Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-13-2013, 01:05 AM
 
9,659 posts, read 10,234,345 times
Reputation: 3225

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robin Rossi View Post
Because it existed for untold hundreds of millions of years before man ever walked the earth.
Man has definitely changed not only the atmosphere, but the landscape....


...Not to mention that they drained out an entire inland sea (The Aral Sea)

...That's some ****ing climate change, right? going from a sea to ****ing desert?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-13-2013, 01:08 AM
 
Location: Va. Beach
6,391 posts, read 5,171,831 times
Reputation: 2283
It's Bush's fault.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2013, 01:36 AM
 
9,659 posts, read 10,234,345 times
Reputation: 3225
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkatt View Post
It's Bush's fault.
Not everything is Bush's fault. Obamabots don't understand that, but ignore them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2013, 09:12 AM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,467,741 times
Reputation: 6541
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordBalfor View Post
Clearly you lack comprehension skills.

1) We KNOW that excess CO2 traps heat and raises temps - because we've seen it happen BEFORE naturally
2) We are creating excess CO2.
3) We are seeing rising temps.
Hmmmmm......


It shouldn't take a genius to figure out the scenario (though apparently it DOES take someone who is NOT a wingnut).
Try to keep up.

Ken
1) We know that increasing temperatures releases CO2, not the other way around. It is the water vapor that traps heat, not the CO2.

2) What is considered "excess" CO2? A healthy adult human will exhale 40,000 ppm of CO2. Is that excessive? Office buildings are typically in the 600 ppm to 900 ppm range for CO2. Is that excessive?

3) Would you rather we see dropping temperatures? One thing you can absolutely count on is that the planet's climate is never static.

If does not take a genius, but it obviously requires more than a Democrat pushing a Marxist agenda.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2013, 09:19 AM
 
Location: Japan
15,292 posts, read 7,766,886 times
Reputation: 10006
Quote:
We know that increasing temperatures releases CO2, not the other way around. It is the water vapor that traps heat, not the CO2.
Right? We know that. Will those loser Marxists publishing nonsense in peer reviewed journals ever catch on? Sheesh.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2013, 09:21 AM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,467,741 times
Reputation: 6541
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCforever View Post
Don't we try to control forest fires even for those caused by nature? Shouldn't we try to keep warming from raising sea levels?
That depends on whether private property is being threatened or not.

I would not worry about rising sea levels as much as shutting down the thermohaline circulation of the oceans. If the current thermohaline circulation is interrupted or altered, it could plummet western Europe and the eastern and western US coasts into much colder winter temperatures.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2013, 12:57 PM
 
Location: Planet earth
3,617 posts, read 1,823,745 times
Reputation: 1258
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHurricaneKid View Post
Ants, buffalo, cats, pigs, wind, rain, solar activity, etc. have definitely changed not only the atmosphere, but the landscape....
and your point was? Oh... your point was to blame on man things that happen NATURALLY, via NATURE... I understand. Or at least I should say, "I hear you man." because I certainly don't agree with what you are implying.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2013, 02:07 PM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,346,065 times
Reputation: 7627
Quote:
Originally Posted by KS_Referee View Post
You mean that same NASA that has that "Hide the decline" Jim Hansen guy? THAT NASA? LOL!!!

Have you EVER heard of Climategate?

The dude along with several of his associates in the department that was/is making these BS claims was caught RED HANDED in his own emails conspiring to commit scientific fraud, yet somehow we are suppose to hold him and his agency up as the standard bearer? I don't think so.

I forgot to mention the very same NASA liars that tried to OMIT the high temperatures of the 1930's from the records?
You mean the Climategate that was DEBUNKED?

Funny how FOX News etc left THAT PART out.

Debunking Misinformation About Stolen Climate Emails in the "Climategate" Manufactured Controversy | Union of Concerned Scientists

Ken
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2013, 02:08 PM
 
3,740 posts, read 3,073,967 times
Reputation: 895
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHurricaneKid View Post
Man has definitely changed not only the atmosphere, but the landscape....


...Not to mention that they drained out an entire inland sea (The Aral Sea)

...That's some ****ing climate change, right? going from a sea to ****ing desert?
So what. You act as if it matters.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2013, 02:20 PM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,346,065 times
Reputation: 7627
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robin Rossi View Post
So what. You act as if it matters.
It matters if your argument is "Man can't change anything" - which seems to be the case with you folks.


Man has changed a LOT of things - ever hear of the DUST BOWL. Do you even have clue as to WHY it happened?

Ken
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top