Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-03-2009, 07:06 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,128,317 times
Reputation: 9383

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by rkb0305 View Post
give me a break! smoking is a choice. If you can't afford it, quit.
So is investing, going to work, working hard, becoming rich.. Thats also a CHOICE.. whats your point? That those who do this shouldnt be taxed either?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-03-2009, 07:08 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,128,317 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by vec101 View Post
Not sure what the debate is between you and other poster but the entire tax increase is supposed to go to SCHIP.
The debate is this. The tax increase will result in one of two things
1) People will continue to smoke, pay more taxes, meaning the pledge was a lie
2) People stop smoking, less money goes to SCHIP, and this means that other taxes need to be raised to fund this and other programs, meaning again, it was a lie.. Either way.. taxes have gone up..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2009, 07:17 PM
 
Location: Fort Worth/Dallas
11,887 posts, read 36,928,893 times
Reputation: 5663
Quote:
Originally Posted by compJockey View Post
If you smoke, I agree your taxes will go up.
You just made my point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2009, 07:47 PM
 
Location: here
24,873 posts, read 36,181,169 times
Reputation: 32726
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
So is investing, going to work, working hard, becoming rich.. Thats also a CHOICE.. whats your point? That those who do this shouldnt be taxed either?
My point is, if you don't want to pay the tax, don't smoke. It is an easy one to avoid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2009, 07:49 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,128,317 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkb0305 View Post
My point is, if you don't want to pay the tax, don't smoke. It is an easy one to avoid.
Kinda my point.. if I dont want to pay taxes, I should simply stop working.. that ones even easier to avoid...

Ooh I know, I can quit my job, then credit Obama with giving me the tax cut I've always wanted..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2009, 07:59 PM
 
Location: Charleston, WV
3,106 posts, read 7,376,777 times
Reputation: 845
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
The debate is this. The tax increase will result in one of two things
1) People will continue to smoke, pay more taxes, meaning the pledge was a lie
2) People stop smoking, less money goes to SCHIP, and this means that other taxes need to be raised to fund this and other programs, meaning again, it was a lie.. Either way.. taxes have gone up..
Sounds right to me. It is one or the other of those.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2009, 09:42 PM
 
Location: DFW
40,951 posts, read 49,206,955 times
Reputation: 55008
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
So is investing, going to work, working hard, becoming rich.. Thats also a CHOICE.. whats your point? That those who do this shouldnt be taxed either?
A true socialist point of view.

My parents raised me where going to work and working hard was something you did for survival. Not a choice, but I guess in Obamas world if you don't want to work that's OK.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2009, 09:58 PM
 
2,661 posts, read 2,904,439 times
Reputation: 366
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
The debate is this. The tax increase will result in one of two things
1) People will continue to smoke, pay more taxes, meaning the pledge was a lie
2) People stop smoking, less money goes to SCHIP, and this means that other taxes need to be raised to fund this and other programs, meaning again, it was a lie.. Either way.. taxes have gone up..
I smoke, so I'm not celebrating the idea of paying more.

1) I disagree with your assumption of malice and consequent victory celebration "he's a liar! This proves it!". The link to politifact presents a couple of perspectives. And you call it a pledge? cute. I guess campaign promise didn't sound dramatic enough?
2) How much money would we save if fewer people smoked (healthcare costs)? I don't have an answer, but I bet it would not be insignificant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2009, 10:01 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,128,317 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by compJockey View Post
I smoke, so I'm not celebrating the idea of paying more.

1) I disagree with your assumption of malice and consequent victory celebration "he's a liar! This proves it!". The link to politifact presents a couple of perspectives. And you call it a pledge? cute. I guess campaign promise didn't sound dramatic enough?
2) How much money would we save if fewer people smoked (healthcare costs)? I don't have an answer, but I bet it would not be insignificant.
How much money would be saved if we put $5 tax on Big Macs to lower heart attacks? That also would save lives... How many lives would be saved if we ban driving vehicles and thereby no more car accidents? Why how much money would be saved if we banned liberals from reproducing? At least welfare costs would go down...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2009, 10:11 PM
 
2,661 posts, read 2,904,439 times
Reputation: 366
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
How much money would be saved if we put $5 tax on Big Macs to lower heart attacks? That also would save lives... How many lives would be saved if we ban driving vehicles and thereby no more car accidents? Why how much money would be saved if we banned liberals from reproducing? At least welfare costs would go down...
Sigh.

1. You presented a negative - no further funding when people stop smoking.
2. I wonder in response, how much that would be cancelled out by reduction in healthcare costs.
3. You wander off into never-never land.

A pleasure as always.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top