Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-01-2011, 10:15 AM
 
Location: One of the 13 original colonies.
10,190 posts, read 7,958,896 times
Reputation: 8114

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkatt View Post
If the confederates waged a war of treason and aggression, please tell me why these wars were fought on soil belonging to the south?

Aggression - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

So if the South were simply DEFENDING their territory, wouldn't that make the NORTH the aggressors?

Even your own post notes that the NORTH invaded the South, so how could the SOUTH be the aggressors?

Did you realize that Virginia, when they became a part of the union, the United States of America, did so with the provision that they could secede, 1 of 3 states that did so?

I think you need more study, and comprehension.
I agree!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-01-2011, 10:15 AM
 
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
17,531 posts, read 24,706,964 times
Reputation: 9980
Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasReb View Post
*Grins* One can always count on good ol' "Boompa" to trot out that old tired and disproven canard about treason and "taking up arms" agains the United States, and such.

Which is not big deal, really. He simply doesn't believe, it appears, in the basic principle the American Revolution was fought over. That is: Government derives its powers from the consent of the governed. And, also, that a Union is no longer a union in the proper sense if it must be held together by armed force.
Ah the litany of excuses for slavery and why I don't have to be a good American. We still are paying the price for not haveing dealt with the traitors then. I see little difference between a traitor then and the one just killed by a predator drone

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2011, 10:19 AM
 
Location: One of the 13 original colonies.
10,190 posts, read 7,958,896 times
Reputation: 8114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boompa View Post
Ah the litany of excuses for slavery and why I don't have to be a good American. We still are paying the price for not haveing dealt with the traitors then.

Please explain this nonsense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2011, 10:41 AM
 
10,239 posts, read 19,616,607 times
Reputation: 5943
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestCobb View Post
I doubt you have read more on the topic than I have.
I didn't say I have. But which of us has read more books in terms of sheer volumes makes no difference unless we can both back up our cases. And? History is not an objective subject. Reasonable people can interpet the same concrete facts and come to different conclusions.

Quote:
Confederates were traitors to the United States who waged a war of treason and aggression. Their actions are nothing to be proud of.
First of all, let me kill that sacred goose of northern apologists. The "United States" as we think of it today, did not exist in 1861. In fact, it was referred to, in those days, as "these united states", reflecting the fact that each had been recognized beforehand, by the Treaty of Paris, as individual entities. Soveriegn states.

The Southern states, in seceding, did nothing much different than what the British colonies (which later became the 13 original states) had done. That is, declared their independence.

In doing so, the South only wanted seperation from the northern states, not from the principles of the original union. That "United States" thing is just a red-herring. The northern states kept the name only by default.

No treason was commited (and northern leaders admitted such) and there was no agression to it. The South had no plans to invade the north, overthrow the government they remained part of, nor do anything but go their own way in peace. In fact, they offered to negotiate a mutually beneficial economic and defense alliance and open up the Mississippi River for free trade and navigation. No aggresion at all. The South only defended itself when attacked.

Quote:
By the way, my great great grandfather wore the gray and fought for North Carolina. I'm not ashamed of him. He did what he thought had to be done to protect his home from northern invaders. However, he was wrong. Those of you who cling to the Confederate flag are like people who love the smell of their own farts.
I am a member of the Sons of Confederate Veterans. We are an historical and geneological group and have members from all walks of life and races and religions. Thus, I honor your great-great-grandfathers service.

But something to keep in mind? You say you are not ashamed of your g-g-grandfather, but use such high school type language as fart smelling to refer to those who take pride in their Southern heritage?

Well, ok, if that is the way you feel about it. Consider though that your grandfather is not alive to speak up for himself as to why he did what he did. It is easy for you to say he was "wrong". It is not possible for him to say why he didnt think he was.

Bottom line: Would he be proud of you, if he were alive today?

I hope the day will never come that my grandsons will be ashamed to own that I was a Confederate Soldier. -Pvt. A. Y. Handy, 32nd Texas Cavalry, C.S.A.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2011, 10:52 AM
 
10,239 posts, read 19,616,607 times
Reputation: 5943
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scotty011 View Post
Please explain this nonsense.
LOL Hell, Scotty, he can't and he won't. Instead, he spouts the same rote stuff about "treason" and the same nonesense he just did.

I don't really even bother replying to him, personally, anymore, I mean, I have some friends on line who take a STRONG pro-North position. I don't agree with them, and it leads to some heated arguments. But in the end, I can very much respect that they at least back up what they say with facts as they see them.

But with "Boom-pa"? It is never anything but a broken record. Whether he does it out of a sense of just being contrary, or simple historical single-mindedness? I don't know or care. But that is what it is. Heck, go back on look at the totality of his posts on the subject over the years. It comes down to a parrot squawking" Treason, treason..." and etc.

He can't explain the nonesense for the simple reason it IS nonsense! So? Don't bother with the guy, is my well-intended advise, based on past experience. If one is going to discuss/debate the issue, then save it for those who at least put some thought and real facts into their opposing viewpoints!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2011, 10:55 AM
 
Location: One of the 13 original colonies.
10,190 posts, read 7,958,896 times
Reputation: 8114
Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasReb View Post
I didn't say I have. But which of us has read more books in terms of sheer volumes makes no difference unless we can both back up our cases. And? History is not an objective subject. Reasonable people can interpet the same concrete facts and come to different conclusions.



First of all, let me kill that sacred goose of northern apologists. The "United States" as we think of it today, did not exist in 1861. In fact, it was referred to, in those days, as "these united states", reflecting the fact that each had been recognized beforehand, by the Treaty of Paris, as individual entities. Soveriegn states.

The Southern states, in seceding, did nothing much different than what the British colonies (which later became the 13 original states) had done. That is, declared their independence.

In doing so, the South only wanted seperation from the northern states, not from the principles of the original union. That "United States" thing is just a red-herring. The northern states kept the name only by default.

No treason was commited (and northern leaders admitted such) and there was no agression to it. The South had no plans to invade the north, overthrow the government they remained part of, nor do anything but go their own way in peace. In fact, they offered to negotiate a mutually beneficial economic and defense alliance and open up the Mississippi River for free trade and navigation. No aggresion at all. The South only defended itself when attacked.



I am a member of the Sons of Confederate Veterans. We are an historical and geneological group and have members from all walks of life and races and religions. Thus, I honor your great-great-grandfathers service.

But something to keep in mind? You say you are not ashamed of your g-g-grandfather, but use such high school type language as fart smelling to refer to those who take pride in their Southern heritage?

Well, ok, if that is the way you feel about it. Consider though that your grandfather is not alive to speak up for himself as to why he did what he did. It is easy for you to say he was "wrong". It is not possible for him to say why he didnt think he was.

Bottom line: Would he be proud of you, if he were alive today?

I hope the day will never come that my grandsons will be ashamed to own that I was a Confederate Soldier. -Pvt. A. Y. Handy, 32nd Texas Cavalry, C.S.A.

Very good post, but I doubt it will get through to the ignorant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2011, 12:52 PM
 
Location: Way,Way Up On The Old East Coast
2,196 posts, read 1,995,350 times
Reputation: 1089
Default " Counted 14 C.S.A. Flags Ah Flyin Way, Way Up Here Today" ... While Out Ah Puttin On Me Bike !

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkatt View Post
If the confederates waged a war of treason and aggression, please tell me why these wars were fought on soil belonging to the south?

Aggression - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

So if the South were simply DEFENDING their territory, wouldn't that make the NORTH the aggressors?

Even your own post notes that the NORTH invaded the South, so how could the SOUTH be the aggressors?

Did you realize that Virginia, when they became a part of the union, the United States of America, did so with the provision that they could secede, 1 of 3 states that did so?

I think you need more study, and comprehension.
Darkatt !!! ... Precisely !

Indeed ... It be called the "War Of Northern Aggression" by the good folks" Way, Way Up Here On The Old East Coast" !

Yep ! ... The "Yankees" sho did invade the C.S.A.... Case Closed !

Y'all Has Ah Real Nice Day Now ... Ya Hear !!! Old Sgt. Lamar

P.S. ... Be Proud To Fly The Beautiful Flag Of The C.S.A. along with the Grand American Flag !!! Two Great Flags Indeed !
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2011, 03:59 PM
 
Location: Old Mother Idaho
29,219 posts, read 22,380,933 times
Reputation: 23859
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
So what? The whiners can fly flags of their own choosing.
So why are you calling Annie Cadell a whiner?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2011, 04:36 PM
 
Location: Old Mother Idaho
29,219 posts, read 22,380,933 times
Reputation: 23859
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhawkins74 View Post
I think its really silly for people to think the way you do. But I guess in some ways you are right, it is our disdain for Democrats that made us decide to fly the confederate flag. and of course we are not from the south
It is possible that some of your Illinois Republican neighbors may have taken offense. A lot of their ancestors died in that war, fighting the side that flew that flag.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2011, 07:29 PM
 
Location: University City, Philadelphia
22,632 posts, read 14,950,377 times
Reputation: 15935
I am a northerner (born in NY, lives in PA) but I was never offended or put out by the flag of the Confederate States ... someone earlier pointed out the popular one is the battle ensign used by Gen. P. G. T. Beauregard - commonly called "The Southern Cross" (you know, the red one with the blue and white St. Andrew's cross with the stars on it) and not the more official flags such as "The Stars And Bars" and the "The Stainless Banner."

Years ago I was a little surprised to see the popularity of Confederate flags here in PA and other northern states with bikers and others who see it as a symbol that is in opposition to the US federal government. Although I do not share those views, it is fine with me if they want to fly it. In fact, last month I was taking a drive to Cape May, New Jersey and there were some bikers with Confederate flags on their bikes. I suppose African-Americans can view it as a racist thing, but I do not subscribe to that theory; it's not like a Neo-Nazi using the Swastika ... not the same thing at all, I believe.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top