Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-24-2010, 08:03 AM
 
Location: Jonquil City (aka Smyrna) Georgia- by Atlanta
16,259 posts, read 24,784,250 times
Reputation: 3587

Advertisements

It looks like finally the government is doing what it should do and protecting the American public against the FAILURE of the PRIVATE sector! This is exactly the proper role of government- to regulate the private sector to protect the public from excessive profiteering.

FCC pushes Cablevision, Fox to settle - Entertainment News, Top News, Media - Variety
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-24-2010, 08:13 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,174,590 times
Reputation: 9383
And people wonder why Obama gets called fascists.. Now government is demanding two private enterprises to take action.

Tell me KevK.. where is it written that the proper role of government is to insure people have tv channels?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2010, 08:17 AM
 
Location: Dallas
31,292 posts, read 20,767,093 times
Reputation: 9330
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevK View Post
It looks like finally the government is doing what it should do and protecting the American public against the FAILURE of the PRIVATE sector! This is exactly the proper role of government- to regulate the private sector to protect the public from excessive profiteering.

There is nothing wrong with "excessive profiteering". If profits are made legally by a company not subsidized by government, we should applaud their success.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2010, 08:20 AM
 
2,564 posts, read 1,598,458 times
Reputation: 347
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
And people wonder why Obama gets called fascists.. Now government is demanding two private enterprises to take action.

Tell me KevK.. where is it written that the proper role of government is to insure people have tv channels?
We are a country of rule by Constitutional LAWS, not by men. From the OP's article:


'...William Lake, chief of the FCC's media bureau, sent a letter Friday to Cablevision prexy and CEO James Dolan and News Corp. chief operating officer Chase Carey asking them to justify by Monday the moves that each side has made in the long-running retrans wrangle. Lake's letter asks the toppers to explain how the sides have been negotiating in "good faith," as called for in the law governing retransmission consent deals between subscription TV providers and broadcasters. Lake's letter follows a statement from FCC Julius Genachowski earlier this week that criticized both companies for "spending more time attacking each other through ads and lobbyists" than negotiating. Cablevision and Fox execs have not held face-to-face negotiations since Monday, though the sides have had brief telephone conversations...'


Read more: FCC pushes Cablevision, Fox to settle - Entertainment News, Top News, Media - Variety
Visit Variety.com to become a Variety subscriber.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2010, 08:23 AM
 
45,250 posts, read 26,493,925 times
Reputation: 25006
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevK View Post
It looks like finally the government is doing what it should do and protecting the American public against the FAILURE of the PRIVATE sector! This is exactly the proper role of government- to regulate the private sector to protect the public from excessive profiteering.

FCC pushes Cablevision, Fox to settle - Entertainment News, Top News, Media - Variety
Liberal definition of "excessive profiteering"-Any $ amount over break even.

Liberal definition of a successful business model-Running in the red so as to require a big daddy government bailout.

Just like their own constituency, Dems like to keep business down and keep em needy.

Last edited by Frank DeForrest; 10-24-2010 at 08:33 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2010, 08:28 AM
 
Location: AZ
2,096 posts, read 3,813,230 times
Reputation: 3749
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevK View Post
This is exactly the proper role of government- to regulate the private sector to protect the public from excessive profiteering.


You wonder why people think Obama is ANTI-BUSINESS !
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2010, 08:29 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,174,590 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by aspiesmom View Post
We are a country of rule by Constitutional LAWS, not by men. From the OP's article:


'...William Lake, chief of the FCC's media bureau, sent a letter Friday to Cablevision prexy and CEO James Dolan and News Corp. chief operating officer Chase Carey asking them to justify by Monday the moves that each side has made in the long-running retrans wrangle. Lake's letter asks the toppers to explain how the sides have been negotiating in "good faith," as called for in the law governing retransmission consent deals between subscription TV providers and broadcasters. Lake's letter follows a statement from FCC Julius Genachowski earlier this week that criticized both companies for "spending more time attacking each other through ads and lobbyists" than negotiating. Cablevision and Fox execs have not held face-to-face negotiations since Monday, though the sides have had brief telephone conversations...'


Read more: FCC pushes Cablevision, Fox to settle - Entertainment News, Top News, Media - Variety
Visit Variety.com to become a Variety subscriber.
Yes we are a rule of law so why dont you respond to my question.. The job of the FCC is to make sure people dont infringe upon rights purchased and to make sure tv channels dont break the laws..

Now tell me where its written that the FCC or government has the authority to demand two people settle a private business dispute and to guarantee people have TV? Dont avoid the question.. The law says they must negotiate in good faith, thats the law for EVERYONE... It does not require government to step in, its up to the opposing party to file a complaint FIRST that the opposing party isnt negotiating in good faith.. Its not the job of the government to assume guilt without any complaint.. Has a complaint been filed by either party?

In addition the OP is just being ridiculous. Neither party is making ANY "profit" in this situation. The shows arent being broadcasted..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2010, 08:32 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,301,225 times
Reputation: 3826
TV is a right, dammit. Well, it would be called a right if FDR was alive today.

I want my MTV!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2010, 08:41 AM
 
2,564 posts, read 1,598,458 times
Reputation: 347
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Yes we are a rule of law so why dont you respond to my question.. The job of the FCC is to make sure people dont infringe upon rights purchased and to make sure tv channels dont break the laws..

Now tell me where its written that the FCC or government has the authority to demand two people settle a private business dispute and to guarantee people have TV? Dont avoid the question.. The law says they must negotiate in good faith, thats the law for EVERYONE... It does not require government to step in, its up to the opposing party to file a complaint FIRST that the opposing party isnt negotiating in good faith.. Its not the job of the government to assume guilt without any complaint.. Has a complaint been filed by either party?

In addition the OP is just being ridiculous. Neither party is making ANY "profit" in this situation. The shows arent being broadcasted..
If you are not satisfied that the law is being followed by the FCC, then it is incumbent upon you to produce that part of the law not being followed. State and prove your own case against the FCC, don't ask other CD members to do all that legwork for you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2010, 08:44 AM
 
Location: Va. Beach
6,391 posts, read 5,173,113 times
Reputation: 2283
Default r u serious?

Quote:
Originally Posted by KevK View Post
It looks like finally the government is doing what it should do and protecting the American public against the FAILURE of the PRIVATE sector! This is exactly the proper role of government- to regulate the private sector to protect the public from excessive profiteering.

FCC pushes Cablevision, Fox to settle - Entertainment News, Top News, Media - Variety
Where in G_d's name in the constitution do you see where the federal government has any right or responsibility to regulate the private sector?

Excessive profiteering?? Where do you think this money goes to? Taxes, health insurance, research and development, expansion, upgrades, pay raises, etc etc.

If a private sector corp fails, let it!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top