Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It's hard to take a source seriously when it says in big bold letters, "Politicus USA. Real Liberal Politics."
Not exactly an unbiased source there.
And on that note.........why should we believe any "evidence" produced by a rabid anti choice organization?......an organization that thinks nothing of breaking the law?.....an organization that thinks nothing of lying for the cause?
As you, a pro-lifer, said.....and I quote:
Quote:
The moment that abortions come into the picture, they've painted a giant bullseye on themselves and anti-abortion crowd will sabotage them at every turn."
Secondly it is sound public policy to allow women who want to abort their pregnancies to do so.
Better Federal dollars go towards abortion or birth control than for medical expenses, incarceration or welfare.
If someone is against abortion then please help young poor (often minority) women to make smart choices - this means better secondary education and above all better sex education along with readily available birth control.
I'm not sure why you quoted my post - I'm pro-choice.
The fact of the matter is that it is currently illegal to use Fed dollars to perform abortions. Period. This was my original response to someone stating how they didn't want "their tax dollars" going to pay for abortions at PP.
I think PP has a strong legal case. Their reputation was impugned by this group; the video was knowingly false and their were damages. The group also is not a news organization that is protected by the First Amendment.
I think PP has a strong legal case. Their reputation was impugned by this group; the video was knowingly false and their were damages. The group also is not a news organization that is protected by the First Amendment.
I mostly agree with you, but that has nothing to do with the Harris County grand jury.
Pretty sure refusing to charge them equals being exonerated.
By this Harris County grand jury at least. But taken in context with the states that have completed their investigations into the charge that PP has broken the laws regarding federal funding and/or the laws regarding fetal tissue also failing to find a reason to charge PP - I'd say that it is safe to conclude that if instances can be found of PP violating the laws in question, they are isolated cases that do not reflect an organizational policy of undermining and/or avoiding these laws.
Patheos website... notoriously anti-Christian, and often exaggerates and/or is wrong. Just saying...
There has been an increase in threats and vandalism towards PP clinics since the videos came out, many employees need body guards, damage to facilities. This was the US version of the Quran burning.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
