Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Would you like to see same-sex marriage become legal where you live?
It is already legal where I live 18 6.02%
Yes 184 61.54%
No 92 30.77%
Not sure 5 1.67%
Voters: 299. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-28-2010, 01:23 PM
 
Location: The State Of California
10,400 posts, read 15,586,421 times
Reputation: 4283

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by MsMcQ LV View Post
Wow! A whole 58, huh? Well guess what? This 60 year old makes sure she knows what she's referring to BEFORE she posts something. Since we're already on the computer, it's really not that hard to find the proper info.
My hat is off to you now go and pat yourself on the back Old Infallible
Woman.......Any time that I make a Mistake I Will Admit It...and Live
On knowing that I will make another mistake.....Smile....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-28-2010, 01:27 PM
 
Location: The State Of California
10,400 posts, read 15,586,421 times
Reputation: 4283
Quote:
Originally Posted by Voyageur View Post
You apparently can't count too well - I listed two examples.

But I'm not surprised that you were unable to reply without more obfuscation.

I MADE (2) Mistakes.."maybe" I'm Not Finished Researching "YET"
,but how many THINGS DID I SAY THAT WERE CORRECT
LET ME SEE PROBABLY MORE THAN (2)...Hum Um....Hold On To
Yours Seats.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2010, 01:49 PM
 
Location: The State Of California
10,400 posts, read 15,586,421 times
Reputation: 4283
Quote:
Originally Posted by Voyageur View Post
No, you won't.

I pointed out where you made false statements, including relevant links. You admitted nothing, and gutlessly dodged the issue, whining that you had bigger fish to fry.

You claimed "all men are created equal" is from the Constitution, but it is actually from the Declaration of Independence:
United States Declaration of Independence - Wikisource

You claimed that the Ten Commandments appears on the United States Supreme Court building, but the link that you posted yourself refutes this:
snopes.com: Religious Symbols in the U.S. National Capital
[scroll down do the letter hyperlink just below the second image to see a letter written by the architect who designed the building who clearly states that the tablet with I-X on it represents the Bill of Rights, not the Ten Commandments]

So, 'big enough man', time for an admission of ignorance from you.

Well?
I turned this thing over in my head and A LIGHT CAME ON.....
Why IN THE WORLD WOULD>>>>MOSES<<<<< BE HOLDING
THE BILL OF RIGHTS INSTEAD OF THE TEN COMMANDMENTS????
IS MY ADMITED ERROR WRONG?????

Ten Commandments stunner: Feds lying at Supreme Court
WEB SITE
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2010, 01:59 PM
 
7,541 posts, read 6,272,509 times
Reputation: 1837
Word Nut Daily isn't a credible source. Try harder.

World Nut Daily is an example of what NOT to do in journalism.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2010, 02:39 PM
 
Location: Wherever I go...
396 posts, read 732,610 times
Reputation: 715
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howest2008 View Post
The fact that you're actually using WND as a source pretty much explains every other falsehood you've posted here (4 "mistakes" have been pointed out to you, not 2, btw). If this is your source of information, it's no wonder you're so ill-informed.

WND... the same site that published an article immediately after 9/11 stating that God was using Islam and the terrorists as a way of striking back at the "moral depravity" of New York and America.

Yup - that's one heck of a great source of info. Absolutely above reproach.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2010, 04:16 PM
 
Location: The State Of California
10,400 posts, read 15,586,421 times
Reputation: 4283
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wingsy View Post
The fact that you're actually using WND as a source pretty much explains every other falsehood you've posted here (4 "mistakes" have been pointed out to you, not 2, btw). If this is your source of information, it's no wonder you're so ill-informed.

WND... the same site that published an article immediately after 9/11 stating that God was using Islam and the terrorists as a way of striking back at the "moral depravity" of New York and America.

Yup - that's one heck of a great source of info. Absolutely above reproach.
Thanks Wingsy GOD wouldn't have to use Islam RADICAL ISLAM
Hates AMERICA Enuff to bomb the WORLD TRADE CENTER without
GOD having a hand in it.....


But Wingsy can you wrap your MIND around MOSES carrying around
The BILL OF RIGHTS instead of THE TEN COMMANDMENTS AT THE
SCOTUS......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2010, 07:01 PM
 
Location: Wherever I go...
396 posts, read 732,610 times
Reputation: 715
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howest2008 View Post
Thanks Wingsy GOD wouldn't have to use Islam RADICAL ISLAM
Hates AMERICA Enuff to bomb the WORLD TRADE CENTER without
GOD having a hand in it.....


But Wingsy can you wrap your MIND around MOSES carrying around
The BILL OF RIGHTS instead of THE TEN COMMANDMENTS AT THE
SCOTUS......
Can you wrap your mind around Moses carrying around tablets bearing a numeric system that was not even in use at the time the events in Exodus supposedly happened?

Personally, I find that entire line of thought irrelevant... the Supreme Court is surrounded by symbols of "law & order." So it is no more significant if the Ten Commandments are represented than the fact that Confucius is also represented, as is Hammurabi - which is interesting given how often Christians declare that marriage is a religious institution, yet the Hammurabi (which pre-dates Christianity by hundreds of years) clearly discusses marriage.

Guess who else is up there? Mohammed. So does that mean Islamic law has bearing on our judiciary?

Btw - have you finished "researching" the other false claims you made which have been disproved? Because I'm still waiting with absolutely bated breath for your acknowledgement...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2010, 11:23 AM
 
Location: The State Of California
10,400 posts, read 15,586,421 times
Reputation: 4283
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wingsy View Post
Can you wrap your mind around Moses carrying around tablets bearing a numeric system that was not even in use at the time the events in Exodus supposedly happened?

Personally, I find that entire line of thought irrelevant... the Supreme Court is surrounded by symbols of "law & order." So it is no more significant if the Ten Commandments are represented than the fact that Confucius is also represented, as is Hammurabi - which is interesting given how often Christians declare that marriage is a religious institution, yet the Hammurabi (which pre-dates Christianity by hundreds of years) clearly discusses marriage.

Guess who else is up there? Mohammed. So does that mean Islamic law has bearing on our judiciary?

Btw - have you finished "researching" the other false claims you made which have been disproved? Because I'm still waiting with absolutely bated breath for your acknowledgement...
Yeah ..but...but...but...none of the Founding Fathers Followed
""Confucius""(or) Hammurabi....and Christianity doesn't stand
ALONE IT GREW OUT OF JEWISH BELIEVES.....Refresh My Memory
ON MY FALSE STATEMENTS...will ya PLEAZE.........
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2011, 02:38 AM
 
9,326 posts, read 22,021,405 times
Reputation: 4571
Quote:
Originally Posted by US-Traveller View Post
Exactly. Gay people have a tendency to believe that they were "born that way." There is not evidence to back this up, however there is evidence to back up that there is innate sexuality that is predisposed toward heterosexuality. Judge Walker is trying to make up rights. There is no right to marriage in the Federal Constitution. States have been given the discretion to make up marriage law. Homosexuality is not a protected class, whereas race is, and they are trying to use the equal protections clause to justify the ruling, but the EPC was designed to prevent "black codes" and other discrimination against former slaves and African-Americans. It is a shame that the left-wing is trying to use our courts to advance their agenda.
You obviously are not an APA licensed psychiatrist. You don't provide academic links to the inane dribble that you spew.

On another thread you state sexuality is fluid.. So I guess your husband and children will be doing both sexes. When did your last change and did it with a woman?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2011, 06:25 AM
 
Location: The State Of California
10,400 posts, read 15,586,421 times
Reputation: 4283
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wingsy View Post
Can you wrap your mind around Moses carrying around tablets bearing a numeric system that was not even in use at the time the events in Exodus supposedly happened?

Hebrews had a numeric numbering system of one thur ten.

Personally, I find that entire line of thought irrelevant... the Supreme Court is surrounded by symbols of "law & order." So it is no more significant if the Ten Commandments are represented than the fact that Confucius

Confucius - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

is also represented, as is Hammurabi -

Code of Hammurabi - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

which is interesting given how often Christians declare that marriage is a religious institution, yet the Hammurabi (which pre-dates Christianity by hundreds of years) clearly discusses marriage.

The Hebrew model of marriage started at the beginning of time with Adam and Eve and Christian Marriage spring from Jewish Marriage.

Guess who else is up there? Mohammed. So does that mean Islamic law has bearing on our judiciary?

No.......

Btw - have you finished "researching" the other false claims you made which have been disproved? Because I'm still waiting with absolutely bated breath for your acknowledgement...
Don't know what you talking about.....



Men can't change absolute truth no matter how they try (if) any man or woman stand firm on their's beliefs so be it.....I'm O.K. with not getting my way in all matter of life , and I won't run away cryng at the up of my lungs over the outcome of Gay Marriage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top