Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No big deal. Just another rape case against Trump that he is trying to get out of.
If some woman I never met accuses me of rape and say she has the rapist's DNA; I'd gladly provide mine and see it as a golden opportunity to clear my name.
But what do I know. There must be a reason the stable and totally moral genius is refusing provide his DNA to clear his name.
Bruh, you know it's not up to the accused to prove himself innocent.....right?
Exactly, it's up to the plaintiff to prove guilt, and the plaintiff said she has the rapist's DNA. The plaintiff is providing proof of guilt. Do you not get it?
The next step is for the defendant to show why the proof is hogwash. This is a simple step by providing his own DNA to show it does not match the rapist's.
Innocent people tends to want to prove they are innocent.
But what do I know. This must be the stable genius way of proving one's innocence - by acting suspiciously.
No big deal. Just another rape case against Trump that he is trying to get out of.
If some woman I never met accuses me of rape and say she has the rapist's DNA; I'd gladly provide mine and see it as a golden opportunity to clear my name.
But what do I know. There must be a reason the stable and totally moral genius is refusing provide his DNA to clear his name.
Say what? Are you right-wingers this tone deaf???!!!
You guys just dragged a 30 years old fake news about Biden into the spotlight just a couple weeks ago.
.
uhm. no we didn't. a devoted liberal made an allegation. all the major news outlets ran the story (accept ABC which promptly got an interview with Biden).
the ONLY thing conservatives have done is point out that during the Kavanagh hearings, we were told we had to believe 40 year old allegations simply because they had been made.
those same people are now suggesting that is no longer the case.
we didn't drag anything. we aren't the ones that are tone deaf
That was a completely different situation. that was an active investigation where there was probable cause of a committed crime.
this is vastly different. this is an allegation made by a political foe decades after the incident occurred.
there is NO connection between these two things.
Really? When is "consensual sex" a committed crime"?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
