Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
How would you even know what is a hoax or not? You parrot garbage from denialist conspiracy websites as if it was factual and have proven you don't even understand what you are parroting.
Here's a question for you: Do you think the Theory of Evolution is a hoax invented by Satan?
Boomers grew up in a cold era, c. 1943-83 approximately. So when that ended they thought something was odd.
They didn't realize that there was an oscillation every 25-40 years.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed from California
Biggest scam ever perpetrated on a dumbed down public. It's nothing more than a get rich scheme and only fools and idiots believe it. Who do you think is backing your scientists so they reach a conclusion that humans have caused it?
A 7th grade science teacher knows better and so should you idiots who believe in manmade global warming.
Amazing how easily some people are duped by conspiracy theories about conspiracy theories.
The Koch brothers send you their love for willingly spreading denialist propaganda. You should ask for a cheque instead. Other people get paid quite a lot for doing what you do.
I find it very perplexing in trying to understand their motive for being so stupid for they must realize somewhere down in their conflicted selves that they are in fact, stupid unreasonable idiots.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gretsky99
You shouldn't be so hard on yourself!
Still waiting for you to tell us more about 14C and 10Be being a "species made from cosmic rays" like you posted earlier?
I believe in the general premise that adding Co2 to the atmosphere will increase global temps over time. The question is by how much and how long would it take for the "catastrophic" and "dire" predictions to come true? 100 years? 500 years?
As for the IPCC, seems to me that their confidence is ever increasing while their models are performing ever so poorly.
I don't have a lot of confidence in the opinions of "scientists" (like Roy Spencer) who are Creationists who believe that God created the earth for mankind and gave mankind Dominion over the earth.
I prefer to keep religious myths and science separate - unlike Roy.
Yet even a partial review of the emails is highly illuminating. In them, scientists appear to urge each other to present a "unified" view on the theory of man-made climate change while discussing the importance of the "common cause"; to advise each other on how to smooth over data so as not to compromise the favored hypothesis; to discuss ways to keep opposing views out of leading journals; and to give tips on how to "hide the decline" of temperature in certain inconvenient data.
Yet even a partial review of the emails is highly illuminating. In them, scientists appear to urge each other to present a "unified" view on the theory of man-made climate change while discussing the importance of the "common cause"; to advise each other on how to smooth over data so as not to compromise the favored hypothesis; to discuss ways to keep opposing views out of leading journals; and to give tips on how to "hide the decline" of temperature in certain inconvenient data.
Bottomline, man does the impact the planet. We have the ability to over fish the oceans and dwindle fish stocks, we have the ability to create large "dead zones" in our oceans that spans thousands of miles due to our agricultural processes, we have the ability to create mass extinctions (we are going through a mass extinction event right now due to loss of habitat); but I'm supposed to believe that our exponentially increasing population of 7 billion can't effect the climate?
Please...... I guess I didn't cash my check from the TRILLION dollar energy and manufacturing industries of the world.
Yet even a partial review of the emails is highly illuminating. In them, scientists appear to urge each other to present a "unified" view on the theory of man-made climate change while discussing the importance of the "common cause"; to advise each other on how to smooth over data so as not to compromise the favored hypothesis; to discuss ways to keep opposing views out of leading journals; and to give tips on how to "hide the decline" of temperature in certain inconvenient data.
Come up north and try telling the Inuit it's a hoax. You'll be lucky to escape with your life.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
New York Post: Global Warming 'Proof' Is Evaporating
