Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-17-2018, 05:40 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles (Native)
25,303 posts, read 21,482,730 times
Reputation: 12319

Advertisements

The message seems to be clear landlords not welcome in Oakland .

No doubt if this passes other “progressive “ cities like L.A will likely try the same thing to “capture” revenue from landlords .

Landlords in Oakland aren’t making big bucks based on current property prices .

Also 1% today and then they’ll say they need 2, 3% ..

It is the politicians that allowed the homeless situation to get out of control with their liberal policy of homelessness as a lifestyle choice .

—-
OAKLAND — As the Bay Area struggles with an alarming homelessness crisis, voters may soon decide whether to force Oakland’s biggest landlords to pay up to help house the city’s most vulnerable residents.

Oakland Councilwoman Rebecca Kaplan wants to impose an extra 1 percent annual tax on rental revenue that exceeds $200,000, and use that money to fund homeless shelters, help homeless residents secure permanent housing and clean up the sprawling encampments that line many of the city’s sidewalks.

The city needs more money to tackle the problem, and collecting it from Oakland’s biggest-earning landlords makes sense, Kaplan said. Rising rents are pushing people out of their homes, but at the same time, landlords are raking in cash, she said.

“We’re capturing revenue where it is,” Kaplan said, “and we’re capturing the revenue that has a relationship to the problem of homelessness.”

https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/07/...ands-homeless/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-17-2018, 05:50 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,189,134 times
Reputation: 21743
Quote:
Originally Posted by jm1982 View Post
Oakland Councilwoman Rebecca Kaplan wants to impose an extra 1 percent annual tax on rental revenue that exceeds $200,000, and use that money to fund homeless shelters, help homeless residents secure permanent housing and clean up the sprawling encampments that line many of the city’s sidewalks.

Well, there's three reasons right there to raise rent even higher.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2018, 05:54 PM
 
11,836 posts, read 5,816,767 times
Reputation: 14274
Problem is they are ending up taxing many middle class Americans to subsidize the poor. Having a home where rental exceeds $200,000 a year is not upscale as apts are expensive out there.

I have friends who live out there and even with the husband's good salary - they are starting to come up short due to the increases in property tax and the taxes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2018, 06:11 PM
 
1,199 posts, read 639,855 times
Reputation: 2031
Quote:
Originally Posted by xray731 View Post
Problem is they are ending up taxing many middle class Americans to subsidize the poor. Having a home where rental exceeds $200,000 a year is not upscale as apts are expensive out there.

I have friends who live out there and even with the husband's good salary - they are starting to come up short due to the increases in property tax and the taxes.
When you say "having a home" do you mean "having a tenement with a bunch of units?" $200K/year is $17K/month in rent. That's the mortgage, taxes, and insurance on a $3M property in a high-tax area. There aren't many middle-class folks who can qualify for a mortgage on a $3M property.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2018, 06:30 PM
 
45,247 posts, read 26,482,257 times
Reputation: 25001
Oakland could tax them 100% and there would still be homeless. This is another rip off scheme cloaked in compassion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2018, 06:43 PM
 
4,336 posts, read 1,558,380 times
Reputation: 2279
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
Oakland could tax them 100% and there would still be homeless. This is another rip off scheme cloaked in compassion.
Excuse, me, but the term is "faux compassion". It is just pretense, not true causation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2018, 06:46 PM
 
Location: Pyongjang
5,701 posts, read 3,226,848 times
Reputation: 3925
LOL so jack up the bay area rents evven more lol

This is a clear example of soaking the middle class
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2018, 07:02 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles (Native)
25,303 posts, read 21,482,730 times
Reputation: 12319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
Oakland could tax them 100% and there would still be homeless. This is another rip off scheme cloaked in compassion.
Yeah exactly , and the money will go to political connected organizations in order to sustain the homeless industrial complex .

In L.A the homeless housing units cost $400,000 per unit to build !
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2018, 07:20 PM
 
Location: Tucson/Nogales
23,235 posts, read 29,080,592 times
Reputation: 32644
They should tax the anti-development, anti-density Nimby's 10% instead, as they're behind the lack of housing in the entire Bay area.

We don't want you to build here, or there, we don't want the added traffic, we don't this building to block our views of the Bay, we don't you to build it too high, we don't want you razing that building because it has historic significance, etc. etc. etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2018, 07:25 PM
 
Location: DFW
40,955 posts, read 49,242,733 times
Reputation: 55010
I think it's a great idea. CA citizens keep electing these idiots and they deserve what they get.

Maybe when taxes are through the roof they'll get pizzed off enough to wise up that Libs don't know how to run Governments.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top