Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-21-2018, 05:30 PM
 
13,711 posts, read 9,246,733 times
Reputation: 9845

Advertisements

You want a smoking gun for the Russian collusion? This is it. We still don't have proof who fired the gun, but it is smoking alright. Big time smoking.

Quote:

Something was bugging me about the September '16 hack of the DNC analytics (beyond that it would give an opponent much of what they'd need to figure out who to target & with what). What was it? A couple weeks later, the Trump campaign abruptly & massively shifted their ad buys.

7 Oct 2016: MaggieHaberman: Trump Campaign is cancelling hundreds of thousands of dollars in advertising in Fla, NC, OH, possibly other states. Maggie Haberman and others wondered at the time (after Trump campaign said the shift was "data driven") what data would drive so large a shift, so late, out of rural areas and into bigger markets with populous suburbs. Trump advertised in Wisconsin the next week for the first time in the general election cycle.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zUApwyJhizQ


There are three possible scenarios:

1. The Russians stole the data and sat on it. (Which makes one wonder why they stole it in the first place). And miraculously the Trump campaign had an epiphany and completely changed their strategy. A strategy that would align with the analysis of the stolen data but their epiphany is completely independent of it.

Or

2. The Russians stole the data and anonymously dropped it off at the front step of Trump's campaign. The Trump campaign, without questioning where the data was from, bought into it 100% and started to change their strategy.

Or

3. The Russians stole the data and shared with the Trump campaign. In other words, collusion!


Which one do you think it is?

.

Last edited by beb0p; 07-21-2018 at 05:39 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-21-2018, 05:34 PM
 
8,196 posts, read 2,851,601 times
Reputation: 4478
You forgot the bullets.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2018, 05:36 PM
 
Location: Santa Monica
36,853 posts, read 17,393,629 times
Reputation: 14459
Hooray! Now Hillary is president.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2018, 05:41 PM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,333,713 times
Reputation: 8958
LOL!!! You people never quit. MSNBC isn't a trustworthy source for anything. This is just laughable. Nice try.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2018, 05:44 PM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,942 posts, read 22,560,902 times
Reputation: 25816
Well, if one football team got the playbook of the opposing football team - wouldn't they change their tactics to address what they just learned from stolen material?

(I thought maybe using a sports analogy would help the Trumplings comprehend).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2018, 05:45 PM
 
Location: Suburb of Chicago
31,848 posts, read 17,641,036 times
Reputation: 29386
So based on additional information the Trump campaign suddenly changed their strategy?

Maybe they weren't as dumb as I thought they were.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2018, 05:46 PM
 
8,196 posts, read 2,851,601 times
Reputation: 4478
Quote:
Originally Posted by beb0p View Post
You want a smoking gun for the Russian collusion? This is it. We still don't have proof who fired the gun, but it is smoking alright. Big time smoking.





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zUApwyJhizQ


There are three possible scenarios:

1. The Russians stole the data and sat on it. (Which makes one wonder why they stole it in the first place). And miraculously the Trump campaign had an epiphany and completely changed their strategy. A strategy that would align with the analysis of the stolen data but their epiphany is completely independent of it.

Or

2. The Russians stole the data and anonymously dropped it off at the front step of Trump's campaign. The Trump campaign, without questioning where the data was from, bought into it 100% and started to change their strategy.

Or

3. The Russians stole the data and shared with the Trump campaign. In other words, collusion!


Which one do you think it is?

.
OR


Kelly Ann Conway did an interview right after the election. In it she told how that they did their own polling which showed Trump doing well in certain states that he wasn't supposed to be doing as well in.
They changed their strategy and campaigned in states that usually would have gone Democrat.

Hillary didn't bother with those states. She was too busy hiding her sickness.

Your smoking gun has blanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2018, 05:48 PM
 
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
10,930 posts, read 11,738,036 times
Reputation: 13170
This is pure speculation, the new normal in US journalism, descending to a level even below The National Enquirer and now matching Fox News. The press has helped to divide America into two alternative, made-up realities, neither of which have any factual basis. Is there a third alternative, anywhere? None that I have seen or heard.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2018, 05:49 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Gilead
12,716 posts, read 7,827,345 times
Reputation: 11338
Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post
LOL!!! You people never quit. MSNBC isn't a trustworthy source for anything. This is just laughable. Nice try.
But Fox News is?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2018, 05:53 PM
 
Location: Free From The Oppressive State
30,293 posts, read 23,777,638 times
Reputation: 38758
Hahahaha! Rachel Maddow is speculating over something "sticking in her craw" and you call it "smoking gun"?

LMFAO!

Oh, lefties, you must continue, this is some of the best comedy out there right now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top