If a white person was turned away from a "black" bar the real question is.. (Mexican, drugs)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I was in an unfamiliar town looking for a hair cut. I walked in and there was a black woman doin a black womans hair. A funny look ensued. We both understood eachother and I walked out. NO Friggin BIg.
In the St. Louis area, you get shot in East St. Louis for being white. I think the same goes for certain barrios where if you are black or white, you can get shot. People are stupid that way.
I know this is common rhetoric to say " you'll get shot in that hood if you walk through it"
Can you point to more than 3 examples of this in the last year of a white person being shot in E. ST L just for bing there.......not for buying/selling dope or some other illicit thing?
How about if there was 1 specific channel called WET (white entertainment television). We have BET and I dont see any whites making a big fuss about it. Would blacks be ok about WET without causing an uproar?
How about if there was 1 specific channel called WET (white entertainment television). We have BET and I dont see any whites making a big fuss about it. Would blacks be ok about WET without causing an uproar?
There are 100's of those. The most popular are called ABC, CBS, NBC and FOX.
why would it be a media non-event and not even reported? Is it because whites are less likely to have a victim mentality and greater understanding/appreciation of private establishment rights and recognition, or is it because even if said event was reported to media outlets it would be deemed a non -event, non-shock value story by publishers/editors?
What year is it????
1940?
Did I just teleport back in time?
This thread makes zero sense to me.
Quote:
Is it because whites are less likely to have a victim mentality and greater understanding/appreciation of private establishment rights and recognition
IT IS ILLEGAL TO NOT ALLOW SOMEONE OF A PARTICULAR ETHNIC GROUP IN YOUR ESTABLISHMENT ON THE GROUNDS YOU HAVE DESCRIBED.
ILLEGAL!
Quote:
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 explicitly prohibits restaurants from refusing service to patrons on the basis of race, color, religion, or natural origin. In addition, most courts don’t allow restaurants to refuse service to patrons based on extremely arbitrary conditions. For example, a person likely can’t be refused service due to having a lazy eye.
why would it be a media non-event and not even reported? Is it because whites are less likely to have a victim mentality and greater understanding/appreciation of private establishment rights and recognition, or is it because even if said event was reported to media outlets it would be deemed a non -event, non-shock value story by publishers/editors?
They aren't less likely. Their victim mentality is just as bad as everyone else's at this point.
And if this really doesn't happen (and we both know that it doesn't) what's the point?
Lets get a dose of reality here. Do you stroll into a hardcore biker bar unless your Pee Wee Herman? Do you go check out a skinhead bar just for kicks if you don't know anybody? Do you go to a redneck bar if your black or a gangbanger club if your white? Of course not. In the liberal utipia you do but not in the real world.
There are 100's of those. The most popular are called ABC, CBS, NBC and FOX.
Last I checked, all of those networks feature black people and do not exclusively show white only shows.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.