Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-16-2008, 08:14 AM
 
Location: New York City
1,836 posts, read 3,182,448 times
Reputation: 379

Advertisements

I'd love to see how much Joe the Plumber will have to come out of pocket for health coverage for his family with that $5000 credit for health insurance.

McCain is spreading the wealth to the Health Care Industry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-16-2008, 08:15 AM
 
Location: T or C New Mexico
2,600 posts, read 2,323,806 times
Reputation: 607
Plumbing: skilled labor force.
Outsource:? a contract in Iraq or Afghanistan.
Minimum wages are still well below what it actually costs to maintain a quality standard of living for a family of 3 to 4, plus, factor in single parents either from separations, divorces, etc., and after paying child care, child supports, it's very little to have a good quality of life.
It's true, write-offs, deductions, expenses all play to the lowering of the taxes assesed, as most everything used or purchased for a business is deductable.
Yes, corporate greed, may be nearing the end of an era. one can only hope.
joe the plumber isn't voting for obama because he is afraid of higher taxes. I don't think he needs to be concerned about this at all, after all, it's a well known fact that the more you make, the more they take anyway.
Are what we as Americans paying in taxes reasonable? isn't it true that every year, the amount we pay in taxes increases every year? I don't think most Americans object to that, the thing they object to is not getting the pay increases or cost of living increases they're entitled to. one must have a certain dollar amount in deductions, and not allowed to itemize their deductions if it doesn't meet the bar.
I think a smart or schrewd small business owner can find enough deductions to meet the bar or level, and remain in business, and have enough to have their net earnings lowered, thus, lowering the tax they will pay.
I too owned a small business, cargo expediting. the first year of operating, I ended up oweing the IRS about $3K, on top of what I'd already paid in. I was young and new to it. after turning my accounting over to CPA, I owed nothing the second year, that is, I paid nothing additionally than what I'd paid in already. the third year, I made $5K in profit.
did I take $$$ under the table for hauling cargo? no. it wasn't possible, everything was above board.
If a business is operating in the red, they need to reconsider staying in business at all.
if joe plumber thinks he can't turn a profit from a new business, and has fear of taxation, he should either stay out, or consult with an accountant and an attorney before he leaps.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbuszu View Post
1) Typically a business which earns 250k per year has enough tax write-offs to get it way down into much lower tax brackets. I thus would argue that a business earning 1,000,000+ per year in revenue might find itself paying in the 250k/39% per year proposed tax bracket but hardly any smaller businesses would.
2) Just as businesses can, smart individuals with tax accountants (or knowledge of tax law) with personal incomes of 250k probably know how to get their taxable income much lower through write-offs. I would argue that until you're earning up to or in excess of 500,000+ finding yourself in the 250k/39% per year proposed tax bracket is very unlikely for the vast majority of the US citizens out there.

Once people realize those taxation truths, Obama's plan doesn't seem nearly as bad. The reality is that wealthy people and corporate financial officers (or tax accountants) know how to reduce taxable income significantly. Even middle class folks like my wife and I figured out how this can be done at much lower income levels. If you're not finding ways to decrease taxable income (using write-offs, etc), then you're just wasting money in my book.

Most certainly very wealthy and medium-sized businesses will be taxed more under Obama, but the entire middle class and even lower-affluent class will not see a real change in anything. I really find it amazing that some multi-millionaires out there today can be so crass as to oppose Obama on this point alone. If you have millions (or billions) in the bank and in annual income, you are essentially set for life already. How much is enough? Is another percent or two of government taxes really going to disrupt your lifestyle?

To oppose taxation by the government altogether is one thing. But to support taxation and also push the majority of taxation responsibility upon those who are not set for life, who have yet to realize the American Dream, while the economic class divide increases and the middle class disappears is just irrational.

I really don't know who Joe the plumber really is. What I do know is that:

1) A business which earns 250k per year in taxable income probably costs a small fortune to purchase. Joe the plumber must be doing quite alright for himself to be planning to do this.

2) It is a shame that Joe the plumber's opinion is being held up as the end all be all of how the rest of America should judge Obama's or McCain's tax plans. The truth is that the US needs more high paying or at least middle class income paying jobs and the only way to achieve that will be to a) put a stopper in offshore outsourcing of US jobs, b) bring back old or develop new industries based in the US. I doubt Joe the plumber has any concept of this since plumbing isn't exactly something which can be outsourced. Additionally, Joe hasn't even purchased nor started his own business yet. He thus has zero credentials in my book to be taken seriously as a small business tax advisor. What does he actually know? He doesn't work for himself, and as far as I know he never has. He has a lot to learn and shouldn't be in the spotlight at all regarding this election. I don't care about his opinion on this topic, and neither should you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2008, 08:17 AM
 
Location: Colorado
1,904 posts, read 3,987,476 times
Reputation: 2375
Why should I care what Joe the Plumber has to say? Oh wait, he stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night. OK Joe, I'm all ears...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2008, 08:17 AM
 
Location: Austin
4,105 posts, read 8,287,058 times
Reputation: 2134
Quote:
Originally Posted by *Danielle* View Post
I wish I was in 'Joe's' position to even consider buying a business...He must not be *that* bad off...
But Danielle, his name is "Joe" so that means he must be just like the greeters at Wal*Mart that will fall for this ruse even though he makes a quarter-million dollars a year.

Did he bring his six pack to his interviews this morning? It's sad so many people are stupid enough to fall for this crap.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2008, 08:17 AM
 
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
2,868 posts, read 9,550,526 times
Reputation: 1532
He would get taxed at 39% instead of 36%.
He would also get a 50% tax credit – a cut in taxes for health care. “if your revenue is above 250 – then from 250 down, your taxes are going to stay the same. It is true that from 250 up – from 250 – 300 or so, so for that additional amount, you’d go fro 36 to 39%, which is what it was under Bill Clinton. And the reason why we’re doing that is because 95% of small businesses make less than 250.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2008, 08:18 AM
 
472 posts, read 872,121 times
Reputation: 159
Quote:
Originally Posted by BringTheContent View Post
Well, females love Obama because he's SOOOOOOOOOOO handsome and he's such a great speaker and he gives them that special special feeling. You're not the average Joe. You're the average Jane. I hope your husband won't mind the changes that are coming.
What changes are those? The last years of the Bush Presidency has given us a cratering economy... stagnant wages, rising costs, and significant drop in personal wealth for many Americans. His tenure has driven up deficits, paid for an expensive war and nation reconstruction and weakened our national currency.

So the assumption that voting Obama is worse than what we already have is purely ludicrus. We are at the bottom of the barrel... or may be hitting bottom soon. Personally I'm sick of the fear mongering... after all mongering is what got us into this mess.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2008, 08:20 AM
 
7,138 posts, read 14,634,766 times
Reputation: 2397
Quote:
Originally Posted by BringTheContent View Post
The fact that you're not in his position doesn't mean he's wrong. It also doesn't give you the right to determine whether or not he's "that bad off"

Last time I checked, he was doing what Americans were always encouraged to do. He's working his way up in the world. If he can buy the business he can hire people. Then they can get a paycheck instead of a handout.


And this is exactly what socialism does to a society, brings out the jealousy and greed of those who might have less than the other Joe. Jealousy because they haven't got what the other has, don't want to work harder to get it, would rather just grab onto their guvment handout, all the while hating the one trying to get ahead. And ever trying to determine who is better or worse off than you are under a repressive regime. It will only get uglier folks, count on it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2008, 08:20 AM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,453,111 times
Reputation: 4799
Just come out and say it:

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2008, 08:20 AM
 
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
2,868 posts, read 9,550,526 times
Reputation: 1532
he’d get a 50% tax credit – a cut in taxes for health care. “if your revenue is above 250 – then from 250 down, your taxes are going to stay the same. It is true that from 250 up – from 250 – 300 or so, so for that additional amount, you’d go fro 36 to 39%, which is what it was under Bill Clinton. And the reason why we’re doing that is because 95% of small businesses make less than 250.

So he would get taxed at 39% instead of 36%...coupled with a 50% tax credit for Health Care...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2008, 08:21 AM
 
Location: The Land of Lincoln
2,522 posts, read 4,391,035 times
Reputation: 580
I think he really struck a chord with Americans. More people can relate to him and his work ethic than they can to Obama, that's for sure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top