Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-14-2021, 03:37 PM
 
93,393 posts, read 124,052,832 times
Reputation: 18268

Advertisements

^This post offers some information: https://www.city-data.com/forum/60910882-post22.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-16-2021, 03:34 PM
 
Location: Albany, New York
102 posts, read 117,880 times
Reputation: 160
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdAilment View Post
According to what?
I'm not entirely sure what you mean, but it was a fairly popular prediction on this forum and elsewhere that the 2020 census was going to reveal that New York state had lost around a million people or so. While a 4.2% population growth for New York is still a fair bit below the US average of 7.2%, the actual results are still far more positive than the predictions were.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2021, 03:50 PM
 
Location: Northern United States
824 posts, read 714,034 times
Reputation: 1495
Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyNY View Post
I'm not entirely sure what you mean, but it was a fairly popular prediction on this forum and elsewhere that the 2020 census was going to reveal that New York state had lost around a million people or so. While a 4.2% population growth for New York is still a fair bit below the US average of 7.2%, the actual results are still far more positive than the predictions were.
I think what that merely means was less people moved away than thought, not that the mortality rate of the state was high. Personally I thought you were referring to something covid related because officials were caught fudging numbers to make the mortality rate seem lower.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2021, 05:34 AM
 
93,393 posts, read 124,052,832 times
Reputation: 18268
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northeasterner1970 View Post
I think what that merely means was less people moved away than thought, not that the mortality rate of the state was high. Personally I thought you were referring to something covid related because officials were caught fudging numbers to make the mortality rate seem lower.
I think the larger point is that the state was underestimated during the 2010-2019 period. This occurred with some NY areas last decade as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2021, 08:48 PM
 
Location: Albany, New York
102 posts, read 117,880 times
Reputation: 160
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northeasterner1970 View Post
I think what that merely means was less people moved away than thought, not that the mortality rate of the state was high. Personally I thought you were referring to something covid related because officials were caught fudging numbers to make the mortality rate seem lower.
Ah, my apologies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2021, 12:56 PM
 
Location: Atlanta metro (Cobb County)
3,162 posts, read 2,215,339 times
Reputation: 4225
It looks like the first set of local area 2020 Census results will be coming out next Thursday, August 12.

https://twitter.com/uscensusbureau/s...161291/photo/1
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2021, 05:24 PM
 
Location: Northeast states
14,055 posts, read 13,946,605 times
Reputation: 5198
Quote:
Originally Posted by jas75 View Post
It looks like the first set of local area 2020 Census results will be coming out next Thursday, August 12.

https://twitter.com/uscensusbureau/s...161291/photo/1
It 2021 they have technology to release numbers faster than that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2021, 10:49 PM
 
1,378 posts, read 1,222,359 times
Reputation: 615
Quote:
Originally Posted by BPt111 View Post
It 2021 they have technology to release numbers faster than that.

Most definitely, shouldn't have taken this long
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2021, 12:18 PM
 
3,217 posts, read 2,360,306 times
Reputation: 2742
Quote:
Originally Posted by rnc2mbfl View Post
The greater SLC area is way larger than greater Albuquerque. There's over 2.6 million people in Greater SLC, while greater Albuquerque (including Santa Fe) is less than half that size. There's more people in greater SLC than all of NM.
Great SLC is not 2.6 million. That is the US Census bureau definition for CSA which is a far wider and a more challenged metric for areas to be seen as highly co-dependent. The SLC Metropolitan Statistical Area is less than half that at 1,232,696. I've been to Austin, Charlotte, San Antonio and Portland, all are in the 2.3 to 2.8 million range for MSAs and if you been to SLC and to any of the others listed here, one can easily see the latter is nowhere as large/dense. Its 45 miles downtown to downtown SLC to Provo. That's farther than Dallas to Fort Worth (30 miles), D.C. to Baltimore (40miles) and only 3 miles shorter than S.F. to San Jose, the latter are thus, separate MSAs but included as part of a CSA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2021, 12:31 PM
 
3,217 posts, read 2,360,306 times
Reputation: 2742
Quote:
Originally Posted by cwkimbro View Post
I haven't seen sufficient reason to think the estimates for these areas are going to be off by much, but it is close.

There is one X-factor I am tracking and waiting for in the Atlanta area and we will find out around 2023. It is what the official boundaries of the MSAs will be like.

I looked at the commuter flow data for 2011-2015 and Gainesville MSA and Atlanta MSA are extremely close to becoming one using the 25% commuter benchmark from Hall County into the core Atlanta MSA counties.

While I really consider Gainesville to be it's own city of influence in its own right, Southern Hall County is very much suburban growth from Atlanta and it has been under rapid growth, similar to other nearby exurban areas to a large extent. I expect this to be close, perhaps a 50-50 chance.

It will be a 200k swing in the MSA, because everything is determined by the way the county boundaries are drawn. If we could magically re-draw such boundaries, my guess is about 1/3 of the population belongs to Metro Atlanta and has for some time and the rest really pre-existed and belongs to Gainesville.

While some more distant exurban counties might be added or taken away, this is the one major change to track for Atlanta for 2020 or 2030.

I haven't processed any information for places like Reading, PA.
Gainesville won't be added to Atlanta's MSA. Its nearly 55 miles distance between downtowns and there is low density and daily shared commuting traffic between the two. As an example Baltimore/DC, SF/San Jose, are closer to each other than ATL to Gainesville, by 10 to 14 miles, yet all four cities are still considered separate MSAs. Farthest city in the Phila. MSA is Wilmington, DE, about 31 miles south.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top