Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
dr. tiller was not the "arbiter of who deserved to live and who deserved to die" it was the woman's choice. if someone went around murdering women who had abortions would that be ok?
Are you kidding? So if somene said I want "joe blow" dead and someone else actually kiled "joe blow" they were not the arbiter if "joe blow" deserved to live or deserved to die? OK
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,435 posts, read 54,895,095 times
Reputation: 40959
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonrise
True, but he was the one to "pull the trigger", so to speak. So in essence, he was the arbiter of life, since without him, no one else would murder these babies.
He acted within the law, his murderer did not and deserves to be punished to its full extent.
Can we all just agree that no one in their right mind could consider murdering another human being. You HAVE to be quite insane to commit such an act.
It is obvious while he might have believed himself to be a true Christian, he just could not have been, by his very thoughts and actions.
Very true. I agree 100%.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene
Oh, that's right. They are not technically worthy of rights until the head presents.
Very convenient justification for the murder of children.
Many pro-choicers will argue that even late-term abortions are a-ok. I can understand the argument in the first trimester and early second trimester, but later than that, I fail to see a substantive difference between the abortion and murdering a born baby.
NOTE: The person who killed the doctor, regardless, needs to rot in a cell until the day he dies.
Last edited by afoigrokerkok; 05-31-2009 at 08:21 PM..
I'm aware that he was acquitted of the charges. I'm unaware of the exact details of the case(s) - I will look into it some more. That said, there are cases pending with the Medical Board....still....against his medical license.
While his actions may or may not have been criminal, I'm not willing to label his actions as "entirely legal" as the poster suggested until the Medical Board renders judgment.
Not in most cases at the stage of pregnancy at which these fetuses were aborted
"Kansas law allows abortions after a fetus can survive outside the womb only if two independent doctors agree that it is necessary to save a women’s life or prevent “substantial and irreversible” h
harm to “a major bodily function,” a phrase that has been interpreted to include mental health."
Really? He was only one of three vermin in the whole USofA that murdered babies after 21 months. They were viable outside of the womb. If you're supporting that, then you're no better then he is.
Wrong. The investigation was started by the anti-abortion AG, but the charges were filed by a pro-choice one.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
