Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Well, it's not quite as cut and dry as you're saying. Keep in mind one political party, yours, has been consistently undermining public confidence in a vaccine in order to further its political agenda.
Nope. Weve said we will listen to the scientists. Your party is the one who has been demanding we get one out before the election for political reasons. What nonsense.
Quote:
The Democrats are the new anti-vaxxers and they are doing it with no regard or care as to how many people DIE because of what they're doing.
Meanwhile in reality....
seriously do you believe this nonsense? Bwahahahahha.
I don't believe the masks protect me. I will wear a mask as long as the law requires and/or as long as masks seem necessary to reassure the frightened to come out of hiding.
Hopefully Darwin might do us the favor of taking care of folks who have "had enough "
That means they are tired of living anyway, right?
Speaking personally, the answers are, respectively, "Perhaps", and "essentially yes".
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestCobb
Why are the words expert and science in quotes? Is the implication that there are no such things and all claims to scientific and expertise are pretense?
I can't speak for the person to whom you responded, but pretense is operative once we pass from scientific observation to the making of ethical or policy decisions.
It's simple physics, that kinetic energy increases with the square of the velocity magnitude, and that the same reaction-time of a person traveling in a vehicle, means more distance traveled, linearly with increasing speed. That's the science. No pretense there. But to then assert, that for scientific reasons we ought to lower highway speed limits, in the interest of safety - now that is utter pretense.
You do know that wearing a mask does not protect you from getting this or any other virus. Right?
Actually, it depends on the mask. Most masks though are primarily for source control. They primarily protect those who encounter the mask wearer. Those who don't wear masks when the virus is prevalent are basically selfish jackasses.
Location: Somewhere gray and damp, close to the West Coast
20,955 posts, read 5,558,738 times
Reputation: 8559
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbgusa
I don't believe the masks protect me. I will wear a mask as long as the law requires and/or as long as masks seem necessary to reassure the frightened to come out of hiding.
I will wear one only to keep from causing the good merchants in my town to be fined when some stupid SJW moron calls the so-called governor's tattle line set up to make law enforcers out of merchants.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
