Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-04-2013, 01:15 PM
 
1,682 posts, read 3,169,141 times
Reputation: 730

Advertisements

Moderator's Note: The following initial posts were relocated from an unrelated thread about a different accident, and refer to the incident in East Harlem. This article from the NY Times serves as a reference for this accident: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/02/ny...oy-6.html?_r=0

I don't blame the crossing guard. The chance she would be on the same side of the street when that kid was hit was unlikely. The truck was not supposed to be on that street. I also blame the city for not implementing the traffic calming that should have existed at that very intersection. The location where that child was run over would have been a pedestrian refuge. Good job NIMBYs...

If anything positive can come about these events, how about a pledge for much more aggressive traffic calming.

Last edited by bmwguydc; 03-05-2013 at 07:56 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-04-2013, 03:29 PM
 
3,244 posts, read 5,242,334 times
Reputation: 2551
Quote:
Originally Posted by nykiddo718718 View Post
I don't blame the crossing guard. The chance she would be on the same side of the street when that kid was hit was unlikely.
What? Do you anything about the process? Kids are crossing First Avenue, from the east side of the street to the west side. The guard stands on the east side, holds the children back, then proceeds into the street to ensure traffic stops, then gestures to the children to proceed, while holding up traffic, until the kids reach the far curb. Perhaps a few side-steps along with them. Reverse the process in the afternoon, when the kids are crossing in the opposite direction. It's not rocket science.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nykiddo718718 View Post
The truck was not supposed to be on that street.
I've seen this comment elsewhere, as well. However, not in any media report. Do you know where the truck was going, or coming from? If it had been making a delivery on the block where this occurred? While there are truck routes, they are permitted to divert to delivery locations.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nykiddo718718 View Post
I also blame the city for not implementing the traffic calming that should have existed at that very intersection.
Do you know the speed of the tractor-trailer, while it was turning? It could have been going less than 5 mph. There was also a helper in the passenger seat, who stated that he did not see the boy either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2013, 05:37 AM
 
1,682 posts, read 3,169,141 times
Reputation: 730
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigjake54 View Post
What? Do you anything about the process? Kids are crossing First Avenue, from the east side of the street to the west side. The guard stands on the east side, holds the children back, then proceeds into the street to ensure traffic stops, then gestures to the children to proceed, while holding up traffic, until the kids reach the far curb. Perhaps a few side-steps along with them. Reverse the process in the afternoon, when the kids are crossing in the opposite direction. It's not rocket science.

I've seen this comment elsewhere, as well. However, not in any media report. Do you know where the truck was going, or coming from? If it had been making a delivery on the block where this occurred? While there are truck routes, they are permitted to divert to delivery locations.

Do you know the speed of the tractor-trailer, while it was turning? It could have been going less than 5 mph. There was also a helper in the passenger seat, who stated that he did not see the boy either.
The crossing guard was in the wrong for being away at the time but the trucker is the one who commit the act. There is a commercial vehicle restriction on side streets near primary thoroughfares (truck routes).

Also, what's more Important... Let's get more aggressive about traffic calming in NYC.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2013, 08:48 AM
 
3,244 posts, read 5,242,334 times
Reputation: 2551
Quote:
Originally Posted by nykiddo718718 View Post
There is a commercial vehicle restriction on side streets near primary thoroughfares (truck routes).
Where was he coming from? Where was he going? While First Ave. & 116th St. are truck routes, he could use 117th if he was making a delivery on the block.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nykiddo718718 View Post
more Important... Let's get more aggressive about traffic calming in NYC.
So, if he was making the turn at, say, 4 mph, which is walking speed, you'd want him to do it at 3 mph? There's no evidence that he careened wildly around the corner, running down a child in front of him. Tractor trailers make wide turns. The child ran at the rear of the trailer. It's awful. It's tragic. But, had the crossing guard been there, doing her job, she would have been controlling the intersection, for both drivers and pedestrians.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2013, 01:00 PM
 
1,682 posts, read 3,169,141 times
Reputation: 730
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigjake54 View Post
Where was he coming from? Where was he going? While First Ave. & 116th St. are truck routes, he could use 117th if he was making a delivery on the block.

So, if he was making the turn at, say, 4 mph, which is walking speed, you'd want him to do it at 3 mph? There's no evidence that he careened wildly around the corner, running down a child in front of him. Tractor trailers make wide turns. The child ran at the rear of the trailer. It's awful. It's tragic. But, had the crossing guard been there, doing her job, she would have been controlling the intersection, for both drivers and pedestrians.
He wasn't making a delivery on that block, he was trying to get to 2n Ave. He should have been on E 116th.

My main problem with this story is the media concentration on the crossing guard. When in reality we should be focusing on traffic calming measures. There are way to minimize pedestrian deaths and the NIMBYs are killing people by opposing them. Let's make some changes instead of playing the blame game..

Also:

http://www.streetsblog.org/2013/03/0...ar-olds-fault/

Quote:
NYPD and Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance are reportedly targeting a crossing guard for her supposed role in the death of 6-year-old Amar Diarrassouba, who was killed by a truck driver in East Harlem Thursday morning. Meanwhile, a local businessman and community board member who waged a campaign against pedestrian refuges and protected bike lanes on First and Second Avenues has publicly pinned the blame on the victim’s 9-year-old brother.

Last edited by nykiddo718718; 03-06-2013 at 02:18 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2013, 04:41 PM
 
3,244 posts, read 5,242,334 times
Reputation: 2551
Quote:
Originally Posted by nykiddo718718 View Post
He wasn't making a delivery on that block, he was trying to get to 2n Ave. He should have been on E 116th.
Link?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2013, 10:08 PM
 
3,244 posts, read 5,242,334 times
Reputation: 2551
http://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/2013...il-reports-say

Family of Amar Diarrassouba sues firm whose truck struck and killed the 6-year-old in East Harlem - NY Daily News
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:



Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top