[ElleTea]

Originally Posted by tazz

You have spoken to everyone about tramp stamps. Wow I don't have that much free time.

Yes, I have interviewed every single person on the planet. I speak a lot of languages and I have a lot of free time!

Seriously, though, I have not heard anyone use that term for a long time. (going by internet, TV, speaking with friends, etc) Maybe a decade ago when they were "new" and it was still considered risque for a girl to have a tat, but tattoos are so mainstream they are usually now called something like "a lower back tattoo." Having a tattoo there (or anywhere) is no longer a way to brand someone a tramp.
That was my point.

[aggrofish]

Lower back tattoos = tramp stamp, or target as I like to say.

I probably have tattoos that are older than some of the people on here, but still, people go way overboard these days. Everyone from moms to DBs with their fauxhawk are rockin' tattoos. It's so mainstream now that it's passe. People with Tattoos are no longer the exception they're mainstream and followers.

However, I still like tatted women who smoke because they're easy. There are studies somewhere that prove that but I'm too lazy to find them.

[Cyborgt800]

I found the study:

Tattoo On The Lower Back Sound Clip and Quote - Hark

It's from Wedding Crashers!

[ElleTea]

Originally Posted by aggrofish

Lower back tattoos = tramp stamp, or target as I like to say.

I probably have tattoos that are older than some of the people on here, but still, people go way overboard these days. Everyone from moms to DBs with their fauxhawk are rockin' tattoos. It's so mainstream now that it's passe. People with Tattoos are no longer the exception they're mainstream and followers.

However, I still like tatted women who smoke because they're easy. There are studies somewhere that prove that but I'm too lazy to find them.

A friend once said "Not having a tattoo is the new tattoo"

What does DB stand for?

[aggrofish]

Don't know if it's censored or not but douche bag

[Cyborgt800]

I've been told by many people that they do what they do to be different...I always ask them why they do it in the same way as everyone else then...

[BBMW]

I always thought there would be big money in it for some enterprising tattoo artist/chemist who could come up with permanent (meaning won't fade over time), but easily eraseable tattoo ink. It would be erased by tattooing over the original tattoo with a chemical which would break down the tattoo ink (which was designed to be susceptable to this), but would be non-toxic.

[NLVgal]

Originally Posted by Cyborgt800

^^^^[^ But only if those valet dudes can find his @$%&ing car! Lol!

^^^^^ Funny!

[NLVgal]

Originally Posted by BBMW

I always thought there would be big money in it for some enterprising tattoo artist/chemist who could come up with permanent (meaning won't fade over time), but easily eraseable tattoo ink. It would be erased by tattooing over the original tattoo with a chemical which would break down the tattoo ink (which was designed to be susceptable to this), but would be non-toxic.

That's a very good idea. Could you patent it without having the exact formulation of the ink and the reversal chemical? If so, you should.

[BBMW]

^
Probably not, and I don't know if I could whip it up using my (now quite old and forgotten) high school chemistry.