Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Oregon
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-09-2016, 12:29 PM
 
9,444 posts, read 6,622,701 times
Reputation: 18903

Advertisements

King City, by Tigard, has a 55+ community with houses under 300K, a golf course, indoor and outdoor swimming pools, clubhouse, meeting rooms, clubs and activities. There are many former Californians and others there as well as Oregonians. It is not new, but nice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-09-2016, 09:58 PM
 
Location: Tri-State area near the colorado river
285 posts, read 380,234 times
Reputation: 111
Quote:
Originally Posted by PNW-type-gal View Post
That may be your interpretation, but it is absolutely not correct - the point of the Urban Growth Boundaries was to protect prime farmland from being plowed under for subdivisions and keep the Willamette Valley from being one huge urban housing development. The boundaries require a city to have a certain percentage of available land and to plan future expansions, rather than just putting all land up for sale to the developer willing to pay the most.

It means we don't have the massive developments that feature hundreds on hundreds of houses sprawling across the hills (the good) but it also keeps land values relatively high (the bad).

Southern Oregon has the same Urban Growth Boundaries as the rest of the state, which, again, have nothing to do with outsiders and much more to do with protecting farm land.
To get that Oregon GMA (Growth Management Act) passed in 1973, you'd have to get all the Southern Oregon and Eastern Oregon reps on board with enough of them voting YES. I haven't checked the numbers, but I bet a lot of them voted YES in order to protect their small towns from being "invaded" by outside business interests.

These outside businesses would compete with the Family Owned establishments, like Shari's Restaurants, or Black Bear Diner, which at one time, would have been family owned (maybe they still are, I have no idea).

If Chilis or Applebys comes in, they're going to be vastly more popular than Shari's (based in NE Oregon), or, Black Bear Diner (based in Mt. Shasta, CA). In Bullhead City, AZ, the Black Bear Diner can afford to shut down during remodelling. They're a very popular yet successful business in several states.

Imagine if they had other competitors and they might have to stay open during remodeling?

Most cities in Oregon are run by a good ol' boys network that restricts outside interests. Corvallis, for example, has a Ban on Big Box Stores, so they're over in Albany like the Kohls and Costco.

Bend, will never be another Boulder, since they are so strongly anti-growth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2016, 10:37 AM
 
Location: The beautiful Rogue Valley, Oregon
7,785 posts, read 18,893,750 times
Reputation: 10784
You are still looking at the UGB through a narrow lens and one that has a big=better bias. The point of UGB wasn't exclusion or some kind of business protectionism, it was to keep the entire Willamette Valley from being one huge subdivision of houses and big box stores. Other areas of Oregon went along with the legislation (this was never put up to a public vote, it was back when legislators knew they were elected to achieve things rather than throw anything even slightly controversial on the ballot so they could hold up their hands and say "hey, I didn't vote for this" if it proves to be unpopular).

Most Oregon cities have big boxes and chain restaurants, but where they are has been planned (lol, not always well, cf: the Hwy 62 big boxes in Medford). What most Oregon cities don't have is the huge housing developments ringing the city, expanding ever-outward. My son lives near LA in a housing development slapped together over about 8 years in the late 80s - 2,500 acres of ticky-tacky boxes, about 4,000 houses. I'd hate to see the local farm lands around the cities here go under for that or a bunch of lousy national chain restaurants.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2016, 02:02 AM
 
Location: Tri-State area near the colorado river
285 posts, read 380,234 times
Reputation: 111
Quote:
Originally Posted by PNW-type-gal View Post
You are still looking at the UGB through a narrow lens and one that has a big=better bias. The point of UGB wasn't exclusion or some kind of business protectionism, it was to keep the entire Willamette Valley from being one huge subdivision of houses and big box stores. Other areas of Oregon went along with the legislation (this was never put up to a public vote, it was back when legislators knew they were elected to achieve things rather than throw anything even slightly controversial on the ballot so they could hold up their hands and say "hey, I didn't vote for this" if it proves to be unpopular).

Most Oregon cities have big boxes and chain restaurants, but where they are has been planned (lol, not always well, cf: the Hwy 62 big boxes in Medford). What most Oregon cities don't have is the huge housing developments ringing the city, expanding ever-outward. My son lives near LA in a housing development slapped together over about 8 years in the late 80s - 2,500 acres of ticky-tacky boxes, about 4,000 houses. I'd hate to see the local farm lands around the cities here go under for that or a bunch of lousy national chain restaurants.
It was for exclusion, look how Bend, Oregon doesn't even to this day have a mall, so that local can operate their storefronts at various locations such as the Old Mill.

It's the same politics here in northern Arizona.

And also in Chico, CA.

Only Scottsdale and Portland have fully embraced the big box approach.

Hwy 62 meets the 132 foot wide standard. So it may seem loud, noisy, and poorly planned, but you don't find that sort of thing except in eastern and southern Oregon, and hwy 99W in Lane County.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2016, 07:40 AM
 
Location: North Idaho
32,765 posts, read 48,499,773 times
Reputation: 78833
Quote:
Originally Posted by theoaks View Post
It was for exclusion, look how Bend, Oregon doesn't even to this day have a mall, so that local can operate their storefronts at various locations such as the Old Mill. .........
Bend Oregon is full of shopping malls. If you mean fully enclosed malls, there were three of them and two of them have been torn down and replaced with even more stores, but open to the sky walk ways. The third one is still there.

The Old Mill District certainly meets most persons definition of a mall, but if you are only going to count fully enclosed malls, then The Old Mill District is certainly a large shopping center, full of lots of stores, restaurants, and a movie theater.

Bend has all sorts of huge national chains. No one is being excluded by the UGB.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2016, 07:46 AM
 
Location: Baker City, Oregon
5,521 posts, read 8,261,583 times
Reputation: 11870
Quote:
Originally Posted by theoaks View Post
It was for exclusion, look how Bend, Oregon doesn't even to this day have a mall, .........
During the mall building craze period in the United States Bend wasn't large enough to warrant one.

Today, malls everywhere are being closed and almost none, if any, of the size suitable for Bend are being built.

Google it, there is plenty to read.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2016, 10:42 AM
 
Location: The beautiful Rogue Valley, Oregon
7,785 posts, read 18,893,750 times
Reputation: 10784
Quote:
Originally Posted by theoaks View Post
Hwy 62 meets the 132 foot wide standard. So it may seem loud, noisy, and poorly planned, but you don't find that sort of thing except in eastern and southern Oregon, and hwy 99W in Lane County.
Hwy 62 by the big boxes and mall IS a noisy, poorly-planned, frequently grid-locked stretch. So bad, in fact, that the state/feds are building a bypass (work starts later this year) to route all non-local traffic around it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2016, 10:09 PM
 
Location: Tri-State area near the colorado river
285 posts, read 380,234 times
Reputation: 111
Quote:
Originally Posted by PNW-type-gal View Post
Hwy 62 by the big boxes and mall IS a noisy, poorly-planned, frequently grid-locked stretch. So bad, in fact, that the state/feds are building a bypass (work starts later this year) to route all non-local traffic around it.
I've only driven it about 10 times, you're more of an expert than me given your knowledge of this bypass ! That is terrific to hear that ODOT and the feds are going to smooth the traffic flow.

My comment was meant to point out that at least they have all the stores in Medford / Eagle Point that are easily accessible, yet it is very noisy, as you point out.

Bend, OR could use an Eastern Bypass, a loop freeway, to take people out of the City who otherwise clog up its downtown areas / Business-97 / who don't use the existing Hwy-97. Similar, to Medford.

Do you know if Bend has entertained that idea ???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2016, 06:21 AM
 
Location: North Idaho
32,765 posts, read 48,499,773 times
Reputation: 78833
Quote:
Originally Posted by theoaks View Post
.....Bend, OR could use an Eastern Bypass, ........Do you know if Bend has entertained that idea ???
I've not heard anything about it. If they are considering it, don't expect anything soon. They were discussing where to put the Parkway even back in early 1970's. If they want an Eastern bypass, and are discussing now, look for it about the turn of the century.

It took them 15 years to decide where to put the new overpass at the end of the parkway. Then they put in two and both of them only serve the same one direction. Winco purchased land in that location and wasn't allowed to build until the Murphy overpass route was decided on. Two possible routes, only a few feet apart and nobody could agree on which one, so nothing got done.

We are talking about the same people here who put in the Parkway with absolutely no way to get from the Parkway to Hwy 20 East.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Oregon

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top