Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Nevada > Las Vegas
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-21-2010, 11:57 PM
 
Location: Tucson for awhile longer
8,869 posts, read 16,352,212 times
Reputation: 29241

Advertisements

I don't personally know any Walmart employees who live in $400,000 houses in Las Vegas. But I know of one U.S. senator's former aide who lives in a $1.6 million house he can't afford, now that his wife is no longer "assisting" the senator. Would that be an example of a contingency that should have been planned for?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-22-2010, 09:52 AM
 
Location: Kingman AZ
15,370 posts, read 39,174,117 times
Reputation: 9215
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jukesgrrl View Post
I don't personally know any Walmart employees who live in $400,000 houses in Las Vegas. But I know of one U.S. senator's former aide who lives in a $1.6 million house he can't afford, now that his wife is no longer "assisting" the senator. Would that be an example of a contingency that should have been planned for?
along with a years supply of kneepads.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-28-2010, 08:11 PM
 
1,347 posts, read 2,453,389 times
Reputation: 498
Fannie ups the ante for strategic defaulters-
Quote:
Originally Posted by The WSJ
"Walking away from a mortgage is bad for borrowers and bad for communities, and our approach is meant to deter the disturbing trend toward strategic defaulting," said Terence Edwards, Fannie's executive vice president for credit portfolio management.

The government-owned mortgage-finance titan also said it planned to step up legal actions to pursue deficiency judgments in states that allow lenders to go after borrowers' other assets. In addition, Fannie said it would instruct its lender partners to monitor delinquent loans owned by Fannie, and recommend cases that warrant attention.

Fannie to Deny New Mortgages to Defaulters - WSJ.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2010, 05:17 PM
 
3,622 posts, read 5,604,673 times
Reputation: 4322
Quote:
Originally Posted by BayAreaNightmare View Post
No one NEEDS a house..they can buy a condo much cheaper and affordable..they can rent an apartment...etc...

I think people get irritated when they hear others whining about losing their house like its a right! alot people cant afford even thinking about buying a house
Exactly, lol. It's sad and I feel for those who are loosing a home- but it's just like my mom told me, life isn't fair.

Just like it's not fair that everyone walking away from their home is lowering the value of my home while I still have to pay top dollar since I bought when the market was high.

We are not victims and we are not entitled to have a home just because someone loaned us money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2010, 03:38 PM
 
6 posts, read 9,329 times
Reputation: 10
Default 50% under water in Vegas - advice?

Purchased new home in 2005 for $436k - Put down about $50k.
Have a 1st and 2nd (original loans) totalling about $390k.
5yr interest only loan 5.5%. Loan will adjust in September to 3.5%, but payment ironically is going up over $100 p/month. Loan is Libor based and can adjust every year. Luckily enough the Libor rate has been the lowest on record. I can afford the home currently and have no debt, and have never missed/been late on any payments. Our plan is not to live here forever and feel like a prisoner to our location due to our decreased home value. Value of home is about 50% ($180k) of what is owed ($390k). I have a strong belief the value of the home when purchased will never come back, even in 100 years. Have attempted to work with the bank (1st=Chase) but because we can "afford" it, nothing can be done. Even if a refi was an option, our plans are not to live in the same house/city for more than 5-10 more years.

We'd like freedom to be able to up an move in our near future, without the ball and chain of our current home keeping us from the freedom. Have considered just walking away and have the freedom to make these choices. Currently have a good job and stable income.


Do we think the govt. will come up with in the near future a program that assist the people caught up in the mess that can "afford their homes" by way of prinicpal reduction? From a few news clips, it doesn't appear as if the current housing secretary has any plans of doing this. Have investigated all the the current govt. programs and do no appear to qualify for any of them. Only rational thought to stay in our home would be way of principal reduction.

I am not posting to debate morals, right or wrong of walking away, but to investigate all possible current or future options. We are in our mid-30s. I've got an 800+ credit score and understand the ramifications of walking away. We do have dreams of living in other places/states, but our current situation appears to have crushed those dreams for many many years.

Strategic default appears the smartest financial decision at this point.

By the way, we are about the last home left in the neighborhood to have an original $400k loan. Most all homes have already foreclosed and been repurchased for $100-$175k. In other words, are we the silly ones for staying? Just thinking of what the neighbors paid for their houses and knowing what we paid for ours makes me sick.

Thoughts/Advice?
Thanks,
BB

Last edited by bb702; 07-04-2010 at 03:45 PM.. Reason: wanted to add a few more things
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2010, 04:13 PM
 
3,622 posts, read 5,604,673 times
Reputation: 4322
I'm in exactly the same situation, except I have a 30 year fixed loan at 5 percent. I bought when the market was high and just on the tip before the crash- (Nov 2006).I had an idea going into it that a dip was going to happen. However, never thought my home would only be worth half of what I paid a few years later.

I'm not sure what I would do because you are not paying off your house with an interest only, adjustable loan. That makes your situation different than mine. Maybe you can wait and refinance to a fixed loan? Why is refinancing out?

It's not "silly" that you would stick it out and honor your agreement. Buying a house is an investment, you signed the document and took a risk. The government is not responsible for helping you out, and homeowners should not expect to get help from the government.

Believe me, I understand about feeling sick about what the homes are going for right now. If we had just rented the home we were renting for one more year instead of buying this one we would have not lost all the money we put down on the house.

Last edited by lyra33; 07-04-2010 at 04:37 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2010, 04:47 PM
 
6 posts, read 9,329 times
Reputation: 10
Thanks for the feedback. As far as why not refinance? Come September, the new rate of 3.5% will be in effect (currently 5.5%). My payment will be just over $2k p/mo. For some reason I thought when the rate went down, our mortgage payment would go down as well. It's going up. Rates right now are about 4.6%, which means the rate will even jump higher than the 3.5% I'll be in for another year unless I'm missing something. Also, no banks are willing to refinance anyone 50% under water. Govt. programs are not able to assist in this situation, because I can "afford" the home.


I understand the obligation I'm in and am not pointing blame on anyone. We enjoy our home and our town, but don't want it to be the deciding factor in where we want to be the rest of our lives.

BB
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2010, 06:52 PM
 
351 posts, read 838,357 times
Reputation: 197
An investment decision is not a guarantee. If your home-buying investment had skyrocketed would you have refunded the bank more of the original loan value? I sold a home in 2006 at the top & decided renting was more cost effective. Am I a financial wizard? NO! I lost more than I would have paid for a house on a very poor investment "opportunity". I'm not expecting the government to bail me out on it, either!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2010, 07:24 PM
 
3,622 posts, read 5,604,673 times
Reputation: 4322
Quote:
Originally Posted by bb702 View Post
Thanks for the feedback. As far as why not refinance? Come September, the new rate of 3.5% will be in effect (currently 5.5%). My payment will be just over $2k p/mo. For some reason I thought when the rate went down, our mortgage payment would go down as well. It's going up. Rates right now are about 4.6%, which means the rate will even jump higher than the 3.5% I'll be in for another year unless I'm missing something. Also, no banks are willing to refinance anyone 50% under water. Govt. programs are not able to assist in this situation, because I can "afford" the home.


I understand the obligation I'm in and am not pointing blame on anyone. We enjoy our home and our town, but don't want it to be the deciding factor in where we want to be the rest of our lives.

BB
That's a tough situation to be in. Personally I would do anything to get your interest rate fixed so at least you are not subject to the variable rate. My only experience is my own home buying experiences so I'm not sure what you should do. Here is a really good article that might be helpful...

"With people walking away from their houses in droves, and with foreclosure rates rising quickly, would you approve that loan? You wouldn't, if you wanted to keep your job."

Can you refi when you&#39re upside down?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2010, 09:13 PM
 
1,347 posts, read 2,453,389 times
Reputation: 498
Quote:
Originally Posted by bb702 View Post
Thanks for the feedback. As far as why not refinance? Come September, the new rate of 3.5% will be in effect (currently 5.5%). My payment will be just over $2k p/mo. For some reason I thought when the rate went down, our mortgage payment would go down as well. It's going up.
BB, your payment is going up (even though your interest rate is going down) because you're completing the interest only period of your loan. Going forward from September you'll be paying interest and principal. Many others are going to be caught in the same dilemma. Best of luck with whatever choice you ultimately make.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Nevada > Las Vegas
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top