Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: This poll is to demonstate on disconnected from reality republicans are
Unions 2 6.45%
Planned Parenthood 0 0%
NPR 1 3.23%
Acorn 0 0%
Social Security which solvent until 2037 2 6.45%
The wars in the middle east and Tax cuts for the rich 26 83.87%
Voters: 31. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-05-2011, 08:58 AM
 
29,920 posts, read 39,583,854 times
Reputation: 4799

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Majin View Post
Question
None of the above.

We start programs when the going is good and then when the going is bad we hit ourselves on the forehead and ask how we got into this mess.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-05-2011, 03:12 PM
 
2,963 posts, read 6,288,923 times
Reputation: 1578
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJon3475 View Post
None of the above.

We start programs when the going is good and then when the going is bad we hit ourselves on the forehead and ask how we got into this mess.
Which programs were started that caused the huge deficit and debt?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2011, 03:16 PM
 
13,016 posts, read 19,011,499 times
Reputation: 9268
Nobody mentioned the "temporary" Bush tax cuts? Didn't old Milt Friedman say nothing is as permanent as a temporary government program? How true!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2011, 03:23 PM
 
Location: Sarasota FL
6,864 posts, read 12,146,911 times
Reputation: 6747
poll is missing - spending $1.6 trillion a year for 3 years more than what is collected from tax payers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2011, 04:12 PM
 
Location: OCEAN BREEZES AND VIEWS SAN CLEMENTE
19,893 posts, read 18,507,592 times
Reputation: 6465
Quote:
Originally Posted by VTHokieFan View Post
We have a huge debt because we issued a bunch of treasury notes, bonds and bills in order to finance the amount of federal expenditures over tax revenues in a given year. That's why.


Oh i so agree with you, everything you say makes so much sense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2011, 04:25 PM
 
2,973 posts, read 1,996,458 times
Reputation: 3337
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
How about we spend more than we take in.
...bingo...we have a winner!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2011, 04:45 PM
 
Location: The D-M-V area
13,691 posts, read 18,543,186 times
Reputation: 9596
Spending!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2011, 04:46 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,302 posts, read 20,842,042 times
Reputation: 9345
None of the above. It's simple. Big government getting bigger every year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2011, 07:51 PM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 14,011,967 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by d4g4m View Post
poll is missing - spending $1.6 trillion a year for 3 years more than what is collected from tax payers.
If you look at the chart on page 2 (repeated below) the Tarp and stimulus have nearly a negligible effect on long-term debt while the Bush era tax cuts are the single biggest item.


Last edited by MTAtech; 06-05-2011 at 08:01 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2011, 08:00 PM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 14,011,967 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadking2003 View Post
None of the above. It's simple. Big government getting bigger every year.
I hear that meme all the time -- claims that there had been a huge expansion in government under Obama; Note that about half the rise in the ratio of spending to GDP reflected low GDP, not high spending, and that the other half was basically safety net programs:



Let's look at longer term cost:



Social Security is up as is Medicare but has nothing to do with Obama, who hasn't increased either program at all; it's just demography, the baby boomers retiring. Obamo didn't create the baby boom.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top