Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Movies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-01-2019, 08:06 AM
 
16,421 posts, read 12,515,078 times
Reputation: 59649

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Delahanty View Post
Exactly. And I'm not necessarily averse to that portrayal, but the difference between clips of Andrews and those of Blunt are striking. Does EB even sing A spoonful of sugar...? I can't picture it lol.
Why would she sing "A Spoonful of Sugar"? It's not a remake.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-02-2019, 03:39 AM
 
Location: California
37,135 posts, read 42,222,200 times
Reputation: 35014
It was just OK. I watched it for Lin-Manual Miranda. All the parts where there but I'm not sure this kind of movie appeals to children today. Probably mostly people who grew up with the original, like me, will be the ones checking it out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2019, 06:16 PM
 
Location: Niflheim
1,331 posts, read 1,987,934 times
Reputation: 1133
It sucked really bad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2019, 09:11 PM
 
Location: Upstate NY 🇺🇸
36,754 posts, read 14,831,521 times
Reputation: 35584
Mary Floppins.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2019, 11:04 PM
 
11,638 posts, read 12,709,490 times
Reputation: 15782
Quote:
Originally Posted by Delahanty View Post
Mary Floppins.
Wrong. https://variety.com/2018/film/news/a...ce-1203096593/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2019, 12:49 AM
 
Location: San Francisco
2,416 posts, read 2,024,118 times
Reputation: 3999
Just having seen the trailer, it struck me that there was a slight hint of the dominatrix in Blunt's Poppins.

Last edited by modernist1; 01-06-2019 at 01:06 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2019, 10:00 PM
 
Location: Maui No Ka 'Oi
1,539 posts, read 1,560,051 times
Reputation: 2367
I LUVED IT ! The music and dance scenes were splendid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2019, 02:45 PM
 
Location: Waco, TX
349 posts, read 260,644 times
Reputation: 457
Pretty good. A bit longer than it needed to be. I can't remember a single tune. Did the original movie character admire herself as much as this version did? When this Mary Poppins relished her reflection in the balloon, that was just a little creepy for me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2019, 02:52 PM
 
5,544 posts, read 8,317,781 times
Reputation: 11141
Quote:
Originally Posted by WacoBill View Post
Pretty good. A bit longer than it needed to be. I can't remember a single tune. Did the original movie character admire herself as much as this version did? When this Mary Poppins relished her reflection in the balloon, that was just a little creepy for me.
yes, kinda.

she looked at her own reflection to ensure she was "practically perfect in every way". can't say she relished her reflection because that wouldn't be practically perfect would it?

but no, I haven't seen it. I saw the trailer at the movie and felt the Mary Poppins in this version had elocution that seemed forced. The first Mary Poppins may have had perfect diction, hat, nose, etc but it was not forced because she WAS practically perfect totally serious but an undercurrent of lightheartedness.

so I didn't want to see this version , it just seemed less.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2019, 03:11 PM
 
Location: Waco, TX
349 posts, read 260,644 times
Reputation: 457
Quote:
Originally Posted by theoldnorthstate View Post
.....The first Mary Poppins may have had perfect diction, hat, nose, etc but it was not forced because she WAS practically perfect........
Totally agree. Being of a certain age, to have seen the original, in the theatre, Julie Andrews was indeed practically perfect in each and every way for me, too.

Kinda like Sean Connery as 007. Every subsequent actor just.... doesn't.... compare.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Movies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top