Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-26-2021, 03:23 PM
 
Location: Unknown
570 posts, read 560,053 times
Reputation: 684

Advertisements

I'm most surprised by New York, Illinois and Louisiana. Seems like the media was overhyping the mass exudes from those states.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-26-2021, 03:26 PM
 
14,020 posts, read 15,008,176 times
Reputation: 10466
Doe anyone know If GDP numbers are bottom up (eg they try to get a picture of what people make/consume them extrapolate it over the population or top down (know the GDP then divide by population)

If so Arizona or whatever would be richer than we thought.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2021, 03:36 PM
 
Location: Atlanta metro (Cobb County)
3,158 posts, read 2,209,438 times
Reputation: 4210
Quote:
Originally Posted by dbcook1 View Post
Despite a slowdown overall in population change between 2010 and 2020 compared to 2000 - 2010, it looks like 18 states actually accelerated their absolute population growth the past decade compared to the preceding one. Here are the ones that accelerated their growth in absolute numbers (ranked in order by to what degree they accelerated):

1. Michigan (went from a decline of 55k in 2000 - 2010 to almost 200k gained in 2010 - 2020. An incredible turnaround for the state)
2. Rhode Island
3. North Dakota
4. Massachusetts
5. New York
6. Louisiana
7. Ohio
8. New Jersey
9. South Dakota
10. Iowa
11. Washington
12. Nebraska
13. Montana
14. Minnesota
15. Vermont
16. Colorado
17. Oregon
18. Idaho (absolute growth was almost exactly the same in 2010 - 2020 as 2000 - 2010)
Interesting that only one of these states has a predominantly warm climate, which is Louisiana. Their inclusion on the list can be explained by growth in the 2000s being severely suppressed due to Hurricane Katrina's destructive impacts. Without such an event in the 2010s, the state's growth rate returned to its more typical slow, but positive pace.

The urban Northeast certainly surpassed expectations. One advantage the region has in terms of growth is a high rate of immigration from a wide variety of countries. Puerto Rico's precipitous decline likely involved many transplants moving to the Northeast as well.

In some of the Sunbelt states, a larger share of immigration is from Mexico, which is not sending as many migrants to the US as in the past. This may be part of the explanation behind states like Arizona and Texas falling short of estimates and past growth rates.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2021, 04:03 PM
 
Location: Green Country
2,868 posts, read 2,816,527 times
Reputation: 4798
Quote:
Originally Posted by btownboss4 View Post
Doe anyone know If GDP numbers are bottom up (eg they try to get a picture of what people make/consume them extrapolate it over the population or top down (know the GDP then divide by population)

If so Arizona or whatever would be richer than we thought.
GDP Per capita is top-down. They take the production and divide by the population. The lower your denominator, or the higher the numerator, the better your GDP per capita will be.

So less people (lower denominator) = higher GDP per capita.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2021, 04:22 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,655 posts, read 67,506,468 times
Reputation: 21239
7.4% is a 25% decline in growth rate from 2010.

Population and 10-year growth rate
1950 151,325,798 14.50%
1960 179,323,175 18.50%
1970 203,211,926 13.32%
1980 226,545,805 11.48%
1990 248,709,873 9.78%
2000 281,421,906 13.15%
2010 308,745,538 9.71%

These fastest growing states really arent growing as fast as in the past. Growth rates are declining fast and we face negative replacement sooner than many might realize.

Quote:
Originally Posted by New York Times
U.S. Population Over Last Decade Grew at Slowest Rate Since 1930s
With immigration leveling off and a declining birthrate, the United States may be entering an era of substantially lower population growth, demographers said.

By Sabrina Tavernise and Robert Gebeloff
April 26, 2021
Updated 5:17 p.m. ET
Over the past decade, the United States population grew at the slowest rate since the 1930s, the Census Bureau reported on Monday, a remarkable slackening that was driven by a leveling off of immigration and a declining birthrate...
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/26/u...s-numbers.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2021, 04:27 PM
 
Location: Baltimore
21,629 posts, read 12,746,938 times
Reputation: 11221
Wow, Rhode Island and Connecticut grew.

Overall a huge underestimate of the number of immigrants going to the northeast still
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2021, 04:30 PM
Status: "Freell" (set 4 days ago)
 
Location: Closer than you think!
2,856 posts, read 4,617,717 times
Reputation: 3138
My initial thoughts regarding MSAs:

1) Houston or Dallas may be slightly overestimated.
2) Philadelphia may be underestimated and closer to 6.2 million.
3) DC and Miami could be overestimated by 50,000 people.
4) Phoenix may be overestimated by 150,000 plus.
5) Boston remains number 10.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2021, 04:30 PM
 
611 posts, read 365,068 times
Reputation: 527
Quote:
Originally Posted by dbcook1 View Post
1. Michigan (went from a decline of 55k in 2000 - 2010 to almost 200k gained in 2010 - 2020. An incredible turnaround for the state)

I wonder, did the dire situation of the auto industry during the great recession have a lot to do with MI's decline in 2010? Given the auto industry turnaround soon after, it might make sense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2021, 04:35 PM
 
8,858 posts, read 6,856,075 times
Reputation: 8666
Washington state seems to be a winner here. It grew by the fifth largest amount (980,741), and its estimates appeared to align with the count.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2021, 04:45 PM
 
Location: New York City
9,379 posts, read 9,329,574 times
Reputation: 6509
Wow, Pennsylvania surpassed 13M? I was not expecting that, but great news.

I wonder if the gap between Pennsylvania and Illinois will continue to widen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top