Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 11-13-2013, 08:57 AM
 
1,963 posts, read 1,824,593 times
Reputation: 844

Advertisements

Lets say apples cost $10.
Theres 100 people who need apples, but only 50 people are paying for every person to have one.
So each person paying is paying double what they should have to.
The government passes a law saying everyone needs to contribute into the apple fund, thereby distributing the costs more evenly across the populace. The law also has regulations concerning what the apple corporation is allowed to charge per apple.
In response to the new costs the business is taking on, it attempts to protect profits by scaring everyone into thinking apple prices will skyrocket if the law is passed (and even years afterward).

I'm not sure whats so difficult to understand about this. With everyone paying into the system, its cheaper for everyone. The multi-trillion dollar healthcare industry knows this, but also knows its profits will take a dive when they are forced to insure people who might actually get sick.

Costs are going to rise initially, then fall, and stabilize. Its basic mathematics.

 
Old 11-13-2013, 09:00 AM
 
Location: Maryland
7,816 posts, read 6,400,385 times
Reputation: 9975
Except that people are paying different prices for the same apple, even the ones who don't eat apples.
 
Old 11-13-2013, 09:00 AM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,220,208 times
Reputation: 7875
Basic math typically is beyond the right wingers' grasp.
 
Old 11-13-2013, 09:00 AM
 
Location: In your head, rent free
14,888 posts, read 10,049,208 times
Reputation: 7693
That's the stupidest attempt at explaining this horrible legislation that I've seen so far. Bravo my good man, bravo.
 
Old 11-13-2013, 09:01 AM
 
46,319 posts, read 27,152,415 times
Reputation: 11135
You do understand 30,000,000 will still be uninsured....

Nope, guess not....
 
Old 11-13-2013, 09:04 AM
 
30,083 posts, read 18,694,395 times
Reputation: 20902
Quote:
Originally Posted by k.smith904 View Post
Lets say apples cost $10.
Theres 100 people who need apples, but only 50 people are paying for every person to have one.
So each person paying is paying double what they should have to.
The government passes a law saying everyone needs to contribute into the apple fund, thereby distributing the costs more evenly across the populace. The law also has regulations concerning what the apple corporation is allowed to charge per apple.
In response to the new costs the business is taking on, it attempts to protect profits by scaring everyone into thinking apple prices will skyrocket if the law is passed (and even years afterward).

I'm not sure whats so difficult to understand about this. With everyone paying into the system, its cheaper for everyone. The multi-trillion dollar healthcare industry knows this, but also knows its profits will take a dive when they are forced to insure people who might actually get sick.

Costs are going to rise initially, then fall, and stabilize. Its basic mathematics.

?????

You have it completely backwards, as we would expect of a liberal.

When there is a limited supply (healthcare) and there is a marked increase in demand (more insured), prices go up. It is what we call "supply and demand". Is that simple enough for you?

Now if we charge people who do not utilize or need healthcare (the young) to pay for the healthcare that others need (older patients and those with medical problems), we are asking a group of citizens to pay for something they do not want or need. That is what we call a protection racket- corercion to pay for nothing or suffer a penalty (I will break your legs or burn your business). Others (liberals) might call this a "wealth redistribution plan", which is exactly what Obamacare is. Obamacare has little to do with implementing healthcare and covering lives (as we have seen) but has more to do with raising premium costs and deductibles for those currently with insurance, redistributing wealth to others.

If the above was not so, then why in the world were the 40 million "uninsured" not simply rolled into Medicare?
 
Old 11-13-2013, 09:06 AM
 
Location: Fredericktown,Ohio
7,168 posts, read 5,371,754 times
Reputation: 2922
And the OP needs to explain who is going to pay for the apples that the free loaders are eating? And why the free loaders are first in line at the apple cart?
 
Old 11-13-2013, 09:06 AM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,878,020 times
Reputation: 20030
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
Basic math typically is beyond the right wingers' grasp.
that is perhaps THE stupidest thing you have ever said.
 
Old 11-13-2013, 09:09 AM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,220,208 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
You do understand 30,000,000 will still be uninsured....

Nope, guess not....
Better than 50 million people uninsured and 129 million people with pre-existing conditions. Shame the Republicans tried so hard to block the other 30 million people from also being covered.
 
Old 11-13-2013, 09:10 AM
 
Location: Fredericktown,Ohio
7,168 posts, read 5,371,754 times
Reputation: 2922
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm View Post
that is perhaps THE stupidest thing you have ever said.
That is not true that statement is not even in the top ten
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top