I know i'm getting into a debate here and probably won't follow up on the replies, but here goes:
To me, the difference between a mild spanking and "hitting" as many like to call it, is control. Thinking a swat and a punch/beating are the same thing is so illogical it's really difficult to reasonably respond.
A really good talking to followed by a couple of mild swats on the fanny as an attention getter is not abusive, it doesn't teach them that they can hit to resolve issues (unless you're excessive and quick-triggered about it), and it doesn't create deviants.....it only teaches them that if they act up enough and ignore the other warnings that should usually come first (time out, etc), that this slightly embarassing last resort is always out there as an option.
I didn't get spanked much as a kid...had to do something either dangerous to my safety or others...or work toward it over a series of days and ignore various other less invasive discipline checkpoints. But, when that rare occasion occurred, it always really got my attention...and it wasn't the sting (which was never a big deal at all)....it was just the whole experience of being "taken down a slight notch or two" in the ego department. I noticed more blushing than stinging...and always got a hug afterward for goodness sake
![Embarrassment](https://pics3.city-data.com/forum/images/smilies/redface.gif)
...never once felt "abused".
I got more "paddlings" at school over the years than I got at home and no harm was done there either...although, as an adult i'll have to admit that this day in age, i'd prefer a note from the teacher and let the parents make that call. Regardless of a teacher's efforts, unless the parents are involved...that's really useless in the greater scheme of things. My folks rarely found out about these little events and that wasn't right. Also, who can really be trusted that much these days?...for us, it's nobody but us...and a few very immediate family members who share babysitting duties.
I think things would be alot different today with kids if we hadn't gotten so extreme in our ideals over the last 20 years or so as to think that all physical discipline is abusive. Time out and such just doesn't always work...depends on the kid...and only the individual parent knows. There are few "always" or "never"s.
I know they'll be alot of you who disagree and that's o.k if something else is working well with your kids...that's great!...it certainly shouldn't be a quick triggered response...but when nothing else is getting through and you know that you are capable of doing it the correct way...it isn't necessarily abusive and it doesn't have to imply that "hitting" is o.k.
Those general arguments are stale and worn out frankly....just look at what's going on in the world with our kids...why have things changed so much for the worse since we all began taking discipline out of the equation and started "reasoning" with little Johnny over and over and over with no reinforcement?...think about it. That experiment has had about a 2-decade trial and has failed miserably in more cases than not. We have to wake up and stop being so "black & white" with regard to forms of discipline or things are going to get even worse...may be too late already to reverse the bad impact...but, I hope not.
Thanks for reading.