Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-02-2013, 01:40 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,788,452 times
Reputation: 4174

Advertisements

This is a newspaper that has long campaigned against the right of the people to keep and bear arms.

Now they feel threatened themselves, although there have been no threats in all the massive mail they have received after publishing the names and addresses of gun permit holders.

Their solution? Get some guns!

(Restrictions for thee but not for me!)

--------------------------------------------------------

The Journal News is Armed and Dangerous | The Rockland County Times

The Journal News is Armed and Dangerous

Posted January 1st, 2013

ROCKLAND COUNTY TIMES EXCLUSIVE

Armed guards from RGA Investigations have taken up post at the Journal News’ Rockland County headquarters

BY DYLAN SKRILOFF

Journal News' Rockland headquarters in West Nyack, Town of Clarkstown

Guns are good for the goose but NOT for the gander.



[update---Putnam County officials have since announced their intention to not comply with the Journal News' request for the names and addresses of pistol permit holders]

Last edited by CaseyB; 01-02-2013 at 01:51 PM.. Reason: copyright - too long
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-02-2013, 01:43 PM
 
Location: 9851 Meadowglen Lane, Apt 42, Houston Texas
3,168 posts, read 2,064,431 times
Reputation: 368
Someone should publish the names, addresses, telephone numbers, of the people responsible for the article.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2013, 01:44 PM
 
Location: Maryland
7,814 posts, read 6,395,954 times
Reputation: 9975
Quote:
Originally Posted by zombieApocExtraordinaire View Post
Someone should publish the names, addresses, telephone numbers, of the people responsible for the article.
A blogger has already done that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2013, 01:53 PM
 
Location: One of the 13 original colonies.
10,190 posts, read 7,958,896 times
Reputation: 8114
Blogger publishes names, addresses of newspaper staff after gun-permit database | Fox News



Blogger publishes the names of the Newspaper employees.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2013, 02:01 PM
 
8,560 posts, read 6,411,358 times
Reputation: 1173
I would think that gun owners would not have a problem with that information being made public. Isn't the usual argument made that if criminals know you have a gun or guns, they'll skip your house, or business, or school, or restaurant in your neighborhood and go somewhere else? So now they have a registry of gun owners so they can avoid any criminal activity in those homes/areas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2013, 02:05 PM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,369,310 times
Reputation: 7990
I think the prohibitionist impulse can be a almost a mental disorder. How else do we account for this level of logical disconnect? I don't see how.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2013, 02:06 PM
 
Location: Jacksonville, FL
11,142 posts, read 10,716,540 times
Reputation: 9799
Quote:
Originally Posted by FancyFeast5000 View Post
I would think that gun owners would not have a problem with that information being made public. Isn't the usual argument made that if criminals know you have a gun or guns, they'll skip your house, or business, or school, or restaurant in your neighborhood and go somewhere else? So now they have a registry of gun owners so they can avoid any criminal activity in those homes/areas.
On the flip side, now the criminals know who isn't registered to own a handgun, which gives them a much better guess at the safe houses to break into.

I'm not even going to get into the invasion of privacy issue, since that should be apparent to anyone with common sense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2013, 02:14 PM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,369,310 times
Reputation: 7990
Quote:
Originally Posted by FancyFeast5000 View Post
I would think that gun owners would not have a problem with that information being made public. Isn't the usual argument made that if criminals know you have a gun or guns, they'll skip your house, or business, or school, or restaurant in your neighborhood and go somewhere else? So now they have a registry of gun owners so they can avoid any criminal activity in those homes/areas.

Seriously??

Obviously this is true for home invasion or armed robbery. In that case the criminal would prefer that the occupants be unarmed.

But when it comes to burglary of an unoccupied building, having the information public could make one a target for burglary. I'd think that would be obvious.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2013, 02:26 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,074,696 times
Reputation: 17865
Quote:
Originally Posted by FancyFeast5000 View Post
I would think that gun owners would not have a problem with that information being made public. Isn't the usual argument made that if criminals know you have a gun or guns, they'll skip your house, or business, or school, or restaurant in your neighborhood and go somewhere else? So now they have a registry of gun owners so they can avoid any criminal activity in those homes/areas.
As I've pointed out in the other thread suppose the next Adam Lanza who couldn't legally obtain guns uses this list to steal weapons and them massacre a bunch of school kids?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2013, 02:30 PM
 
8,560 posts, read 6,411,358 times
Reputation: 1173
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimRom View Post
On the flip side, now the criminals know who isn't registered to own a handgun, which gives them a much better guess at the safe houses to break into.

I'm not even going to get into the invasion of privacy issue, since that should be apparent to anyone with common sense.
Is a license or whatever it is to buy/own a gun a private record, like your birth certificate, your medical records, etc?

Yeah, well, that has been the pro-gun-ownership argument all along, that owning a gun keeps the criminals away, makes you safer. Guess those who don't own guns will find out in that area. I still don't understand why the gun owners are so upset, seems that they like for people to know they own guns.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top