Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-04-2010, 03:51 PM
 
4,500 posts, read 12,349,473 times
Reputation: 2901

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by aveojohn View Post
Maybe if some of these idiots got there arse kicked or shot, they might think twice the next time.
Because that's proven to be so effective, hasn't it?

Isn't that more or less how things worked back in the day?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-05-2010, 04:19 AM
 
Location: New Kensington (Parnassus) ,Pa
2,422 posts, read 2,280,661 times
Reputation: 603
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheViking85 View Post
Because that's proven to be so effective, hasn't it?

Isn't that more or less how things worked back in the day?
What do you suggest, incarcerate them after they have killed your wife and kids?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2010, 05:15 AM
 
4,500 posts, read 12,349,473 times
Reputation: 2901
Quote:
Originally Posted by aveojohn View Post
What do you suggest, incarcerate them after they have killed your wife and kids?
That'd be a start, yes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2010, 05:17 AM
 
4,500 posts, read 12,349,473 times
Reputation: 2901
I REALLY struggle with the argument "Home invader = Murderer" there's a difference, and if someone ACTUALLY tried to kill me or a member of my family, of anyone for that matter, I'd do what I could to stop it, of course, going a bit further in the case of me or my family. If that in some cases means killing the perpetrator, so be it, but there's a BIG difference between that, and shooting a person for being on your property.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2010, 05:55 AM
 
Location: I think my user name clarifies that.
8,292 posts, read 26,687,320 times
Reputation: 3925
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheViking85 View Post
I REALLY struggle with the argument "Home invader = Murderer" there's a difference, and if someone ACTUALLY tried to kill me or a member of my family, of anyone for that matter, I'd do what I could to stop it, of course, going a bit further in the case of me or my family. If that in some cases means killing the perpetrator, so be it, but there's a BIG difference between that, and shooting a person for being on your property.
There's no question what's going to happen to somebody if I find them having broken into my home. It has something to do with an oak ballister and his head.

But I'm curious how you feel about a different scenario...
I find that same guy having broken into my garage, where he is helping himself to thousands of dollars worth of tools. Maybe even trying to steal my motorcycle. For me, he's fair game - same as if he were in my house.

What's your view?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2010, 07:45 AM
 
Location: No Mask For Me This Time, Either
5,662 posts, read 5,091,130 times
Reputation: 6088
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheViking85 View Post
I REALLY struggle with the argument "Home invader = Murderer" there's a difference, and if someone ACTUALLY tried to kill me or a member of my family, of anyone for that matter, I'd do what I could to stop it, of course, going a bit further in the case of me or my family. If that in some cases means killing the perpetrator, so be it, but there's a BIG difference between that, and shooting a person for being on your property.
There's a difference, but how long are you willing to wait to make that determination? Are you willing to let someone, who has already broken into you house and is there to cause harm in some form, make the attempt before you would be willing to take active measures to stop them? You indicated that you'd "go a bit further" if the perp were trying to harm you or your family. Does this mean you wouldn't do as much were they trying to harm someone else, perhaps a visiting guest, within your home?

And if in the tragic case of someone killing your wife and/or kids, would you be in any way satisfied with them being merely locked up, knowing you had not taken action pre-emptively, maybe upon discovering them in the house, to terminate them if you had the opportunity?

Could this be likened to discovering a termite and deciding to wait to see if it's going to cause damage before you step on it? In both cases, the termite or the intruder, they're not there to help you. Do you place value on the life of a person who has taken premeditated and active steps to cause you harm, even to the point of inflicting deliberate injury or death?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2010, 09:02 AM
 
4,500 posts, read 12,349,473 times
Reputation: 2901
Quote:
Originally Posted by Omaha Rocks View Post
There's no question what's going to happen to somebody if I find them having broken into my home. It has something to do with an oak ballister and his head.

But I'm curious how you feel about a different scenario...
I find that same guy having broken into my garage, where he is helping himself to thousands of dollars worth of tools. Maybe even trying to steal my motorcycle. For me, he's fair game - same as if he were in my house.

What's your view?
Why don't you just insure your things?

If I walked in on a guy stealing my tools and motorcycle I'd call the cops, and tell him so. He'd probably run off.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Workin_Hard View Post
There's a difference, but how long are you willing to wait to make that determination? Are you willing to let someone, who has already broken into you house and is there to cause harm in some form, make the attempt before you would be willing to take active measures to stop them? You indicated that you'd "go a bit further" if the perp were trying to harm you or your family. Does this mean you wouldn't do as much were they trying to harm someone else, perhaps a visiting guest, within your home?
It means I wouldn't sacrifice my life trying to save someone who's not my family, but I'd do what I could. Doesn't matter if it's in my house or not.

And yes, I wouldn't shoot or kill someone (I wouldn't shoot anyone simply because I don't own a gun) unless it was very clear that mine or a member of the households life is in danger. And before you ask "What about if he tries to rape your wife/children etc" I'd do what I'd have to do, if he/she ended up dead as a result of that I wouldn't be heartbroken over it.

But if you don't see the difference between say, surprising a thief and either scare him off or immobilizing them until the cops get there, and straight up kill someone, simply for theft, then I'm not sure if you'll ever understand what I'm talking about.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Workin_Hard View Post
And if in the tragic case of someone killing your wife and/or kids, would you be in any way satisfied with them being merely locked up, knowing you had not taken action pre-emptively, maybe upon discovering them in the house, to terminate them if you had the opportunity?

Could this be likened to discovering a termite and deciding to wait to see if it's going to cause damage before you step on it? In both cases, the termite or the intruder, they're not there to help you. Do you place value on the life of a person who has taken premeditated and active steps to cause you harm, even to the point of inflicting deliberate injury or death?
I didn't know that my satisfaction was what should determine the sentence. If he killed my wife, I would never be satisfied, no matter what were to happen to whoever did it. The result would still be the same, my wife would still be dead, and I don't need to kill someone to try and mend my feeling of inadequacy. I'd be just as inadequate, only I'd be a murderer as well.

So no, I would not be satisfied with them being locked up, but I certainly wouldn't be satisfied with killing them either, and if by some slim chance whoever did it manages to turn their life around and do some good with it, then at least that's something, though I doubt I'd ever see it that way. But that's why we have a judicial system, because whoever is left behind won't have the clearness of mind to put things in perspective.

As far as termites go, I don't think it's a valid example, because you know what a termite will do, you don't know what some intruder will do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2010, 09:31 AM
 
Location: I think my user name clarifies that.
8,292 posts, read 26,687,320 times
Reputation: 3925
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheViking85 View Post
Why don't you just insure your things?

If I walked in on a guy stealing my tools and motorcycle I'd call the cops, and tell him so. He'd probably run off.
First of all, my stuff is insured.

But please note the word "my"... It's my stuff, not his. It doesn't not belong to some pissant loser who wants to steal things rather than simply work for a living.

In addition, if I called the cops and they actually arrived and actually arrested the guy, he'd be back on the street that same day. And he'd come back to visit.

On the other hand, if he has a long conversation with my baseball bat, he probably won't be back.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2010, 09:42 AM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 87,014,195 times
Reputation: 36644
Quote:
Originally Posted by aveojohn View Post
What do you suggest, incarcerate them after they have killed your wife and kids?
The number of non-drug-related, non-gang-related homicides in the USA in which "wife and kids" are murdered by a stranger or an intruder is, in some years, zero. So, stop associating with drug dealers, and get out of the gang, and you have nothing to worry about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2010, 11:01 AM
 
Location: Homeless
1,203 posts, read 1,983,653 times
Reputation: 516
Quote:
Originally Posted by aveojohn View Post
What do you suggest, incarcerate them after they have killed your wife and kids?
Which means our tax money goes to take care of the morons.
Executing them is much cheaper.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top