Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Well, it says that it's a mule, so of course it looks like the Flex/something in production already. That's what mules are. It doesn't mean the production car will look anything like that.
The mule doesn't mean anything towards how it will look. If you look at the pics, you will see how the front end doesn't line up correctly with the rest of the body (especially at the pillars near the windshield). Car makers will usually take a body of one of their cars and put it over what they're testing. They do this when testing things like engines, tranmissions, frames, suspensions, etc.
i don't like it either, but didn't the older exploders have a high rate of rollovers? It looks lower to the ground and less likely to roll but i agree i don't like the looks, it looks very similar to a van.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Isn't the Flex enough? It looks like a bloated Flex!
