Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Movies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-27-2012, 02:07 PM
 
4,183 posts, read 6,541,959 times
Reputation: 1734

Advertisements

Apocalypto was a much much better movie than HG. There's just no comparison. The action scenes were more compelling. The sequence at the ball court where Jaguar Paw and the other prisoners were made to run, only for most of them to be killed at the end of the open space by Zero Wolf's son is the type of adrenaline-pumping action that's lacking from HG. Also the subsequent chase through the jungles had that superior caliber of film-making. The cinematography was just stunningly beautiful. Not so with HG. Apoclaypto was entertaining. HG? Blah...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-27-2012, 02:10 PM
 
Location: Atlanta, GA
696 posts, read 1,306,751 times
Reputation: 597
Apocalypto is a classic. Loved it. Shame Mel Gibson turned out to be such a major prick ....he made some good movies in his lifetime!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2012, 06:12 PM
 
Location: Maine
22,995 posts, read 28,462,077 times
Reputation: 31491
Quote:
Originally Posted by ndfmnlf View Post
Exactly. For the HG ending to have been a deus ex machina, it would have had to have been an "unexpected intervention of some new event, character, ability, or object."

It wasn't any of those things. If you didn't see that ending coming, you weren't paying attention. It was motivated and set up throughout the story. In fact, nearly every scene with Mr. Weird Beard and President Kiefer's Dad were setting this up.


Quote:
Originally Posted by ndfmnlf View Post
By changing the rules arbitrarily when there is no evidence these rules have ever been changed before (they've been doing this for 74 years) to favor a District's team that has nothing special about it to deserve favorable treatment meets the definition of a contrived plot device
Again, you must have seen a different movie than I did. Throughout the story, the bad guys were changing the rules of the game, aiding certain players, encouraging dissension and alliances, throwing fireballs at players who neared the no-no zone, and loosing mutant pit bulls just to up the conflict. This entire game was about manipulation and mind games.

You can argue that the climax was sentimental and predictable. You can even argue it was meant to set up sequels. But it certainly didn't come out of nowhere. The entire plot set this up.

But I'm splitting hairs. It's just a popcorn flick after all.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2012, 08:29 PM
 
4,183 posts, read 6,541,959 times
Reputation: 1734
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark S. View Post
Exactly. For the HG ending to have been a deus ex machina, it would have had to have been an "unexpected intervention of some new event, character, ability, or object."

It wasn't any of those things. If you didn't see that ending coming, you weren't paying attention. It was motivated and set up throughout the story. In fact, nearly every scene with Mr. Weird Beard and President Kiefer's Dad were setting this up.




Again, you must have seen a different movie than I did. Throughout the story, the bad guys were changing the rules of the game, aiding certain players, encouraging dissension and alliances, throwing fireballs at players who neared the no-no zone, and loosing mutant pit bulls just to up the conflict. This entire game was about manipulation and mind games.

You can argue that the climax was sentimental and predictable. You can even argue it was meant to set up sequels. But it certainly didn't come out of nowhere. The entire plot set this up.

But I'm splitting hairs. It's just a popcorn flick after all.
Nope the changing of the rules was not predictable. It was a deus ex machina device. It was not consistent with the story's internal logic. Are you saying that the tributes and the audience should have expected the rules to have been changed arbitrarily? The rule I'm talking about is the one allowing 2 survivors. Are we supposed to believe that in the 74 year history of the games, the rulers never thought about creating a love angle to make the games more interesting? Why did they think about it only now? The love angle obviously was never tried before, otherwise Haymitch who had competed in the games in the past should have known the history of winning strategies and would have suggested that strategy to katniss and Peeta before the games even started. It was totally fortuitous that Peeta confessed his crush for katniss that the idea was planted in Haymtch mind that this was the way to save both their lives.

For fiction to work, it should be believable. It is believable if the plot shows fidelity to its own internal logic. If elements that are discordant with the plot are arbitrarily introduced just so certain characters can survive and the story can move forward, it weakens the story tremendously.

You're right, HG is popcorn flick intended to entertain the minds of 13 year olds.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2012, 08:58 PM
 
358 posts, read 713,444 times
Reputation: 539
The 74 year thing is very confusing. If this has been going on for 74 years, wouldn't people be sort of used to it by now? Why all of a sudden is there rebellion? Why do the people not seem more hardened to this reality? Why do some of the tributes seem soft and naive? Why is there a need to have this bizarre training period prior to the game? Why are the kids developing a strategy from stratch? Why is 74 years of having 23 of 24 of your kids killed on TV seen as delivering "hope" (per Pres Snow)?

Seems like this would make a lot more sense if the war had occured a few years prior (even then this plot has many issues).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2012, 04:05 AM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
771 posts, read 1,402,943 times
Reputation: 438
Quote:
Originally Posted by ndfmnlf View Post
Nope the changing of the rules was not predictable. It was a deus ex machina device. It was not consistent with the story's internal logic. Are you saying that the tributes and the audience should have expected the rules to have been changed arbitrarily? The rule I'm talking about is the one allowing 2 survivors. Are we supposed to believe that in the 74 year history of the games, the rulers never thought about creating a love angle to make the games more interesting? Why did they think about it only now? The love angle obviously was never tried before, otherwise Haymitch who had competed in the games in the past should have known the history of winning strategies and would have suggested that strategy to katniss and Peeta before the games even started. It was totally fortuitous that Peeta confessed his crush for katniss that the idea was planted in Haymtch mind that this was the way to save both their lives.

For fiction to work, it should be believable. It is believable if the plot shows fidelity to its own internal logic. If elements that are discordant with the plot are arbitrarily introduced just so certain characters can survive and the story can move forward, it weakens the story tremendously.

You're right, HG is popcorn flick intended to entertain the minds of 13 year olds.
Obviously this movie has given you a lot to think about and discuss, so it has you somewhat interested.... Any movie I find truly stupid I see no point or waste anytime arguing. It seems like you have a love hate relationship with this movie.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2012, 06:41 AM
Status: "Felon Trump" (set 6 days ago)
 
13,733 posts, read 9,073,222 times
Reputation: 10498
As for the movie: I liked it. I have read the first two books (I lost interest during the third), and I thought the movie did a good job of translating the first book to the screen.

I will note that my wife, who has not read the books, found the movie boring for the first hour or so, although she became more interested when the actual game began.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2012, 06:52 AM
 
Location: Atlanta, GA
696 posts, read 1,306,751 times
Reputation: 597
Haha same here, I was half-awake/half-asleep the first 50 minutes or so...which is really a milestone because I never fall asleep during movies!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by legalsea View Post

I will note that my wife, who has not read the books, found the movie boring for the first hour or so
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2012, 07:14 AM
 
4,183 posts, read 6,541,959 times
Reputation: 1734
Quote:
Originally Posted by mouzon View Post
The 74 year thing is very confusing. If this has been going on for 74 years, wouldn't people be sort of used to it by now? Why all of a sudden is there rebellion? Why do the people not seem more hardened to this reality? Why do some of the tributes seem soft and naive? Why is there a need to have this bizarre training period prior to the game? Why are the kids developing a strategy from stratch? Why is 74 years of having 23 of 24 of your kids killed on TV seen as delivering "hope" (per Pres Snow)?

Seems like this would make a lot more sense if the war had occured a few years prior (even then this plot has many issues).
Excellent questions. That's why the movie loses credibility IMO. Even a fictional story should take pains to tie up these loose ends to make the story more credible. Very amateurish work they did here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2012, 07:16 AM
 
4,183 posts, read 6,541,959 times
Reputation: 1734
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChikidII View Post
Obviously this movie has given you a lot to think about and discuss, so it has you somewhat interested.... Any movie I find truly stupid I see no point or waste anytime arguing. It seems like you have a love hate relationship with this movie.
Because this is the City Data forum about movies and that's what we are here for: to talk about movies we like or dislike.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Movies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top