Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Just because you are at odds with a country does not always mean war is brewing. If there is anything that should be wanted by the US and IRAN is peace. Who cares what they say in Iran. We have our own problems to take care of.
They are hoping for somebody who is going to be rational. That doesn't mean weak. Trying to reason with the current administration was futile. they are hoping someone will come in who they can discuss there worries and concerns and work out a solution thats a win/win for everybody. Is this possible? Who knows, but we have been working on a Us against them policy and look where its gotten us. Its time to shift gears and see what other options are available. Stop your one way thinking.
This is just too rich, I mean you can't buy this kind of PR from an ad agency.
From the actual article it states they feel he is more flexible and rational
Which is then translated to mean, "weakness".
This is pretty much the essence of faith based life in America. Rational thought is weak...
Whats next, burning liberals at the stake on the White House lawn? Calling Bachmann to the white phone...
That's a weak an uneducated guess. You think faith based people can't think rational? That's ridiculous.
How about:
Iran
January 19, 1984
That's the date they got named a: state sponsor of terror. Irrational thinking would be a thought process of detente`. The ignorant thought process is detente` as they speak of the utter destruction of other sovereign nations. Clinton did not disagree. What's your rational thinking?
From the actual article it states they feel he is more flexible and rational
Flexible in what way? Perhaps they think they have a better chance of obtaining those nuclear weapons to wipe Israel off the map? Could that be what they're thinking?
You must realize that Israel will no doubt attack Iran's facilities in the near future, especially if Obama is elected.
Top officials in Iran are proposing a preemptive strike against Israel to avoid an assault on its nuclear reactors, Israel's Haaretz newspaper reported Wednesday.
Is this the crisis the gaffemaster was talking about? Can we extrapolate his warning that the "response" from a Pres. Obama would not be looked at as "correct"?
I guess that explains why you are quick to deride Obama.
This thread is ridiculous. Not even worth giving it another thought it's so ludicrous.
Have a great night.
Nope. I deride Obama for switching his positions based on political expedience. I deride him for taking the same position as McCain on more issues than his supporters would like to admit. And I certainly don't think his economic plans make a whole lot of sense. I do however agree with him that talking with our enemies is important. It is possible to engage in diplomacy without appearing weak.
All the more reason to vote against him. Do you think these countries have the best interests of the US in their hearts?
So we have no allies in the world? England, Canada, Australia, Japan, Spain, Italy, Germany, France, even Israel... Are all pulling for Obama. Believe it or not, we need our allies on our side.
Be compassionate.....meanwhile they plan on converting your children into Sharia Law. Off with your daughters head for getting raped
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
