Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You know, I don't really read anything about global warming because it's just common sense to me. No cult, just common sense. What man puts into the air, water and dirt affects our planet. So why do you need proof. Man has done great harm to the earth and will continue to do so because some are too arrogant to care.
Well if you believe that why don't you all put a gun to your heads and save mother earth.
Why don't you try telling that to MIT Climate Scientist Dr. Richard Lindzen.
"The latest IPCC report has truly sunk to level of hilarious incoherence. They are proclaiming increased confidence in their models as the discrepancies between their models and observations increase."
I see no research to back his claim, just a statement. I have no more reason to believe him than I do you. It's really sad to see what the right calls science. Now go read your little tabloid. It will enable you to live the fantasy that your political masters aren't dolts. All you need is a little faith.
I see no research to back his claim, just a statement. I have no more reason to believe him than I do you. It's really sad to see what the right calls science. Now go read your little tabloid. It will enable you to live the fantasy that your political masters aren't dolts. All you need is a little faith.
Thanks for the advise Mr. Engineer now go play with your lego set.
I don't know if you are a liar or not. But you show in the below post that you don't know enough to know when you are blindly parroting the lies and misrepresentations of others. You also show that you have't read the original published articles yourself.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gretsky99
Hansen published a National Academy of Sciences paper, in 2000, which stated that the warming since 1960 was due to CFCs.
A paper published in 2013 by Canadian scientists agreed, and both agreed that warming probably slow or stop by about a decade ago.
What paper was that? You mean Qin-Bin Lu's? He's a physicist not a climate scientist and his hypothesis, which was published in a Physics Journal, has already been proven to be wrong by climate scientists.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gretsky99
Borehole and ice core data indicate warming began 500 years ago, before man had any influence at all.
What "Borehole and ice core data"? Source?
Quote:
Originally Posted by gretsky99
Hansen now refutes his own published papers, and, AGAIN, says that global warming is due to CO2.
There was no 'refuting'. You were incorrect about what he said in the first place.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gretsky99
14C and 10Be indicate that GW is related to solar cycles, warming and cooling tracking concentrations of these species made from cosmic rays, which enhance cloud formation, cooling the Earth. Certain scientists put this process on a quantitative footing recently.
That sentence didn't even make sense at all. 14C and 10Be are a "species made from cosmic rays"? That's hilarious.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gretsky99
In the past 15 years, even Hansen's former Goddard Space Institute published data showing the globe has not warmed, but cooled slightly (in agreement with the Hadley Centre in England). Both, however, choose to dismiss or ignore their own data since it does not agree with their total faith in GW.
This past year saw the most LOW temperature records in 20 years, and more low than high temperature records. That is characteristic of "cooling", not warming.
"The combined global land and ocean average surface temperature for the January–October period (year-to-date) was 0.60°C (1.08°F) above the 20th century average of 14.1°C (57.4°F). The first ten months of 2013 ranked as the seventh warmest such period on record."
BTW, the past year in Australia saw the hottest 12 months on record and we had an unseasonally early bushfires in October.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gretsky99
Hansen's prediction is not working well, again and again, except for Gore and others profiting from Hansen's warnings, who are getting richer, again and again.
Hansen's GW assertion has all the earmarks of "pathological" science.
Yeah everyone is making a profit and getting rich except those poor Koch brothers and ExxonMobil and denialist 'think tanks' like the Heartland Institute.
Your post has all the earmarks of 'parroted denialist pseudo science and propaganda'.
You know, I don't really read anything about global warming because it's just common sense to me. No cult, just common sense. What man puts into the air, water and dirt affects our planet. So why do you need proof. Man has done great harm to the earth and will continue to do so because some are too arrogant to care.
Man is causing great harm to the earth but it's the global governments who are responsible. Just look into the skies and you can see the daily geoengineering operations which are causing great harm to us and our environment. The other system at work that you can't easily see are disrupting the normal earth magnetic field which is a great threat to life on earth. The severe weather that is causing much death and destruction in the world is man-made by these exotic systems at the hands of global governments.
Mind Boggling Incompetence Or Fraud At NOAA
NOAA shows that summer 2012 had the second hottest afternoons in US history, just behind 1936. This is complete nonsense.
Mind Boggling Incompetence Or Fraud At NOAA
NOAA shows that summer 2012 had the second hottest afternoons in US history, just behind 1936. This is complete nonsense.
Got anything that is NOT from a denialist website parroting propaganda and misrepresentation?
Your entitled to your opinion. You want to believe in a hoax that's your business!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.