Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-16-2011, 09:24 AM
 
Location: NJ
12,283 posts, read 35,705,123 times
Reputation: 5331

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ooodsie View Post
I agree with Kevin that a lot of homes that are preforeclosure have not even gotten to the foreclosure state yet and therefore once they hit the market as bank owned, we will see even more fall out in lower prices in neighborhoods. There are a ton of short sales, but most buyers are leary of dealing with them - which makes it even worse, because ultimately those homes are in line to go back to the bank.

It's silly to try to predict a "bottom" ... you can't ever really know when the bottom is until you're already OUT of it!
so you think we'll have a "V" recovery then.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-16-2011, 09:26 AM
 
Location: NJ
12,283 posts, read 35,705,123 times
Reputation: 5331
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnesthesiaMD View Post
I think you hit the nail on the head. The OP's premise is that cutting state expenditures will cause the state workers to lose jobs, lower salaries and lower benefits, leading to a declining hosing market. I think that just the opposite is true. There are a lot more private sector workers than state workers. If we dont break the cycle of infinitely rising property taxes, these private sector workers, who are either unemployed, or taking a decreased salary are going to have even MORE trouble keeping up their payments. Now, I haven't seen property taxes stop rising yet, but logic dictates that if you cut expenditures, the taxes will eventually not have to be as high as they otherwise would have been. The Star Ledger had an article about property taxes in West Orange, where people are often paying more in property taxes than they are on their mortgage. That is just outrageous. The prices in West Orange are great, mainly because the property taxes are so punitive that nobody wants to buy the houses...even at a fair price. More measures need to be taken to decrease property taxes, not less.
Now I don't know what % of WO tax bill is what - but residents are partly to blame because they do vote on the budget, no? They need to take some responsibility for the punitive taxes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2011, 04:45 PM
 
Location: NJ/NY
18,476 posts, read 15,266,337 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by tahiti View Post
Now I don't know what % of WO tax bill is what - but residents are partly to blame because they do vote on the budget, no? They need to take some responsibility for the punitive taxes.
Perhaps, but that brings me to another observation. It seems that towns known for the highest property taxes, without schools to match are also the most economically diverse. Montclair, West Orange, South Orange, Maplewood, Englewood, etc. Is this a product of the have-nots (resource users) in town voting budgets that the "haves" (resource providers) can't necessarily afford? And what can really be done to fix it? Here in Essex County, the more homogenous west essex tends to have better schools and lower property taxes than the more economically diverse towns of the east. Personally, I would love to move to Montclair, but then my kids would have to go to private school. To pay that kind of property taxes AND private school would be crazy. The other towns I mentioned have the same problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2011, 04:58 PM
 
Location: NJ
12,283 posts, read 35,705,123 times
Reputation: 5331
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnesthesiaMD View Post
Perhaps, but that brings me to another observation. It seems that towns known for the highest property taxes, without schools to match are also the most economically diverse. Montclair, West Orange, South Orange, Maplewood, Englewood, etc. Is this a product of the have-nots (resource users) in town voting budgets that the "haves" (resource providers) can't necessarily afford? And what can really be done to fix it? Here in Essex County, the more homogenous west essex tends to have better schools and lower property taxes than the more economically diverse towns of the east. Personally, I would love to move to Montclair, but then my kids would have to go to private school. To pay that kind of property taxes AND private school would be crazy. The other towns I mentioned have the same problem.
Glen Ridge? North Caldwell?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2011, 05:00 PM
 
Location: NJ/NY
18,476 posts, read 15,266,337 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by tahiti View Post
Glen Ridge? North Caldwell?
I'll give you Glen Ridge...but they have a school system to show for it. Millburn too. But North Caldwell is low compared to all the other examples I gave.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2011, 09:06 AM
 
Location: NJ
31,771 posts, read 40,726,528 times
Reputation: 24590
i think this depression will be around for a good 10-15 years and everything will be getting worse and worse until all the sudden it will really get bad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2011, 09:31 AM
 
2,535 posts, read 6,671,133 times
Reputation: 1603
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainNJ View Post
i think this depression will be around for a good 10-15 years and everything will be getting worse and worse until all the sudden it will really get bad.
Well aren't you just a ray of sunshine on this cold Monday morning.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2011, 09:35 AM
 
133 posts, read 502,891 times
Reputation: 123
The best thing to do is stay put where you are for a VERY Very long time if you don't want to lose money!!!.(If you can). I have a house I bought 2009 and was hoping that in 10 years(This depression would be all over) from now it would appreciate a bit so we could upgrade into our "Dream House"....but I'm thinking very differently the past few months now...my house is 2000 SFT and a decent size, and not small by any means. We have no kids yet... it is 3 bed/2.5 baths...so it really is enough. This recession/depression has made me rethink things in terms of what we Really need versus Wants...I realize that staying in the same house for a long time allows you to put money away in other places...invest etc..if you keep upgrading it is harder to have any net worth in the end(unless you make a profit from each house, but now that is just a fantasy in this market)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2011, 10:19 AM
 
14,780 posts, read 43,715,753 times
Reputation: 14622
I think the decision to buy should all come down to whether or not it is the right decision for you to personally make. Also, when that time does come, stick to your budget and address your needs first and try to see if you have enough left over to get some of the wants included as well.

As for the long term market, my guess would be that real estate will perform to it's historical inflation based appreciation. So, don't bank on your homes value going through the roof and being able to flip it and move up the way people used to.

Also, while short sales and foreclosures seem to dominate the market, they seem to be having little effect on traditional sales at least in my area. The process for buying a foreclosure/short sale is daunting and people seem to be seeking out the few homes that are a regular sale without these issues and those homes are still able to get market value. In my development there is one foreclosure that has been on the market for almost a year. In that time 8 other homes have come on the market and sold within 3 months that were all traditional sales. Also, the bulk of the pain seems to be in the move up market. If you are in what could be classified as a starter home, those seem to have a pretty easy time selling.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2011, 10:29 PM
 
1,319 posts, read 4,250,991 times
Reputation: 822
Just about everything's been said about shortsale, inventory, etc. My biggest take on current RE market aside from things mentioned are three things.

1. Unemployment rate
2. Property Tax/Quality of public education
3. Transportation

Until employment situation improves, people will be hesitant about taking on one of the biggest debt of their lives (even at very low rate) to purchase a real estate.

While families or couples planning for children are more willing to pay the high property tax for quality public education. It's a turn off for people not in that category. Especially if town has crappy public education but still charge the same property tax range of 2-2.2%. At the same time, good public education is one big plus that draws people.

Transportation is big factor for North NJ, it's close to NYC and provides multiple ways into city. While having choices of towns with good public educations. It's great. Honestly though I think quality/hours of bus service and cost is getting nutty and need to be controlled. For example, in 2010 monthly bus rate went up 25% for us and services were reduced. My wife's profession requires her to work some saturdays and she can't take the bus because first bus service on weekend doesn't start until 7:30am...If there is no traffic at all, earliest she can get to port authority is 8-8:10ish. It's actually forcing us to probably move soon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top