Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Should We Allow Robots?
Yes 61 82.43%
No 13 17.57%
Voters: 74. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-20-2014, 07:49 PM
 
Location: Rochester, NY
1,129 posts, read 1,361,375 times
Reputation: 392

Advertisements

"No" Debate

Amazon wants 10,000 robots on their floors by the end of the year. That could mean employees will be laid off for the robots. Amazon is also ruining stores (JCPenny, Sears, Best Buy, RadioShack, etc) which will involve B&M stores to shut down, with people losing jobs. After that, Amazon will hire more robots, which will leave more people out of work. Corporations are hiring robots so that they dont have to pay employees because of the billions they make isnt enough. It is a lose-lose situation, B&M stores will shut down and Amazon will continue to lay off employees. CEOs of Sears and other wont care, they are set for life. After that, Great Depression 2.0. And say those movies are true, and the robots rebel.

"Yes" Debate
With these robots, we could get packages in under a few hours. They are more efficient and less of a chance of human error. They will ship items faster and companies will thrive losing the need to pay employees.

What do you think?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-20-2014, 07:54 PM
 
Location: New York City
792 posts, read 639,382 times
Reputation: 348
I'm split on this issue. On one side, robots and automation are great. On the other, yes, people will lose their jobs. It's interesting because basically forever until now, new technology has created jobs or made existing ones easier, not outright replacing humans in those jobs.

I think that robots should be legal to perform basic stuff like sweeping, packaging, etc. But, we could have regulations on how many robots can be used in those roles. Or for every robot, the company needs to hire 1 or 2 humans.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2014, 08:00 PM
 
26,789 posts, read 15,349,869 times
Reputation: 14916
Yes we should allow robots -- it is ultimately the way of the future. Perhaps when automation grows the work week will shrink...and pay can stay the same.

Higher minimum wages will accelerate the already growing need for automation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2014, 08:00 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
12,287 posts, read 9,874,497 times
Reputation: 6509
I am fine with robots. It is part of a growing and changing economy. Anyone that thinks they can stop progress is sorely mistaken and will be left behind.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2014, 08:29 PM
 
Location: NJ
18,665 posts, read 20,057,498 times
Reputation: 7315
I'm fine with robots, but not with the manner in which they are treated for tax purposes. IMO , we should not allow robots to be treated as capital investments for either tax purposes or GAAP, but rather they should be required to be written off immediately as period expenses. There is NO reason to give the corps using them a tax benefit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2014, 08:56 PM
 
33,386 posts, read 35,041,791 times
Reputation: 20035
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobtn View Post
I'm fine with robots, but not with the manner in which they are treated for tax purposes. IMO , we should not allow robots to be treated as capital investments for either tax purposes or GAAP, but rather they should be required to be written off immediately as period expenses. There is NO reason to give the corps using them a tax benefit.
what difference between a robot and an automobile? or other piece of equipment? a capital expense is a capital expense, and they have a working life along with a salvage value. thus a depreciation allowance is in fact warranted.

but understand that robots are not going to completely replace humans beings. there are things humans can do that robots cant, and that is think outside the box and come up with creative solutions to problems. we already use robots in many areas, buildings new cars for instance. a robot welder and run 24/7 without a break, or without a mistake. same with a robot painter. but humans are still needed to install a lot of things that robots cant install.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2014, 08:58 PM
 
Location: NJ
18,665 posts, read 20,057,498 times
Reputation: 7315
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm View Post
what difference between a robot and an automobile? or other piece of equipment? a capital expense is a capital expense, and they have a working life along with a salvage value. thus a depreciation allowance is in fact warranted.

.
Wrong. We should be favoring a labor expense (people) over a robot. An automobile is not creating that tradeoff.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2014, 08:58 PM
 
45,473 posts, read 26,744,156 times
Reputation: 25227
Who is "we" and why should this we decide how a private business operates?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2014, 09:06 PM
 
Location: Victoria, BC.
33,647 posts, read 37,409,346 times
Reputation: 14112
Replacing people with robot workers on a large scale is not very smart, since people are customers, but robots buy nothing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2014, 09:09 PM
 
Location: California
11,466 posts, read 19,415,535 times
Reputation: 12713
The big question is, do we have a choice?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:13 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top