Republicans up in arms over female secret service agent (parade, Obama, 2013)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Reported in the daily mail, a noted right leaning site. They even circled the woman.
Please stop embarrassing the rest of us. The Mail Online is the website of the British tabloid the Daily Mail established in 1896. It is hardly a right wing website.
As for the story, I can't find a single sentence that could possibly be described as being "up in arms" over a female Secret Service Agent. The story in even for tabloid standards briefly summarizes the history of woman participants in the parade and a even briefer mention that if more women had been a part of the detail in the past there might not have been a Secret Service prostitution scandal.
I writing this because I spend more time than I care to, pointing out the idiotic posts of right wing contributors who mischaracterize a story or don't even take the time to read it. So I will not tolerate the same shoddy posting from members of the left.
The idiots are out in force....I see nothing about her being in the wrong...its pointing out that she was there...big freaking deal....I saw more than 1 woman there...who cares!
Please stop embarrassing the rest of us. The Mail Online is the website of the British tabloid the Daily Mail established in 1896. It is hardly a right wing website.
As for the story, I can't find a single sentence that could possibly be described as being "up in arms" over a female Secret Service Agent. The story in even for tabloid standards briefly summarizes the history of woman participants in the parade and a even briefer mention that if more women had been a part of the detail in the past there might not have been a Secret Service prostitution scandal.
I writing this because I spend more time than I care to, pointing out the idiotic posts of right wing contributors who mischaracterize a story or don't even take the time to read it. So I will not tolerate the same shoddy posting from members of the left.
The idiots are out in force....I see nothing about her being in the wrong...its pointing out that she was there...big freaking deal....I saw more than 1 woman there...who cares!
Please stop embarrassing the rest of us. The Mail Online is the website of the British tabloid the Daily Mail established in 1896. It is hardly a right wing website.
As for the story, I can't find a single sentence that could possibly be described as being "up in arms" over a female Secret Service Agent. The story in even for tabloid standards briefly summarizes the history of woman participants in the parade and a even briefer mention that if more women had been a part of the detail in the past there might not have been a Secret Service prostitution scandal.
I writing this because I spend more time than I care to, pointing out the idiotic posts of right wing contributors who mischaracterize a story or don't even take the time to read it. So I will not tolerate the same shoddy posting from members of the left.
The Daily Mail is a conservative website, but I do agree that I don't see Republicans up in arms about this, especially since the Daily Mail is a British website.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
There is no right leaning Brits anymore either.