Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-06-2015, 04:25 PM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,336,309 times
Reputation: 8958

Advertisements

No one is going to hire a person for $15/hr to do a job that requires few skills and is only worth (to the employer) $5.50/hr (for example). That work will be redistributed to other departments/employees, increasing their work load. I have seen it happen.

The government cannot make such decree's and just expect business to roll over. Isn't going to happen.

Pay scales are set by the Market. That is as it should be.

Anyone who can't 'make it' on what they are now earning simply needs to learn new skills. It isn't as easy as it once was — largely because of government interference in the free market. Don't like it? Vote Republican!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-06-2015, 04:30 PM
 
6,394 posts, read 4,122,581 times
Reputation: 8253
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm View Post
well again, that depends, $15 per hour in new york city isnt much, where as $15 per hour in tucson az is a lot of money.
$15/hr is about $30K/year, which is about $21K/year after taxes. That's about $1700/month after taxes.

Is anyone going to argue that $1700/month is middle class living?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2015, 04:38 PM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,402,706 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post
No one is going to hire a person for $15/hr to do a job that requires few skills and is only worth (to the employer) $5.50/hr (for example). That work will be redistributed to other departments/employees, increasing their work load. I have seen it happen.

The government cannot make such decree's and just expect business to roll over. Isn't going to happen.

Pay scales are set by the Market. That is as it should be.

Anyone who can't 'make it' on what they are now earning simply needs to learn new skills. It isn't as easy as it once was — largely because of government interference in the free market. Don't like it? Vote Republican!
Ahh yes. The market. The market is apparently far more important to you then people are. Lets not lose sight of things. And lets talk about market health.

So lets say you are employing someone at $8/hr that earns you a net profit of $4/hr. Now lets say as time goes by and inflation rises....you start making $8/hr in net profit. Do you give the employee a raise? Of course not. Your profit has nothing to do with the pay of the employee.

But as time goes by you make more and more of the money...while the employee does not. Good for you right? well.....yes and no. The employees are also the customers. If you had increased the pay of your employee, it would have increased the speed of gains of everything. In the end you not paying your employee more results in you ending up with less in the end.....but it results in the employees gaining nothing.

Talking about market forces, and free markets is great. They work well in many ways. But...they should not be a religion. And your entire post treats them as a religion that should not be questioned. That no matter what...they should be this way.

Reality is that you are oversimplifying a complex reality, and making it into a argument that should not be questioned due to your unseasoned belief.

Its kind of interesting to see these sorts of arguments. Its just as valid as the ones that say "ignore past experiences, believe this because this is how it should work-ignoring that it doesn't actually work that way."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2015, 04:42 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,570,733 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
Ahh yes. The market. The market is apparently far more important to you then people are. Lets not lose sight of things. And lets talk about market health.

So lets say you are employing someone at $8/hr that earns you a net profit of $4/hr. Now lets say as time goes by and inflation rises....you start making $8/hr in net profit. Do you give the employee a raise? Of course not. Your profit has nothing to do with the pay of the employee.

But as time goes by you make more and more of the money...while the employee does not. Good for you right? well.....yes and no. The employees are also the customers. If you had increased the pay of your employee, it would have increased the speed of gains of everything. In the end you not paying your employee more results in you ending up with less in the end.....but it results in the employees gaining nothing.

Talking about market forces, and free markets is great. They work well in many ways. But...they should not be a religion. And your entire post treats them as a religion that should not be questioned. That no matter what...they should be this way.

Reality is that you are oversimplifying a complex reality, and making it into a argument that should not be questioned due to your unseasoned belief.

Its kind of interesting to see these sorts of arguments. Its just as valid as the ones that say "ignore past experiences, believe this because this is how it should work-ignoring that it doesn't actually work that way."
You took inflation into account when talking about profit but you didn't take it into account at all for the cost of the raw materials needed.
Inflation hits all around. Your rent may have gone up, your utilities may have gone up. You didn't account at all for the cost of doing business.

I sell my surplus chicken eggs. The cost of scratch, crumbles and egg cartons have all gone up over the past year.
I had to raise my price by $1 to offset those costs. I have no intention of operating at a loss. And I don't employ anybody.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2015, 04:44 PM
 
13,006 posts, read 18,931,239 times
Reputation: 9252
The real value of the minimum wage reached a peak in 1969, $9.00 in today's money. Of course back then the US was on top of the world.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2015, 04:45 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,570,733 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroWord View Post
$15/hr is about $30K/year, which is about $21K/year after taxes. That's about $1700/month after taxes.

Is anyone going to argue that $1700/month is middle class living?
For crying out loud..the MSM has called people on food stamps the " struggling middle class".
Everyone is middle class now or they are rich.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2015, 04:46 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,570,733 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by pvande55 View Post
The real value of the minimum wage reached a peak in 1969, $9.00 in today's money. Of course back then the US was on top of the world.
The US was a producer nation back then.

And economics tells you that producer nations are better off than consumer nations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2015, 04:49 PM
 
Location: MD's Eastern Shore
3,705 posts, read 4,861,819 times
Reputation: 6395
Quote:
Originally Posted by I love boots. View Post
I think 15 dollar amount minimum is a ridiculous idea. 15 dollars no matter what you do? The problem is, there are things I don't want to see go away because they are worth having, but the job isn't worth paying someone 15 dollars an hour to do. I'm in North Idaho and I think the best example I can think of is Silverwood our local amusement park. Most of the employees are seasonal and don't make anywhere near 15 bucks and hour. They hire people as young as 14 up to retired people that just want something to do. Open May thru Oct. Hundreds of people. I think a mandatory wage hike like that would cause the owner to close the park. Has anyone thought of this? These rich people that run places or own them, it is not going to be mandatory for them to keep that business in existence. If it isn't worth it financially to them it shuts down and those jobs are gone.

One can easily turn what your saying around and say that with a higher minimum, more people will be able to utilize those parks (they can be quite expensive) as more people will have a few more bucks to spend. More customers will make them want to keep their employees. They can anyway, right now they are charging 4 to 6 dollars for a med or lg coke filled completely with ice! 5 bucks for a regular hotdog. Those are prices now. They're not going up. Let the employees actually make something.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2015, 04:51 PM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,382,642 times
Reputation: 7990
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
So every time in the past that minimum wage was raised it hurt workers? Raised unemployment? this is a argument I hear over and over, and its nonsense. Theres no historical record of it. Its when people try a simple answer for a complex reality.

Because while minimum wage goes up....so does demand as those minimum wage workers spend more.

So look towards historical reality, not over simplistic nonsense.

Demand is not likely to go up as a result of raising the minimum wage. Again, this is basic supply/demand, and basic algebra. After we raise the minimum wage, the wage rate goes up, but the hours worked goes down. The overall demand (price (wage rate)*quantity(hours worked) is going to drop. It's econ 101 and algebra 101.

I live in Washington state where we passed a voter initiative for a high minimum wage that is bumped up every year per inflation. We have the highest minimum wage of any state (9.47/hr), unless you count D.C. @10.50/hr. None of my friends' teenage kids are able to get jobs. Why pay a 16-yr-old $9.47/hr when a 20-something, probably an immigrant, possibly with a family to support, will do that job, show up on time, and produce?
Washington youth unemployment is much higher than the national average. Think the minimum wage plays a role?

Some historical reality for you....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2015, 06:20 PM
 
Location: Athol, Idaho
2,181 posts, read 1,631,404 times
Reputation: 3220
Quote:
Originally Posted by marlinfshr View Post
One can easily turn what your saying around and say that with a higher minimum, more people will be able to utilize those parks (they can be quite expensive) as more people will have a few more bucks to spend. More customers will make them want to keep their employees. They can anyway, right now they are charging 4 to 6 dollars for a med or lg coke filled completely with ice! 5 bucks for a regular hotdog. Those are prices now. They're not going up. Let the employees actually make something.
You like to just totally make stuff up don't you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top