Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You have no idea how much worse it could have been if that trillion hadn't been spent.
Good grief, when are you liberals going to see the truth? Yes, it would be worse, but it was only a delay of the inevitable. The "worse" is now coming.
I guess that means the jobs number for July will be negative, since all those temporary census workers will be gone.
Perhaps Obama should let someone hold his purse or murse while he attempts to run the country. When will he realize he can't spend his way out of this economic crisis?
Good grief, when are you liberals going to see the truth? Yes, it would be worse, but it was only a delay of the inevitable. The "worse" is now coming.
So when we're losing 750,000 jobs a month as we were during the last couple months of Bush, the government should do nothing?
I'm not an Obama fan, I don't like its economic policy, I think he's really bad because he didn't study the economy or run a business..But honestly I'm happy for these 42,000 jobs added.Yes, it's clearly not enough, much more is needed, but it's better than nothing.
For example, the economy of France continues to destroy jobs since January.
Things could be worse - we should give credit where due. Looking on the bright side, with 42K jobs/mo we will have all the 15M unemployed back to work by 2039.
For example, the economy of France continues to destroy jobs since January.
January, 1955?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.