Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-23-2011, 07:56 AM
 
15,706 posts, read 11,789,434 times
Reputation: 7020

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by miticoman View Post
any human being needs somebody ........to love.....and to be loved
If only more people believed that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-23-2011, 08:04 AM
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
2,705 posts, read 3,123,819 times
Reputation: 865
Is it the prositute or the disabled person receiving the subsidy?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2011, 08:06 AM
 
4,428 posts, read 4,487,092 times
Reputation: 1356
Legalizing prostitution is the wrong answer. You can find a ***** in almost any city in America for much less than what the government would dole out.

Whores aside. Obamacare mandates lactation rooms in the workplace .... it does .... companies have to retrofit their plants and offices to let women fill bottles with milk from their boobs.

Shouldn't Kathleen Sebelius be pushing special rooms where the disabled can roll into, on company time, and beat off? In order to enhance America's standard of living?

Unless it is financially unsustainable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2011, 08:21 AM
 
Location: No Mask For Me This Time, Either
5,663 posts, read 5,095,636 times
Reputation: 6090
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yooperkat View Post
Legalizing prostitution is the wrong answer. You can find a ***** in almost any city in America for much less than what the government would dole out.

Whores aside. Obamacare mandates lactation rooms in the workplace .... it does .... companies have to retrofit their plants and offices to let women fill bottles with milk from their boobs.
Legalizing prostitution is a good idea. Decriminalize it and put the pimps and human traffickers out of business, add oversight on health conditions to the process, increase the quality by opening the competition, and tax it! Inner city girls will have another legitimate option that many, if not most, now pursue as amateurs. The liberal schools can begin to offer degrees in it and trade schools will open nationwide. Visa workers can be brought in to service areas where American girls won't work.

Lacactation rooms are another issue totally unrelated. Where should working mothers go to pump when necessary? My wife had the option to stay at home and handle it there. A co-worker had to use the bathroom to do it, and it was uncomfortable and unnecessarily degrading. You've never been a parent, eh?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2011, 08:44 PM
 
10,449 posts, read 12,473,281 times
Reputation: 12597
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yooperkat View Post
Legalizing prostitution is the wrong answer. You can find a ***** in almost any city in America for much less than what the government would dole out.

Whores aside. Obamacare mandates lactation rooms in the workplace .... it does .... companies have to retrofit their plants and offices to let women fill bottles with milk from their boobs.

Shouldn't Kathleen Sebelius be pushing special rooms where the disabled can roll into, on company time, and beat off? In order to enhance America's standard of living?

Unless it is financially unsustainable.
This whole post makes no sense to me. Can you clarify your train of thought? Thanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2011, 08:47 PM
 
10,449 posts, read 12,473,281 times
Reputation: 12597
Quote:
Originally Posted by Workin_Hard View Post
Legalizing prostitution is a good idea. Decriminalize it and put the pimps and human traffickers out of business, add oversight on health conditions to the process, increase the quality by opening the competition, and tax it! Inner city girls will have another legitimate option that many, if not most, now pursue as amateurs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2011, 08:48 PM
 
10,449 posts, read 12,473,281 times
Reputation: 12597
Quote:
Originally Posted by Theophane View Post
Is it the prositute or the disabled person receiving the subsidy?
Where does it say anyone is receiving any subsidies?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2011, 09:31 PM
 
Location: Sinking in the Great Salt Lake
13,138 posts, read 22,837,946 times
Reputation: 14116
Quote:
Originally Posted by Theophane View Post
"Handicapped people need sex too" -- is not a flawed argument.
How about losers, ugly people, or priests, or child molesters in prison? They need sex too, so maybe we should give it to them.

Holy nanny-state batman! It's a pathetic state for civilization when the Man needs to get involved to make sure everyone gets laid!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2011, 09:55 PM
 
Location: Murika
2,526 posts, read 3,007,600 times
Reputation: 1929
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chango View Post
How about losers, ugly people, or priests, or child molesters in prison? They need sex too, so maybe we should give it to them.

Holy nanny-state batman! It's a pathetic state for civilization when the Man needs to get involved to make sure everyone gets laid!
Your post makes absolutely no sense!

Incidentally, it is the state that gets involved NOW to prevent some "losers, ugly people, or priests, or child molesters" from getting laid by making prostitution illegal. I have no idea what legalizing prostitution has to do with a "nanny state." Legalizing prostitution would place the responsibility with the consumer and provider - not with the state. Wouldn't your statement make more sense if the problem was that prostitution is legal but society would want to put a stop to that? In that case, the "nanny state" would pretend to have moral authority over people's sex life at least, when they want or need to pay for it.

Perhaps you can enlighten me?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2011, 04:58 AM
 
10,449 posts, read 12,473,281 times
Reputation: 12597
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chango View Post
How about losers, ugly people, or priests, or child molesters in prison? They need sex too, so maybe we should give it to them.

Holy nanny-state batman! It's a pathetic state for civilization when the Man needs to get involved to make sure everyone gets laid!
Wow, really? You just compared being disabled to being a loser, ugly, a priest, or a child molester?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top