Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-28-2011, 11:50 AM
 
2 posts, read 2,760 times
Reputation: 10

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
. . . Why is the only year going around for 2005? . . .

Here's 1981 through 2005, twenty-five years.

[url=http://www.taxfoundation.org/taxdata/show/22685.html]The Tax Foundation - Federal Taxes Paid vs. Federal Spending Received by State, 1981-2005[/url]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-28-2011, 12:49 PM
 
2,083 posts, read 1,622,537 times
Reputation: 1406
Quote:
Originally Posted by nimbleswitch View Post
Yeah, . . . and why do you think it's pretty much bankrupt? You think maybe because it's supporting all those red states? After all, standing alone, California has the sixth largest economy among countries of the world, last I heard.
California is digging it's own grave. The state is in denial about they've done to themselves, with $500 BILLION in unfunded liabilities and policies that are driving businesses out of state. Do you honestly think that the imbalance in federal dollars going to relatively low-population states like North Dakota and Alaska are what's bankrupting California? Total Federal farm subsidies per year are about $15B, so it's not farm subsidies causing this spending imbalance. What about welfare? CA ranks 2nd behind Rhode Island in welfare recipients per capita (and a distant first it total caseloads at over a million; nearly the entire population of skapegoat states like ND and AK combined). "Federal leech" South Dakota ranks #44 with 6,000 cases.

This has been beaten to death -- the majority of Federal taxes are paid by the wealthy. The wealthy tend to live in, <drumroll>, blue states like California and Connecticut. CA alone is home to nearly 1 in 5 of America's richest people; throw in NY and IL and that accounts for 40% of this country's wealthiest people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2011, 05:56 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,292 posts, read 20,768,953 times
Reputation: 9330
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghengis View Post
The Tax Foundation - Federal Spending Received Per Dollar of Taxes Paid by State, 2005

2005 Figures (A brief review of annual data from 1981 thru 2005 showed state rankings to be fairly consistent from year-to-year)

Federal Spending Received per Dollar of Taxes Paid

10 Biggest Receivers
1. New Mexico $2.03
2. Mississippi $2.02
3. Alaska $1.84
4. Louisiana $1.78
5. West Virginia $1.76
6. North Dakota $1.68
7. Alabama $1.66
8. South Dakota $1.53
9. Kentucky $1.51
10. Virginia $1.51

10 Biggest Donators
1. New Jersey $0.61
2. Nevada $0.65
3. Connecticut $0.69
4. New Hampshire $0.71
5. Minnesota $0.72
6. Illinois $0.75
7. Delaware $0.77
8. California $0.78
9. New York $0.79
10. Colorado $0.81

Revenue sharing is the worst cancer in our government. It should be totally abolished immediately.

Revenue sharing is the single biggest power grab by the federal government in our country's history and has allowed it to leech power from the states and do an end run around the constitution.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2011, 10:27 PM
 
Location: somewhere in the woods
16,880 posts, read 15,215,447 times
Reputation: 5240
Quote:
Originally Posted by harborlady View Post
Ironic considering MT & TX are thinking they could do better if they secede. They did better or about broke even, and Ca, NY, NJ have in a sense been paying their way all along.

Maybe NJ, NV, MN, CT & NH should drive to montana and cruise to alaska to stage tea party protests accusing them of deadbeat socialist welfare state???

Anyone know how to interpret that DC $$? Is that the capital/ white house budget? <weg>
considering that with Montanas low population, and no fderal intrusion at all and they could use their natural resources how they want instead of having the feds try and stifle it for them, I think Montana would do very well without the federal goverment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2011, 07:57 AM
 
10,854 posts, read 9,311,593 times
Reputation: 3122
Quote:
Originally Posted by Omahabound View Post
You conveniently leave out the Democratic swamp of DC that puts all the red states to shame.

$5.55 comapred to the $2.03 of the worst red state. But hey don't let facts get in the way.
You conveniently ignore the fact that the District Columbia is not a state it's a district that recieves it's operating revenue directly from the federal government. It has no ablity to levy a sales tax, real estate tax or, excise tax, income tax like a state can.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top