Famous Judge Who Agreed With Sheriff Arpaio's Investigation Into Obama's Birth Certificate To Hear Eligibility Case

[Arus]

And like with every birther case, it will be dismissed as moot, since the election already happened, votes counted, electoral college voted, and congress affirmed.

You folks are now 3 months too late.

[wrecking ball]

Originally Posted by Old Army Soldier

This should be very interesting to watch..

yep. i already made note of it in another thread ( either the cruz or rubio birther thread ).

i predict that the odds are 50/50 over whether the birthers claim the judge was "got to" or they claim he is a "traitor" when the decision comes down.

[legalsea]

Originally Posted by Old Army Soldier

Update: Get The Popcorn Ready: Obama Eligibility Appeal Case Winds Up In Alabama Supreme Court With Established Birther Judges

This should be very interesting to watch. The newly elected Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court is Roy Moore and he has expressed doubts of where Obama was born. Also it has another Justice named Tom Parker who has gone on record arguing that McInnish’s charges of “forgery” on Obama's 'Short Form' birth certificate and 'Long Form' birth certificate were legitimate cause for concern mainly due to Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Maricopa County Sheriff Office investigation conclusions. Justice Parker wrote on March 27, 2012:


"Mclnnish has attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the "short form" and the "long form" birth certificates of President Barack Hussein Obama that have been made public"



Here is the well written strong appellate brief to the Alabama Supreme Court:
SCOAL 2013-03-26 - McInnish|Goode v Chapman - Brief of Appellant

Story:
WND » Obama eligibility appeal in Roy Moore’s court » Print

Excerpt:

Chief Justice Moore is on the record questioning Obama’s eligibility. He defended Lt. Col Terrence Lakin’s demand that President Obama prove his eligibility as commander in chief as a condition of obeying deployment orders. Moore said he had seen no convincing evidence that Obama is a natural-born citizen and much evidence that suggests he is not. Moore said Lakin “not only has a right to follow his personal convictions under the Constitution, he has a duty.” “And if the authority running the efforts of the war is not a citizen in violation of the Constitution, the order is unlawful,” he said.

More silliness. Pray, how would the Alabama Supreme Court have jurisdiction? If the Chief Justice has gone 'on the record' about the President's eligibility, wouldn't that mean the Justice should recuse himself from hearing the case?

Anyway, silliness. This case, like all others, shall melt away in the sunlight of facts

[Old Army Soldier]

Originally Posted by legalsea

If the Chief Justice has gone 'on the record' about the President's eligibility, wouldn't that mean the Justice should recuse himself from hearing the case?

Not at all.

[Nonarchist]

Originally Posted by Arus

And like with every birther case, it will be dismissed as moot, since the election already happened, votes counted, electoral college voted, and congress affirmed.

You folks are now 3 months too late.

The horse is already out of the barn?

The system works best when it works to support fraud?

That might be the American way, but it's not the lawful way.

[Nonarchist]

Originally Posted by legalsea

More silliness. Pray, how would the Alabama Supreme Court have jurisdiction? If the Chief Justice has gone 'on the record' about the President's eligibility, wouldn't that mean the Justice should recuse himself from hearing the case?

In ceremonies of the fraudsmen, even a judge must hold a grudge.