Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-24-2013, 03:55 PM
 
3,040 posts, read 2,587,197 times
Reputation: 665

Advertisements

44 Democrats apparently do not care about the Bill of Rights either...
At least there were a few smart ones.

YEAs ---(voted against)



Alexander (R-TN)
Ayotte (R-NH)
Barrasso (R-WY)
Begich (D-AK)
Blunt (R-MO)
Boozman (R-AR)
Burr (R-NC)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Coats (R-IN)
Coburn (R-OK)
Cochran (R-MS)
Collins (R-ME)
Corker (R-TN)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Crapo (R-ID)
Cruz (R-TX)
Donnelly (D-IN)
Enzi (R-WY)


Fischer (R-NE)
Flake (R-AZ)
Graham (R-SC)
Grassley (R-IA)
Hagan (D-NC)
Hatch (R-UT)
Heinrich (D-NM)
Heitkamp (D-ND)
Heller (R-NV)
Hoeven (R-ND)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Isakson (R-GA)
Johanns (R-NE)
Johnson (R-WI)
Kirk (R-IL)
Lee (R-UT)
Manchin (D-WV)
McCain (R-AZ)


McConnell (R-KY)
Moran (R-KS)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Paul (R-KY)
Portman (R-OH)
Pryor (D-AR)
Risch (R-ID)
Roberts (R-KS)
Rubio (R-FL)
Scott (R-SC)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shelby (R-AL)
Tester (D-MT)
Thune (R-SD)
Toomey (R-PA)
Vitter (R-LA)
Wicker (R-MS)





NAYs ---46



Baldwin (D-WI)
Baucus (D-MT)
Bennet (D-CO)
Blumenthal (D-CT)
Boxer (D-CA)
Brown (D-OH)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Cardin (D-MD)
Carper (D-DE)
Casey (D-PA)
Coons (D-DE)
Cowan (D-MA)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Franken (D-MN)
Gillibrand (D-NY)


Harkin (D-IA)
Hirono (D-HI)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kaine (D-VA)
King (I-ME)
Klobuchar (D-MN)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
McCaskill (D-MO)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Merkley (D-OR)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murphy (D-CT)
Murray (D-WA)
Nelson (D-FL)


Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Sanders (I-VT)
Schatz (D-HI)
Schumer (D-NY)
Shaheen (D-NH)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Udall (D-CO)
Udall (D-NM)
Warner (D-VA)
Warren (D-MA)
Whitehouse (D-RI)
Wyden (D-OR)





Not Voting - 1


Lautenberg (D-NJ)


http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LI...00091#position
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-24-2013, 04:02 PM
 
3,040 posts, read 2,587,197 times
Reputation: 665
47 Scumbags in the Senate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2013, 04:05 PM
 
7,359 posts, read 5,478,044 times
Reputation: 3142
I have to hear is "United Nations" to know I am against whatever it may be.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2013, 04:13 PM
 
Location: Baltimore
8,299 posts, read 8,627,744 times
Reputation: 3663
Very frightening how easily people swallow down NRA and right-wing propaganda. This Treaty would have ZERO effect on the 2nd Amendment. Did you even bother to read the document? "Private actors" are not subject to the treaty.

How embarrassing that the Yea votes sided with China, Russia, and France.

"Some 108 countries, led by Mexico, issued a joint statement on Monday saying "the overwhelming majority of (U.N.) Member States agree with us on the necessity and the urgency of adopting a strong Arms Trade Treaty. Our voice must be heard." Among that statement's supporters were major arms producers Britain and Germany. The other four top arms exporters - the United States, Russia, China and France - did not endorse it."
What's at stake in U.N. arms trade treaty negotiations? | Reuters
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2013, 04:46 PM
 
3,040 posts, read 2,587,197 times
Reputation: 665
Whats it got to do with the NRA??
And yes it would have impacted the 2A.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2013, 05:04 PM
 
Location: Baltimore
8,299 posts, read 8,627,744 times
Reputation: 3663
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jean71 View Post
Whats it got to do with the NRA??
And yes it would have impacted the 2A.
I'll take that as a 'no'. You haven't read the treaty.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2013, 05:17 PM
 
3,040 posts, read 2,587,197 times
Reputation: 665
Quote:
Originally Posted by helenejen View Post
I'll take that as a 'no'. You haven't read the treaty.

Yeh I have.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2013, 05:20 PM
 
48,493 posts, read 97,081,283 times
Reputation: 18310
Isn't goig anyhwere then like so many UN proposals.Back to deabting institution again like it really is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2013, 05:27 PM
 
Location: Eastern NC
20,868 posts, read 23,635,914 times
Reputation: 18815
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jean71 View Post
Whats it got to do with the NRA??
And yes it would have impacted the 2A.
So just how would it affect the 2A?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2013, 05:28 PM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,814,580 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by helenejen View Post
Very frightening how easily people swallow down NRA and right-wing propaganda. This Treaty would have ZERO effect on the 2nd Amendment. Did you even bother to read the document? "Private actors" are not subject to the treaty.
I agree. It is frightening our politicians have no clue what they are voting for or against. This bill was worded "to uphold the 2nd amendment......", but it is bullcrap, because no UN treaty can overrule the 2nd amendment or any other amendment. It seems our politicians vote on pure emotion and hit YEA, or NAY based on how the the topic of the bill is worded.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top