component.
Do you REALLY want to break down the government money?
When Bush left office,
net government savings was -730.2, now its almost twice as much negative, with the last account at -1319.1,
Social Security funds were -85, now its 4 times this amount at -275.6

Do you really want to break down these line by line? It would be extremely embarrasing to discuss them but if you wish..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2009, 09:39 AM
 
19,198 posts, read 31,473,857 times
Reputation: 4013
You made an entirely erroneous statement about GDP and got called on it. Get over it. You should be used to this sort of thing by now...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2009, 09:41 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,101,577 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Do you really want to break down these line by line? It would be extremely embarrasing to discuss them but if you wish..
Quote:
Originally Posted by saganista View Post
You made an entirely erroneous statement and got called on it. Get over it. You should be used to it by now...
That was a no then..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2009, 09:42 AM
 
Location: Keonsha, Wisconsin
2,479 posts, read 3,235,316 times
Reputation: 586
Jobless claims lowest since January - Nov. 12, 2009
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top