If George W. Bush Is Accountable For 9/11, Then Barack Obama Is Accountable For the Boston Bombings (terrorist, visa)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yes to the left wing nut jobs number matters. It avoids the fact we were attack by terrorists.
wishing for my death to add to the body count shows your hate and complete ability to ignore we were attacked
You're inconsequential. I neither wish for your death nor do I waste the emotion of hate on you.
You're simply being far too cavalier about the numbers. Numbers matter whether you wanna admit it or not.
Because we think 3,000 people dying is much worse than 4 people dying?
Really?
I don't think anyone is arguing about that, but think of what could have happened if all the bombs had gone off or if, indeed they had succeeded with hitting NYC? No matter how we look at it, but acts were acts of terrorists and the question is: was Bush responsible for 9/11 but Obama not for Boston?
I don't think anyone is arguing about that, but think of what could have happened if all the bombs had gone off or if, indeed they had succeeded with hitting NYC? No matter how we look at it, but acts were acts of terrorists and the question is: was Bush responsible for 9/11 but Obama not for Boston?
Does it really matter? Regardless of whom we attempt to blame, the dead aren't coming back and the act of terror can't be undone.
Liberals have held since 9/12/2001 that the Bush Administration was aware of the 9/11 terrorists beforehand, and therefore the blame rests with him for not preventing it. Whether it is true or not, this is long-held liberal belief. In fact, many liberals right here on this forum have alluded to Bush's complicity on numerous occasions. No reason to try deny it. There's too much evidence to the contrary.
Accordingly, the evidence is clear that the Barack Obama Administration was fully aware of the Boston Bombers. It was his Administration that placed the elder bomber on a terrorist watch list. It was his Administration that fielded a tip from Russia. It was his Administration that interviewed the elder bomber. It was his Administration that dropped the ball.
Therefore, it's time to throw liberal ideology back in the faces of the irrational and irresponsible liberals who have consistently and persistently blamed George W. Bush for 9/11.
The blood of Boston is on the hands of none other than Barack Hussein Obama. And don't you forget it.
Who said he wasn't?
And does that apply the other way as well? If Obama is responsible for the underwear bomber is Bush responsible for the shoe bomber? If Clinton and Obama are responsible for embassies attacked under their watch is Bush responsible for embassies attacked under his watch? If Bush gets credit for getting Saddam does Obama get credit for getting bin Laden?
9-11 was already in the final stages of preparation when Bush took office thanks to Clinton who refused to dirty his hands with al Qaeda.
Obama has been in office for four years and had lots of warnings about the older brother, but they dropped the ball.
Clinton was hunting for bin Laden and he warned Bush about him. Bush called off the hunt because he, and a lot of other Republicans, thought that they were so big and bad that the terrorists would never dare attack while they were in charge
It was my understanding that Bush was "warned" ahead of time, with sufficient detail that "problem behaviors" might have been avoided. I haven't heard that Obama was warned in any way ahead of the Boston bombings.
He knew they were thinking of using planes. That was actually in the title of one of the reports. It may have helped if they had had the airplanes close and lock the cockpit doors. Before 9/11 it wasn't at all unusual for the cockpit doors to be not only unlocked but even open
Clinton was hunting for bin Laden and he warned Bush about him. Bush called off the hunt because he, and a lot of other Republicans, thought that they were so big and bad that the terrorists would never dare attack while they were in charge
remember all the lefty hecklers who said that Condi Rice was to blame because she ignored a briefing about 'Bin Laden determined to attack' in US.
Good for the goose, good for the gander. Certainly we are now learning that there were red flags regarding Tamerlan Tsarnaev that were available to the Obama admin. But were ignored.
I wouldn't blame either. They doubtless get a mountain of tips and warnings that they have to sift through. But good for the goose, good for the gander.
Obama didn't ignore them. He, or the CIA or whoever, looked into it and didn't find anything
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
