When trying to pass Obamacare in 2009 and 2010, President Obama swore up and down the "penalty" for not signing up, wasn't a tax. Many Democrats told him it would never be passed, if there were any such taxes in it. So Obama told them it was only a penalty. It wasn't a tax. They passed it.
Then when it came up before the Supreme Court, the Justices pointed out that a penalty, as it was described in the text of the law itself, could not possibly pass constitutional muster. So Obama's lawyers simply changed their story: Since the votes had already been tallied, now it was a tax, not a penalty. On that basis, the Supreme Court OK'ed it, since it was (now) a tax.
Today, as people are starting to realize they had been lied to, and that Obamacare was in fact one of the largest tax increases in country had ever seen, Obama's spokesmen are changing their story yet again: Now it's a penalty again, not a tax. It's a penalty. A Penalty. Not a tax. For today, anyway. Got it?
Democrats are apparently confident that the American people are too stupid to notice them constantly changing their story, to whatever is convenient for the moment.
As a famous former dictator once said, "The truth? Truth is whatever serves the Soviet Union!"
On Nov. 5th, will Americans remember that it's only constitutional if it's a tax?
A BIG tax?
Or will they justify the Democrats' opinion of them as a bunch of stupid bumpkins?
---------------------------------------
White House claims ObamaCare fine a 'penalty,' despite court calling it a 'tax' | Fox News
White House claims ObamaCare fine a 'penalty,' despite court calling it a 'tax'
Published June 29, 2012
FoxNews.com
First it was a penalty. Then it was a tax. Now it's a penalty again.
The war of words over what to call the fine attached to the federal health care overhaul's most controversial provision continued Friday, as the White House took issue with the Supreme Court's argument -- even though that argument alone spared President Obama's law.