Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-22-2009, 02:33 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,665,061 times
Reputation: 7943

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by neil0311 View Post
Oh please.... yeah, I should educate my 11 year old (what about even younger children) on erectile dysfunction? Are you freakin serious or just saying that to see what kind of reaction you get? You can't possible be that tone deaf, can you?

Do you have children? I bet not.

How about the drug companies don't bombard the airwaves and cable channels with constant video billboards aimed at guys who can't get boners? How about if they really have to do that, they do it at a more appropriate time, when young children aren't watching. Or a better idea is just let men discuss their issues privately with their doctor, then no one has to endure that crap.
I hear you. I'm unusual in that I have very few hang-ups about sexuality, but I understand that most American adults do.

If you're a Republican, hopefully you're not beyond supporting a Democrat on some issues. Congressman Jim Moran has introduced a bill which would address your very concerns:

Are Erectile Dysfunction Ads Too Sexy? - ABC News

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp...ngHg0PLFJ4TIKQ

To me, it's just more burying-our-heads-in-the-sand over human sexuality, but whatever. Many Americans are uncomfortable with the subject and seem unwilling to change. The only way they can make themselves more comfortable about the subject is to ignore it completely.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-22-2009, 02:37 PM
 
7,138 posts, read 14,636,912 times
Reputation: 2397
Quote:
Originally Posted by ergohead View Post
Hey, just following Supreme Court tests.

But, I think its based on whether THEY get aroused.

They are some old, old fogies.

Yes, the hoary headed sages. Most of them need to go, as in yesterday.


The cute flick is definitely soft porn. Rarely watch YOUtube, so not aware of their "standards".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2009, 02:42 PM
 
19,226 posts, read 15,318,165 times
Reputation: 2337
Quote:
Originally Posted by lilypad View Post
Yes, the hoary headed sages. Most of them need to go, as in yesterday.


The cute flick is definitely soft porn. Rarely watch YOUtube, so not aware of their "standards".
Well, go to YouTube and query something more pornish and you will have to first register, and then swear you are at least 18 years old and then confirm it by clicking "confirm".

A very difficult process for someone under age.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2009, 03:06 PM
 
7,138 posts, read 14,636,912 times
Reputation: 2397
Quote:
Originally Posted by ergohead View Post
Well, go to YouTube and query something more pornish and you will have to first register, and then swear you are at least 18 years old and then confirm it by clicking "confirm".

A very difficult process for someone under age.

Who helped you access the site then?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2009, 03:20 PM
 
19,226 posts, read 15,318,165 times
Reputation: 2337
Quote:
Originally Posted by lilypad View Post
Who helped you access the site then?
Oh, C'mon, I was only being childish in the next post.

https://www.city-data.com/forum/polit...ml#post8937101
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2009, 03:42 PM
 
7,138 posts, read 14,636,912 times
Reputation: 2397
Quote:
Originally Posted by ergohead View Post
Oh, C'mon, I was only being childish in the next post.

https://www.city-data.com/forum/polit...ml#post8937101


I know.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2009, 04:04 PM
 
Location: Chicago Metropolitan Area
58 posts, read 91,116 times
Reputation: 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manapanda View Post
*Disclaimer*
Call me old- fashioned. In fact, call me whatever you like. Everyone has their own opinions on any given subject, and everyone is entitled to that ^^ I don't judge on such things, but I do decide on what I feel is right or wrong, for myself. (just as everyone else does)

That being said, I am starting to get terribly tired of flipping on the tv, the radio, looking in a newspaper, seeing billboards, magazines, web-sites, store-adds, on t-shirts, movies etc etc with sexuality blatantly exposed on it. Is anyone else tired of this as well? Sometimes I feel like, no matter where I look, I am bound to find it.

I hope this is just a fad. A fashion trend, that will go out with all the rest. Funnily enough, it seems to be getting worse, before it gets better. Grade schoolers, Middle schoolers. Yes, it is even there. Since when is it okay for little kids to wear things like.. thongs and mini-skirts? I am appalled.

Freedom of speech, and of expression is all well and good. Yet when something like this completely encroaches on someone elses freedom, how can that possibly be "fair"? No, life is not "fair" and yet... where is my freedom to go about the day without being bombarded by these things? Where is MY freedom to see such things ONLY between couples? Where is MY freedom to have MY child grow up in a society free from such.. visuals?

People have the right to harm others, in essence. People have the right to step on each others toes to have whatever they want, and to do whatever they would like to do. People can drink, and possibly cause accidents. People can smoke and harm themselves and others. So I guess, people have the right to shove sexuality in your face wether or not you want to see it.

So, again, why don't I get to have my rights? Family values, and in essence, the chance at pure monogamy?

The best I can do is in a way, refuse to acknowledge it. That does not mean it is not there, however. I do believe, the only nudity I have ever wanted to see in my life, is my husbands. Well, there is no chance at that, even if I want there to be. It's just.. unfortunate.

In this society, it just seems impossible.

Once again, I don't condone those who like to see such things, or participate in such things.. or even those who don't mind them. I just wish that there was a way to go about these things so that... You can see the stuff if you really want to, or not see them if you don't. Right now, there is no such option.

I agree with you in the fact that today's generation is much more promiscuous and sex-oriented than past generations.
It has a lot to do with the way that sex is portrayed in the media, as well as the way that they were raised, and if the parents did their job.

Also, sex is a big seller in the media because, of course, it makes people feel good. (How ironic )
There are shows like Sex and the City, which is basically prime-time porn.
Then there's the fashion industry, which has women that are severely underweight, and exposed; since the fashion designers need endorsements as well as the companies, they have to find a way to lure and arouse the bigwig CEO's for money.

However, nudity is natural, and children are going to see it no matter what. They'll see it every day. They'll see them selves nude in the shower. At some point in their lives they're going to have sex, unless they're in some anti-sexual reproduction group.
Children don't need to see sex until they're of appropriate age (high school), and they need to be encouraged to have safe sex instead of abstinence because if they do find themselves having sex, and they don't have any protection, it's likely you'll end up with a teenage pregnancy.

~Love&Peace
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2009, 02:01 AM
 
Location: The Chatterdome in La La Land, CaliFUNia
39,031 posts, read 23,016,954 times
Reputation: 36027
Quote:
Originally Posted by nvxplorer View Post
Lots of people dislike lots of things. Such is life in a free society.

Your dislike for my speech does not entitle you do stifle such speech, and vice-versa. There is no constitutional protection against embarrasment.
It's about common decency especially during programs when children are likely to watch. Although I personally don't have a TV, many parents do monitor what their children watch but how can a parent monitor an unexpected advertisement promoting a sexual product or some other form of indecency that was not expected. How many parents expected Janet Jackson to bare her breast during the Super Bowl a few years back? Can't we enjoy a TV program without sexual displays or innuendos?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2009, 02:13 AM
 
Location: The Chatterdome in La La Land, CaliFUNia
39,031 posts, read 23,016,954 times
Reputation: 36027
I believe there is a strong correlation to our sexuality-driven media and the high teenage pregnancy rates. The adults pushing this stuff on our children are very irresponsible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2009, 02:20 AM
 
Location: The Chatterdome in La La Land, CaliFUNia
39,031 posts, read 23,016,954 times
Reputation: 36027
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
I hear you. I'm unusual in that I have very few hang-ups about sexuality, but I understand that most American adults do.

If you're a Republican, hopefully you're not beyond supporting a Democrat on some issues. Congressman Jim Moran has introduced a bill which would address your very concerns:

Are Erectile Dysfunction Ads Too Sexy? - ABC News

AFP: US lawmaker targets Viagra ads

To me, it's just more burying-our-heads-in-the-sand over human sexuality, but whatever. Many Americans are uncomfortable with the subject and seem unwilling to change. The only way they can make themselves more comfortable about the subject is to ignore it completely.
Why does CHILDREN need to be exposed to this stuff? What benefits would an "erectile" drug ad serve for a child? It's no wonder kids these days are messed up and all in the name of "free speech".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top