Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-14-2013, 07:48 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,199,011 times
Reputation: 17209

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by txtqueen View Post
You guys are all wrong. I can go in my phone right now, delete my calls from the last hour and my texts from the last hour under a minute.

If I was texting and driving and I hit someone and I knew that the cops would check my phone like that, I would have them deleted before the cop got there.
Your service provider still has a record of all of this. Besides, many times someone in an accident is not able to access their phone and start deleting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-14-2013, 07:51 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,199,011 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by geofra View Post
You surrender your breath to a breathelizer if your suspected of drunk driving. Is there a 4th Amendment issue there?
Probable cause. You have to first fail a number of physical tests. Even then it must be proven in court.

I do not think many would argue against the idea that if there is an accident and there is some sort of actual proof that a person was on their phone that the police should not be able to access your records with a court order to show you were distracted at the time of the accident.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2013, 07:57 AM
 
78,417 posts, read 60,613,724 times
Reputation: 49719
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Yep. Go to a court, present probable cause and get them to instruct the service provider to provide your records.
Exactly.

Also, it just seems strange to me that you just got in an accident and probably need to let your family know what happened, arrange for a tow truck, a ride home etc.....and how long would they keep your phone? If it means taking it for weeks or even a few days is crippling to some people that need it for work, life etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2013, 07:59 AM
 
78,417 posts, read 60,613,724 times
Reputation: 49719
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Your service provider still has a record of all of this. Besides, many times someone in an accident is not able to access their phone and start deleting.
There are also a lot of people have apps that mask your texts or hide them so that people won't know you are cheating or up to something illegal if they want to peek at your phone. Those are also the kinds of people that tend to screw up and get in accidents and drive while texting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2013, 08:00 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,199,011 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy View Post
Exactly.

Also, it just seems strange to me that you just got in an accident and probably need to let your family know what happened, arrange for a tow truck, a ride home etc.....and how long would they keep your phone? If it means taking it for weeks or even a few days is crippling to some people that need it for work, life etc.
Yeah, I hadn't considered that. I could certainly see cases where someone gets into an accident and wants to call someone. The officer see's the person remove the phone from their pocket or purse and then demands that it be turned over.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2013, 08:01 AM
 
4,837 posts, read 4,167,640 times
Reputation: 1848
Quote:
Originally Posted by 43north87west View Post
This law does absolutely nothing to save lives or to address problems related to distracted driving.
Well if it proves you were texting at the time of the accident, I suppose you'd be arrested if texting & driving is illegal in that state, right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2013, 08:03 AM
 
Location: Missouri
4,272 posts, read 3,787,918 times
Reputation: 1937
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Yeah, I hadn't considered that. I could certainly see cases where someone gets into an accident and wants to call someone. The officer see's the person remove the phone from their pocket or purse and then demands that it be turned over.
That brings up a question. Will the phone be confiscated if the officer sees it out? If that is all it takes for probable cause then this law is overreaching.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2013, 08:08 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,791,864 times
Reputation: 24863
I have no fear of people reading what or who I have texted or called and when these happened. If requested I would turn my phone over to a policeman if I were involved in an accident because the only way I would be using a phone in that situation would be to call 911.

So what are all of you law abiding citizens afraid of?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2013, 08:10 AM
 
Location: TX
6,486 posts, read 6,388,858 times
Reputation: 2628
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Probable cause would be if there were witnesses that saw them talking on the phone. Probable cause would not be simply because there was an accident.
This would be reasonable, but is it written anywhere this way in relation to this new law? This is much like the controversy over DUI checkpoints. Constitution aside, some people are OK with it because they assume and/or they are told that the police there must abide by certain guidelines in determining who to stop and search. In reality, there may be very few restrictions (that are actually enforced, mind you) on the practice. If this law doesn't spell out what would be considered "probable cause", I'd be leary of it personally.

Last edited by Vic 2.0; 06-14-2013 at 08:18 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2013, 08:18 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,199,011 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
I have no fear of people reading what or who I have texted or called and when these happened. If requested I would turn my phone over to a policeman if I were involved in an accident because the only way I would be using a phone in that situation would be to call 911.

So what are all of you law abiding citizens afraid of?
I stated what could be a concern. As we have seen the last few months also, when we give up our rights the government can't resist then abusing their new found tactics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top