Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Do you support giving Ukraine F-16s
Yes 201 39.72%
No 256 50.59%
Unsure 49 9.68%
Voters: 506. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-12-2022, 08:39 AM
 
Location: Danville, VA
7,202 posts, read 6,910,989 times
Reputation: 4860

Advertisements

Looks like the Russians in Lyman are being taken to pound town by Ukrainian counter-battery fire.

https://twitter.com/wartranslated/st...17635887702021

Meanwhile, down on the southern front...

https://twitter.com/DefenceU/status/...xPtxRIuSPoi5qQ
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-12-2022, 08:51 AM
 
Location: NE Mississippi
25,792 posts, read 17,560,925 times
Reputation: 37698
There are still some posters who believe Russia has a 900,000 man army and has only to call its reserves to turn the tide of the war.
They are wrong.



* Corrupt practices from top to bottom resulted in funding being available for 900,000 men, but they never actually existed. The money was skimmed off and sent home with senior officers and recruiters.
* Russia has not been able to produce enough dismounted troops to hold territory.
* Tanks that required a crew of 5, actually only had 3.
* The famous line of stalled vehicles advertised the problems from the beginning. Fuel had been sold on the black market and was not available.
* Reactive armor that was supposed to protect tanks and crews did not, in fact, exist. Corruption resulted in unprotected crews.


And even if Russia had a 900,000 man army, they would not be able to pull all troops from every corner of their huge country and use them in Ukraine. Ukraine, on the other hand, is certainly able to use its entire army for self defense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2022, 08:54 AM
bu2
 
24,241 posts, read 15,080,406 times
Reputation: 13116
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocko20 View Post
Well they have 900,000+ other troops so I don't think they're worried about it.


https://inews.co.uk/news/world/russi...lained-1479833
The issue is that only 200-300k are fighting units. The rest are various logistics units.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2022, 09:05 AM
 
Location: Lost in Montana *recalculating*...
20,027 posts, read 22,980,796 times
Reputation: 25352
Russia is certainly getting their fanny handed to them. Their military is a global laughingstock right now.

I would not want to be Putin's tea tester right now. Me thinks his days may be numbered.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2022, 09:06 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles
7,817 posts, read 2,761,018 times
Reputation: 3388
Here is the latest interview with Michael Kofman who is very sober in his analysis....great listen

Quote:
On a foggy morning in August 1918, Allied forces commenced the Battle of Amiens and the ‘Hundred Days Offensive’ that ended the Great War. A German general later called it “the black day of the German Army.” The Russian military has had a black week ever since Ukraine launched a counter-offensive in the Kharkiv Oblast.

Whether this heralds the last phase of this war is still unknown. Regardless, recent events have been a massive setback for Russia. We had Mike Kofman on the show to discuss.
https://warontherocks.com/2022/09/uk...ys-black-week/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2022, 09:09 AM
 
1,200 posts, read 427,033 times
Reputation: 654
Hopefully Putin will not decide to nuke Ukraine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2022, 09:14 AM
 
3,290 posts, read 1,651,542 times
Reputation: 2926
Quote:
Originally Posted by bu2 View Post
The issue is that only 200-300k are fighting units. The rest are various logistics units.
That’s the point that keeps being ignored.

When they put 200,000+ troops into Ukraine in the beginning, this was like 70% of all of the boots on the ground they could muster across the whole country.

They really don’t have much left to add.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2022, 09:17 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles
7,817 posts, read 2,761,018 times
Reputation: 3388
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Sim_Mister View Post
Hopefully Putin will not decide to nuke Ukraine.
That would NOT be advisable!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2022, 09:38 AM
 
Location: Port Charlotte FL
4,997 posts, read 2,769,214 times
Reputation: 7791
Putin politely asked the prisoners, drunks and drug addicts if they wanted to go fight in the 'special military operation'...upon which they replied......"what r ya nuts?"...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2022, 09:49 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles
7,817 posts, read 2,761,018 times
Reputation: 3388
It maybe a good to idea to familiarize yourself with this formative study on Russia's view on nuclear weapons....just sayin. Let's just say it would not be a wise move for Russia.

Quote:
Some in the Russian military-analytical community still advocate for nuclear use at significantly earlier points in a conflict’s escalation, but the consensus across the journals suggests that this remains a losing position in Russian military thinking. Despite the emphasis on the role of nuclear weapons in escalation management, preventive nuclear threats are judged to not be credible in early periods of conflict. Most analysts argue for a means of nonnuclear deterrence that will complement nuclear-based strategies, while equally benefiting from the coercive effect that large nuclear arsenals contribute to calibrated forms of escalation. However the role for nonnuclear deterrence remains a complementary one to that of nuclear weapons, at conflicts of lesser scale such as local wars, or in earlier phases of a regional war. While some debates have clearly been settled, Russian thinking on escalation management and war termination continues to evolve, pricing in new capabilities, integrating added flexibility to the deterrence force structure, and responding to developments in the United States.
https://www.cna.org/reports/2020/04/...6101-Final.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top