Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If I was defining the South, I still have WV and VA in. I consider the Southeast to be the Southern states east of the Mississippi. South Central to me are Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana, and Arkansas...
I divide the West into the Pacific states, and Interior West. I think Nevada is a Pacific state as it's population centers of Reno and Vegas are very much oriented to the coast...
The Midwest I think is an eastern and western Midwest, split along the Mississippi...
And I'm okay with defining the Northeast as DC on up...
Now, there's overlap in every region. El Paso and West Texas are more Interior/Mountain West than Southern. There are shades of the South still in Maryland and Delaware. And every region can be further subdivided into subsections, like I think the Mid-Atlantic in practicality is a transition area that reaches across both the Northeast and the South. I think the Southwest is multi-region and you could call parts of Nevada, Utah, and Texas Southwest...
'Tis long been that way and likely ever to be that way.
The clarity of it was further clarified (pun intended) in the 20th century when Suffolk County NY - the European settlement of which originally came from CT & MA - emphatically became suburbia for NYC. The LIRR was created as a tool to transport New Yorkers to Newport and Boston via a ferry between Greenport and Stonington (the ferry being a creature of Commodore Vanderbilt, who made his first bones breaking up the Livingston clans' monopoly control of the ferries in New York Harbor) and that same train system eventually led to the suburbanization of LI, first after WW1, and then on highway steroids after WW2.
Almost 1000 votes in, once you do your own you can see the results. And 1000 votes in you can see WV and VA are viewed by the consensus as turning Northeast purple-y...
The names of the five categories pretty much taint the map if you want to split the states into five groups. With those descriptors, I'd pretty much agree with that division, but more strongly agree with VA in the South, and have the same barely giving WV to the Northeast (The whole existence of the state was predicating on not being in the South, and while the ties to OH are strong, the geography is more common to a wider region of the Northeast).
If I were to split the states into five categories (with no subdividing states), though it'll look more like:
Northeast: NY PA NJ MD WV DE (DC) | MA CT NH ME RI VT
Southeast: FL GA AL | NC VA TN SC
Midwest: IL OH MI IN WI KY | MN IA NE SD ND
West: CA AZ UT NV HI | WA OR AK
South Central?: TX MO LA OK AR KS MS | CO NM ID MT WY
Granted, there's a lot finagling here to get things to somewhat balanced population numbers, with ID + MT + WY just being given to the otherwise least populated region. Otherwise, the "internal split" of the fifth (Akin to New England vs Midatlantic, Great Plains vs Great Lakes, etc) would be the watersheds of the lower Mississippi, the Red River, and the start of the Missouri vs the Rockies states.
'Tis long been that way and likely ever to be that way.
The clarity of it was further clarified (pun intended) in the 20th century when Suffolk County NY - the European settlement of which originally came from CT & MA - emphatically became suburbia for NYC. The LIRR was created as a tool to transport New Yorkers to Newport and Boston via a ferry between Greenport and Stonington (the ferry being a creature of Commodore Vanderbilt, who made his first bones breaking up the Livingston clans' monopoly control of the ferries in New York Harbor) and that same train system eventually led to the suburbanization of LI, first after WW1, and then on highway steroids after WW2.
Ah, but it works both ways. Just to declarify your statement of clarity, by the 1840s about 40% of New York State population had New England roots. Even more if you count New England descendants in New York from the colonial era.
Here is something that might shock people.....
One might ask a century later, “But why a New England Society in Brooklyn?†Census records of the 1870s indicate that there were more people of New England descent living in Brooklyn, already the nation’s third largest city, than in Boston. As a major manufacturing center and with a seaport larger than New York’s, it attracted great numbers of New Englanders in the years immediately preceding and after the Civil War.
Interesting, in the 19th century Brooklyn was still a separate city and had a bigger seaport than Manhattan. I did not know that! Anyway, the point is that New Englanders were coming to not just Upstate but Downstate as well.
And New Yorkers were flowing back eastward as well. The New York, New Haven and Hartford railroad as well as steamship lines like the Fall River Line sent as many New Yorkers eastward as the Long Island Railroad as you mentioned. Today a very large percentage of Connecticut's population, as well as smaller pops in Rhode Island, Massachusetts and Vermont are descended from New Yorkers.
Almost 1000 votes in, once you do your own you can see the results. And 1000 votes in you can see WV and VA are viewed by the consensus as turning Northeast purple-y...
Here's how the survey breaks each state down by region:
Northeast
82% Connecticut
82% Maine
82% Massachusetts
82% New Hampshire
82% New York
82% Rhode Island
82% Vermont
81% New Jersey
81% Pennsylvania
75% Delaware
72% Maryland
40% West Virginia
35% Virginia
21% Ohio
14% Michigan
11% Indiana
11% Kentucky
10% North Carolina
7% Illinois
7% South Carolina
So more people think Alabama could be part of the Pacific than Missouri could be in the South. Also Iowa and Mississippi being the only non-Pacific, non-Northeast states in 80+ range is surprising.
Faith in humanity destroyed. :P
That said, if assuming 6% of people just made everything red to see the results, that still leaves 4% for Pacific Alabama.
As the son of Nutmeggers who moved to LI after right after WW2, I might be an example of what you describe. But...my family were most definitely cultural outliers in the Boom era and following decades. We were swamped by cultural New Yorkers (from The City), and the cultural legacy of New England Yankee culture was of a ever-receding residue of the past.
As for Brooklyn: a famous example of which you describe in pop culture would be Arsenic & Old Lace, with the Brewster family obviously intended to be of English and perhaps New English-to-Brooklyn origin. The overlay of Dutch and New English in Kings & Queens Counties (the latter including what is now Nassau - oddly claiming the Dutch identity heritage) used to be strong. It was swamped in the 20th century.
One might liken it to glaciers and terminal moraine, but here reversing the process, with NYC being an expanding glacier covering over the former cultural terminal moraine of New England.
So more people think Alabama could be part of the Pacific than Missouri could be in the South. Also Iowa and Mississippi being the only non-Pacific, non-Northeast states in 80+ range is surprising.
Faith in humanity destroyed. :P
That said, if assuming 6% of people just made everything red to see the results, that still leaves 4% for Pacific Alabama.
Pacific takes a higher share of states across the board. SC, FL, and NC each at 10%, TN at 9%. Pacific was either the second ranked or tied for the second ranked choice for each state. Even NY, IA, and MI you see the same type of thing. I have two theories on this:
1) Pacific is the default option when you get to the website. If you just click around on the map, and don't pay attention to what the choices represent, you're voting Pacific unknowingly.
2) People forgot Mexico is to the south and don't realize the Gulf of Mexico is the Atlantic rather than the Pacific.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.