Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-05-2017, 06:50 PM
 
Location: Alameda, CA
7,605 posts, read 4,851,318 times
Reputation: 1438

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
Even more evidence against Rice.

Under 18 USC 798, it is a felony to knowingly and willfully communicate classified material to an unauthorized person.
A similar law, 50 USC 1809, forbids the unauthorized disclosure of national security information. Three other statutes may also have been violated.



Gregg Jarrett: Did Susan Rice break the law? | Fox News
The link provides zero evidence against Rice. Its just speculation and rank propaganda.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-05-2017, 06:52 PM
 
26,544 posts, read 15,116,847 times
Reputation: 14691
Quote:
Originally Posted by djmilf View Post
Really? Care to elaborate? Please list events, names, and dates - because nobody's been able to provide this information.
To your point, didn't Obama recently use an executive order to change the procedure of sharing, so more agencies have access to it at that point -- meaning it would be hard to determine who exactly leaked it if a felony was committed. We as of now can't prove it was Rice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2017, 06:54 PM
 
Location: Alameda, CA
7,605 posts, read 4,851,318 times
Reputation: 1438
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dockside View Post
It's astonishing watching you folks struggle with this mess. When Trump made his first accusations about Obama the criticism was deafening. Now look where you are...yeah, he spied on Trump, but it was legal dummy, don't you get it?

C'mon folks, an outgoing Democratic administration spied on the presidential campaign of a Republican competitor in an attempt to sway the election by leaking sensational information. Justify it all you want, it doesn't get any dirtier than this. Obama got away with it in 2012 with the IRS scandal, I guess he thought he could do it again.

My prediction, for what it's worth, this is going to turn into the largest political scandal we've ever seen in our lifetime.
So far there is zero evidence that Obama spied on Trump.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2017, 07:03 PM
 
12,270 posts, read 11,342,826 times
Reputation: 8066
Just to make this whole Obama leaking scandal even jucier...Evelyn Farkas was a foreign policy advisor for Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton. Anyone else curious how much unmasked info Obama had Susan Rice or Ben Rhodes funnel to Hillary through Farkas ? Anyone else curious what Hilary did with that information?

This is going to get deeper and uglier.

It makes you wonder about those deleted emails.

If Putin has them, he would've had Hillary in an iron grip.

Last edited by Dockside; 04-05-2017 at 07:35 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2017, 08:46 PM
 
941 posts, read 1,794,855 times
Reputation: 768
Quote:
Originally Posted by djmilf View Post
The charge against Susan Rice is that she deliberately unmasked Trump personnel in classified information.

The YUGE flaw in that argument is that if the personnel were masked in the classified information, then she couldn't possibly know that the masked personnel were Trump's people.

But the conservative propaganda effort is so desperate to crystalize attention upon something other than the problems of the Trump administration, they've finally settled on Susan Rice as the scapegoat of the moment.
This is another of T Rump's fallacies that he uses to distract others that he wants to change the subject from what ever disaster he has talked his way into lately. Recently he has been polling so low that he can't get out of his recent prevarication cesspool with more words that he can't support with evidence. It seems remarkable that the electorate was so deceived by the constant barrage of "believe me" that he can manage to even poll a single person who feels this president can be trusted to the extent that any words uttered by him have a basis in fact. They just announce another member of the T Rump team must leave. Has it become possible that the electorate can use the Constitution to remove this naked emperor from the office?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2017, 09:19 PM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
7,188 posts, read 4,774,809 times
Reputation: 4874
Quote:
Originally Posted by evilnewbie View Post
Clean out the earwax in your ears is all it takes... someone with intimate knowledge told her and she listened with her EARS.. at some point SOMEONE knew before it was masked... at some point SOMEONE told her the knowledge that they knew... at THAT point, she decided to unmask it... anti-Trumpers can't figure out their left from their right...
Evidence please.

Stop speculating.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2017, 09:22 PM
 
Location: Victoria, BC.
33,567 posts, read 37,175,863 times
Reputation: 14021
Quote:
Originally Posted by EDnurse View Post
Evidence please.

Stop speculating.
Trump made the claim and that's all the "evidence" his cult needs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2017, 09:23 PM
 
230 posts, read 115,297 times
Reputation: 258
Good let her testify. However, she did nothing wrong. Unmasking is not illegal. Leaking is illegal and she didn't leak anything. Some people seem to not know the difference between unmasking and leaking.

I want to hear what she has to say about what she knows about the Trump team collusion with Russia. Maybe we will actually find out useful information.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2017, 10:33 PM
 
Location: Ft. Myers
19,719 posts, read 16,869,746 times
Reputation: 41863
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanspeur View Post
Trump made the claim and that's all the "evidence" his cult needs.

Well, of course, and he has such an impeccable record of always telling the truth ! How could anyone ever doubt anything he says ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2017, 10:38 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,818 posts, read 19,511,295 times
Reputation: 9619
Quote:
Originally Posted by WilliamSmyth View Post
So far there is zero evidence that Obama spied on Trump.
zero evidence???

snowden provided all the proof that obozo and the NSA were spying on millions of amercans....illegally


what more proof do you want??



Obama and Hitlery should share a jail cell
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top