Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Houston
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-16-2018, 07:56 AM
 
Location: Houston
2,192 posts, read 3,234,622 times
Reputation: 1557

Advertisements

you don't want tons of small districts also as your asking for HISD to reabsorb them also cause some don't have the capacity to stand on their own.

Kill the "magnet programs" which have contributed to the decline of certain communities because you have generations of kids never setting foot in their own zones which play a huge role.

HISD has been a district grooming kids for the suburbs cause people refuse to reciprocate their educational path
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-16-2018, 10:02 AM
 
5,462 posts, read 3,051,941 times
Reputation: 3271
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dopo View Post
Dumb question,
is there any reason HISD has to be so big and not broken up?
Yes. Rivers Oaks, Bellaire shuld be a district of their own. ( like spring branch)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2018, 10:06 AM
 
5,462 posts, read 3,051,941 times
Reputation: 3271
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedThink View Post
Interesting point.

Yes, the Houston Independent School District need to be unified in ensuring that the students are well educated.

As the demographics may change in many neighborhoods and schools, the goal remains the same - ensure that the students are well educated.

Teachers' salaries should be increased and more Gifted and Talented curriculum offered at more schools especially at the pre-k level.

However, the most profound step will be for parents to begin nurturing the child when the child is still in the womb - reading to the child, playing music for the child and eating a healthy diet (minimal fried foods, minimal sugar, minimal sodas, etc.) and light exercise such as walking while being free of stress!

I believe that every child deserves an opportunity for a great education as much as every child deserves great parents who understand the importance of a great education!

How do we ensure that every child have great parents?

Resolving cyclical inter-generational poverty is crucial along with intercession by other concerned parents, groups and other institutions.

Also, an increase in affordable housing and discounted job re-training for adults is a step in the right direction.

In fact, the local junior colleges and vocational schools should offer 50% reduction in tuition for not only adults who are maybe older than 55 but maybe having programs that allow young teenage mothers to receive mentoring by others may be beneficial.

Having a child when one is 14 or 15 or 16, etc. and dropping out of school is not a wise decision but once it has occurred, it appears reasonable to intercede and relay lessons that maybe the parents of the young lady never taught.

Anyway, just rambling but thought that I would offer some thoughts...
Instead of increasing the freebies like lunch, breakfast, english classes etc, they should make people pay for schools. That will ensure every one goes off to work - if they really value their future and children;s education. Not privatize, but at least a 100$ per month or so. After all its not a 3rd world country where people live in poverty, its USA.

I mean they should get used to the real world where nothing is free.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2018, 10:06 AM
 
2,556 posts, read 4,068,602 times
Reputation: 4001
Quote:
Originally Posted by shanv3 View Post
Yes. Rivers Oaks, Bellaire shuld be a district of their own. ( like spring branch)
Yeah. Should build a big, beautiful wall, too.

Though I do agree that smaller districts would be better. Geographic quadrants make more sense then portioning off rich little pockets in the middle of a swath of less-privileged areas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2018, 11:22 AM
 
Location: Hougary, Texberta
9,019 posts, read 14,336,959 times
Reputation: 11033
Quote:
Originally Posted by shanv3 View Post
Instead of increasing the freebies like lunch, breakfast, english classes etc, they should make people pay for schools. That will ensure every one goes off to work - if they really value their future and children;s education. Not privatize, but at least a 100$ per month or so. After all its not a 3rd world country where people live in poverty, its USA.

I mean they should get used to the real world where nothing is free.
What do you think the largest portion of your property taxes is? Clearly either you've never looked, or never been responsible for your own bills. HISD's biggest problem is crushing poverty. 81% of HISD students are eligible for free/subsidized lunch. To meet that guideline, as an example, a family of four can't have an income of more than $46,500 annually. You want to take 5% of their gross monthly income on top of what they pay in taxes as well? Good luck with that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2018, 11:48 AM
 
5,462 posts, read 3,051,941 times
Reputation: 3271
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeyyc View Post
What do you think the largest portion of your property taxes is? Clearly either you've never looked, or never been responsible for your own bills. HISD's biggest problem is crushing poverty. 81% of HISD students are eligible for free/subsidized lunch. To meet that guideline, as an example, a family of four can't have an income of more than $46,500 annually. You want to take 5% of their gross monthly income on top of what they pay in taxes as well? Good luck with that.
I am just wondering if the 81% pay property taxes. I assume most of them are renting ( Even though it may be factored in their rent).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2018, 12:27 PM
bu2
 
24,149 posts, read 14,989,666 times
Reputation: 13013
Quote:
Originally Posted by hbcu View Post
all, Kashmere should've been closed when Wheatley was built or even send them to Booker T or North Forest. They've rebuilt Sterling and Worthing when one school could've housed all (even with Jones closing). Scarborough has always been small but they hang on when you can send them to Waltrip.
Kashmere was fine until they built Barbara Jordan and siphoned off a lot of students. Its outside 610, so Wheatley is not really a good place for them to go.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2018, 12:29 PM
bu2
 
24,149 posts, read 14,989,666 times
Reputation: 13013
Quote:
Originally Posted by hbcu View Post
all, Kashmere should've been closed when Wheatley was built or even send them to Booker T or North Forest. They've rebuilt Sterling and Worthing when one school could've housed all (even with Jones closing). Scarborough has always been small but they hang on when you can send them to Waltrip.
They threw a fit when they talked about closing Scarborough in the 80s. The Waltrip people probably weren't that enthused since many of them would have had to be rezoned to Washington.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2018, 12:37 PM
 
Location: Houston
2,192 posts, read 3,234,622 times
Reputation: 1557
some folks zoned to Waltrip should've been at Booker T anyway as parts of Acres Homes off 249 was zoned to Waltrip but it should've been Booker T. Didn't realize how close Scarborough was to the Aldine border anyway as that school needs to be evaluated.

Forgot about Barbara Jordan, that school could've been combined with Kashmere as they've taken their fair share of kids from across the district also.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2018, 12:54 PM
 
4,875 posts, read 10,098,022 times
Reputation: 1993
Quote:
Originally Posted by bu2 View Post
Kashmere was fine until they built Barbara Jordan and siphoned off a lot of students. Its outside 610, so Wheatley is not really a good place for them to go.
Interestingly Barbara Jordan is not a high school in its own right any longer. Now it serves as a vocational center for students attending other high schools. The deaf program moved to Milby.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hbcu View Post
you don't want tons of small districts also as your asking for HISD to reabsorb them also cause some don't have the capacity to stand on their own.

Kill the "magnet programs" which have contributed to the decline of certain communities because you have generations of kids never setting foot in their own zones which play a huge role.

HISD has been a district grooming kids for the suburbs cause people refuse to reciprocate their educational path
Exactly. Also people should remember that HISD did *not* have a choice on whether to absorb North Forest; the state ordered them to. The arrangement was an advantage IMO as it meant North Forest wasn't broken up into pieces (although representation-wise it was divided between two different HISD board districts, and parts of its attendance boundary were given to Key and Kashmere, with small sections given to existing non-NF HISD elementaries).

If there weren't big mega-districts the state would likely break up some poorly-performing small districts. I saw Inkster School District in Michigan broken into pieces and that was bad for that city.

Magnet programs will not be killed in HISD; if they were, all it means is more people will leave, especially middle/upper class African-Americans. There has been de-emphasis of magnet programs in the West U/Bellaire areas for elementary schools, though, as the zoned schools have become so full that they can't have magnet programs anymore. This, IMO, is the better route to "kill" magnet programs, make it so the desirable neighborhood schools have so many zoned students they can't have magnets.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dopo View Post
Dumb question,
is there any reason HISD has to be so big and not broken up?
Also civil rights complaints (why won't we be with the rich folk anymore), and some of the new resulting districts may completely collapse, and the State of Texas has to do something about them and merge them a la North Forest or Wilmer Hutchins.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DejaBlue View Post
Which parts of Cyfair? The Fairbanks area? That's already hood and a drag on Cyfair. I'm sure they would give it up quick like I'm sure Klein would to the KF feeder pattern schools.



HISD needs to be chopped up into about 3 districts. Look at the DFW area. HISD up there would be about 5 districts. They have so many little districts and I feel like as a whole, they're better off. HISD is just too big with too many low performing schools.


Is HISD a Title 1 district? When I was in high school someone told me that a district can be Title 1 if a high school is and that KF should be a Title 1 high school but the district has been pushing back to not be labeled as a whole Title 1
There are small parts of CFISD in the Houston city limits to the southeast, and I think that does correspond with the Fairbanks community. No high schools are in the zone but Dean Middle School and a few elementaries are in the Houston city limits. The map of CFISD is here https://www.cfisd.net/download_file/26479/5036/ - it doesn't seem to have the Houston city limits but you can see them here http://www.houstontx.gov/planning/An..._city_11x8.pdf

DFW does have its own mega-district, Dallas Independent School District, and suggestions of cutting it up had been printed in Dallas newspapers. Yet this hasn't happened, and DISD absorbed Wilmer-Hutchins back in the day. Fort Worth ISD is also a pretty big district.

Quote:
Originally Posted by shanv3 View Post
Instead of increasing the freebies like lunch, breakfast, english classes etc, they should make people pay for schools. That will ensure every one goes off to work - if they really value their future and children;s education. Not privatize, but at least a 100$ per month or so. After all its not a 3rd world country where people live in poverty, its USA.

I mean they should get used to the real world where nothing is free.
HISD understandably has gone in the opposite direction, making meals free for everyone. This is because many of the students are poor (you don't want to make them pay!), and trying to determine who is eligible to pay takes up administrative money and time.

shanv, as per "I mean they should get used to the real world where nothing is free.", IMO that's insulting to the poor: they fight like hell to get benefits from stingy government agencies when they deserve the help, and they have the right to be upset at the bureaucracies. Considering how the amount of employment will go down (as in there will not be enough work for people who want it), we should move towards basic income to keep people alive and in decent *basic* conditions.

A better way to say it is: "They fight like hell to get what should be free to low income citizens."

Last edited by Vicman; 10-16-2018 at 01:44 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Houston
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top