Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > House
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-04-2012, 05:28 PM
 
15,632 posts, read 24,443,939 times
Reputation: 22820

Advertisements

I have several "Stanley 31164 Indoor Wireless Remote Control with Single Transmitter" throughout my house. One transmitter controls up to three receivers that are plugged into outlets. I use them to turn on/off multiple night lights in various rooms.


I purchased them on Amazon:

http://www.amazon.com/Stanley-31164-...5247574&sr=8-2


I've read about other brands of receivers like this overheating and catching the wall on fire -- so I check the receivers regularly to ensure that they're not hot. I've also checked out the Stanley product line and never found any reports of recalls or complaints about overheating or fires.

However, an incident happened the other night that has me a bit concerned. One of the night lights/receivers is plugged into an outlet in the kitchen. My coffee maker is also plugged into that outlet. I usually dont make coffee at night, but I did the other night. So both the night light/receiver and the coffee maker were on -- and this tripped the breaker. Twice. After that, I removed the night light/receiver from that outlet and had no more problem with the coffee maker.

Now I'm concerned about why the breaker would have tripped. I tried plugging the night light without the receiver into that outlet and turning it on while the coffee maker was on. The breaker didnt trip.

Is it possible that the coffee maker and the receiver combined pull too much energy for that outlet? I read the instructions that accompanies the remote control and receivers and there's nothing about overloading an outlet.

I really like these remote control devices and not because I'm lazy. I'm still recovering from a stroke a few years ago and it's difficult for me to turn on night lights manually. But I need them because, in the dark, my balance is not good -- and I prefer night lights to lamps when I just want to walk through a room. However, I dont want to have to worry about a fire.

Thanks so much for any information.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-06-2012, 08:38 AM
 
Location: Bend Or.
1,126 posts, read 2,927,430 times
Reputation: 958
I am assuming you had something plugged into the reciever that you were controlling. This and the coffee pot probably exceeded the capabilities of the breaker. The reciever should not use much, it depends on what you are controlling. That can be the issue. Also the reciever should have a rating of what it can safely control. Do not exceed that rating, it maybe be lower than the breaker and if overloaded could overheat, even below the breaker capability.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2012, 09:18 AM
 
Location: Johns Creek, GA
17,475 posts, read 66,084,834 times
Reputation: 23627
I know money can and will always be an issue with certain things for a home. And though I understand your circumstances, I think you should consider a better technology.
In every term I could possibly think of I could not find anything on those Stanley remotes. Even on all of the Stanley websites- which leads me to believe that they sold their name to use on those cheap Chinese devices.
The new technology, which can incorporate the use of IR, RF, and "i" series and/or android devices is the latest and safest technology available. When Lutron first came out with their QS series I immediately got my electrical subcontractor to start boning-up on it capabilities. I sold it as an upgrade feature. Check their webpage-
Lutron HomeWorks® QS System Overview

Granted it's not the cheap plug-in that you have now but, is it worth your life? Living safe doesn't come cheap.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2012, 09:19 AM
 
15,632 posts, read 24,443,939 times
Reputation: 22820
Quote:
Originally Posted by whirnot View Post
I am assuming you had something plugged into the reciever that you were controlling. This and the coffee pot probably exceeded the capabilities of the breaker. The reciever should not use much, it depends on what you are controlling. That can be the issue. Also the reciever should have a rating of what it can safely control. Do not exceed that rating, it maybe be lower than the breaker and if overloaded could overheat, even below the breaker capability.

Thanks so much for your reply.

Yes, I had a small night light plugged in to the receiver.

As a test, I plugged just the night light (not the receiver) in to the outlet and turned it on. Then I turned the coffee pot on. The breaker didnt trip.

But, when the night light was plugged in to the receiver and the coffee pot was on, the breaker did trip.

As a precaution, I'm not plugging anything in to that outlet until I can get an electrician out to check it out.

Thanks again!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2012, 09:21 AM
 
15,632 posts, read 24,443,939 times
Reputation: 22820
Quote:
Originally Posted by K'ledgeBldr View Post
I know money can and will always be an issue with certain things for a home. And though I understand your circumstances, I think you should consider a better technology.
In every term I could possibly think of I could not find anything on those Stanley remotes. Even on all of the Stanley websites- which leads me to believe that they sold their name to use on those cheap Chinese devices.
The new technology, which can incorporate the use of IR, RF, and "i" series and/or android devices is the latest and safest technology available. When Lutron first came out with their QS series I immediately got my electrical subcontractor to start boning-up on it capabilities. I sold it as an upgrade feature. Check their webpage-
Lutron HomeWorks® QS System Overview

Granted it's not the cheap plug-in that you have now but, is it worth your life? Living safe doesn't come cheap.

Thanks so much! I'll check out the Lutron link!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2012, 10:54 AM
 
1 posts, read 4,935 times
Reputation: 10
Default Remotes won't work independently

I also have a problem with the Stanley indoor wireless remote controls. I bought 1 set of 3 with 1 remote and loved it so much I bought a second set for another part of the house. When I set up the second set I found that both remotes from 2 different sets controls both sets of plug ins at the same time. So that both remotes control both #3 plugs for both sets even though they are on seperate floors of the house. How can I change 1 remote and plug set to work independently from the other set? thanks for any help you can give me. Otherwise I have to send the 2nd set back.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2012, 01:53 PM
 
Location: Johns Creek, GA
17,475 posts, read 66,084,834 times
Reputation: 23627
Quote:
Originally Posted by pulvert View Post
I also have a problem with the Stanley indoor wireless remote controls. I bought 1 set of 3 with 1 remote and loved it so much I bought a second set for another part of the house. When I set up the second set I found that both remotes from 2 different sets controls both sets of plug ins at the same time. So that both remotes control both #3 plugs for both sets even though they are on seperate floors of the house. How can I change 1 remote and plug set to work independently from the other set? thanks for any help you can give me. Otherwise I have to send the 2nd set back.


Check the back of the packaging for the frequency setting.
Whatever that freq is, is obviously the same as the other. Just get a set that has a different freq.
Depending on manufacturer some list actual freq, others use A, B, or C.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > House

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top