Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: How many votes will Brett Kavanaugh get for confirmation in the Senate?
61 or more 14 6.25%
58-60 7 3.13%
55-57 13 5.80%
50-54 144 64.29%
49 or less 46 20.54%
Voters: 224. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 10-05-2018, 06:20 PM
 
18,782 posts, read 8,497,071 times
Reputation: 14082

Advertisements

Polls..and liberals have put into place a system where they follow people home, threaten them, accost them in public, DOX them....their base ANTIFA, Occupy, ***** hats, profanity is extremely violent
and democrat politicians have actively encouraged their base to do more....resist...whatever it takes

No conservative or republican will ever admit to some stranger over the phone..that has their name, address, and phone number....how they are going to vote

Even the pollsters admit they have to adjust numbers for the conservatives and republicans on their polls....they have to guess

No polls will ever be right.....but that's a good thing....make the liberals think they are ahead and less will bother to vote

 
Old 10-05-2018, 06:20 PM
 
736 posts, read 355,505 times
Reputation: 383
Quote:
Originally Posted by southbel View Post
Six, oh wait, no SEVEN background investigations. What have you got to back your assertion? A magic eight ball?
She probably realized, she made a mistake by declaring to vote no early. She should have waited like the two Democrats. Now it's too late to change her mind without digging a deeper hole than what she is already in.
 
Old 10-05-2018, 06:21 PM
 
21,532 posts, read 10,663,821 times
Reputation: 14198
Quote:
Originally Posted by serger View Post
Lol. Try to get angry at a job interview. Report back.
Lol, try not to get angry if your interviewers suddenly accuse you of sexual assault and running a gang rape ring, in front of the entire world including your young children.

They wanted him to withdraw his name in disgrace, but they backed him into a corner where he had no choice but to defend himself to retain any of his reputation. It’s not right, and I hope one day you’ll see how crazy this is.
 
Old 10-05-2018, 06:22 PM
 
736 posts, read 355,505 times
Reputation: 383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713 View Post
Corey Booker! Bwahahahaha!
What is that fool saying now?
 
Old 10-05-2018, 06:23 PM
 
Location: Sonoran Desert
39,178 posts, read 51,489,919 times
Reputation: 28444
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldhag1 View Post
Yeah..... well, your Democrat leaders are trying to help keep the fires burning hot by vowing to impeach him when they get the house.
They're not my leaders. I am an IND with positions from both extremes of left and right. Always have been. But, I have not heard any leadership in the Dems advocating impeaching him. It would be ridiculously difficult. It would be a lot easier to pack the court - say 15 justices - as it would take but a simple vote to do that. It might be a good idea anyway if it resulted in more moderates on the bench and less clear ideological division than 9 allows. Coupled with my call for 60 senators to approve, we could actually configure a court where we would not be able to predict the outcome before a case was even heard.
 
Old 10-05-2018, 06:24 PM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,566,787 times
Reputation: 10096
Quote:
Originally Posted by NekoLogic View Post
What is that fool saying now?
I cannot make myself watch.
 
Old 10-05-2018, 06:25 PM
 
22,138 posts, read 9,707,186 times
Reputation: 19659
Quote:
Originally Posted by NekoLogic View Post
What is that fool saying now?
Not much. Thankfully.
 
Old 10-05-2018, 06:25 PM
 
46,427 posts, read 27,286,636 times
Reputation: 11171
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
The FACT is that the Dem action did NOT apply to SC justices. Get it right before you write.

I'm not even sure what you wrote, are you?



BK is NOT a SC justice (until tomorrow)....
 
Old 10-05-2018, 06:25 PM
 
1,705 posts, read 541,786 times
Reputation: 1142
So, the 80% of his work done in the Bush White House.. is that ever going to be released to the public. The vast treasure throve of evidence the Republicans did not want to release?

Might find out they have elected a Supreme who considers Torture OK.
 
Old 10-05-2018, 06:26 PM
 
8,196 posts, read 2,865,324 times
Reputation: 4479
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
When the Dems take back the Senate I hope they restore the 60 vote requirement for SC judges. We have seen what a partisan fiasco the simple majority vote is. Needing "the other side" would lead to better choices and eliminate the spectacle and the pressure on the only decent senators we have, the moderates.
It's a lovely dream. Don't wake up!!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top